Pupillary correlates of preparatory control in the Stroop task

被引:3
作者
Unsworth, Nash [1 ]
Miller, Ashley L. L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oregon, Dept Psychol, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
Cognitive and attentional control; Stroop; Working memory; WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY; LATENT-VARIABLE ANALYSIS; ATTENTION CONTROL; LOCUS-COERULEUS; SECONDARY MEMORY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; ANTERIOR CINGULATE; INTEGRATIVE THEORY; COGNITIVE CONTROL; ADAPTIVE GAIN;
D O I
10.3758/s13414-023-02751-z
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In three experiments, individual differences in preparatory control in the Stroop task were examined. Participants performed variants of the Stroop task while pupillary responses were examined during the preparatory interval. Variation in working memory capacity was also examined. High Stroop performers tended to demonstrate larger preparatory pupillary responses than low Stroop performers. In Experiment 2, when participants were given pre-cues indicating the congruency of the upcoming trial (MATCHING vs. CONFLICTING), high Stroop performers had larger preparatory pupillary responses for incongruent trials compared to congruent trials, whereas low Stroop performers demonstrated similar preparatory pupillary responses on both incongruent and congruent trials. These results suggest that variation in Stroop performance is partially due to individual differences in the ability to ramp up and regulate the intensity of attention allocated to preparatory control processes. Additionally, there was limited evidence that preparatory control processes partially account for the relation between working memory capacity and performance on the Stroop. Overall, these results provide evidence that individual differences in Stroop performance are partialy due to variation in preparatory control.
引用
收藏
页码:2277 / 2295
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Preparatory adjustment of cognitive control in the task switching paradigm [J].
Gesine Dreisbach ;
Hilde Haider .
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2006, 13 :334-338
[32]   Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity, Attention Control Fluid Intelligence, and Pupillary Measures of Arousal [J].
Robison, Matthew K. ;
Brewer, Gene A. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2022, 48 (09) :1296-1310
[33]   Alertness and cognitive control: Interactions in the spatial Stroop task [J].
Schneider, Darryl W. .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2020, 82 (05) :2257-2270
[34]   Cognitive control and schizophrenia: The greatest reliability of the Stroop task [J].
Laurenson, Charlotte ;
Gorwood, Philip ;
Orsat, Manuel ;
Lhuillier, Jean-Paul ;
Le Gall, Didier ;
Richard-Devantoy, Stephane .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2015, 227 (01) :10-16
[35]   Functional Roles of Neural Preparatory Processes in a Cued Stroop Task Revealed by Linking Electrophysiology with Behavioral Performance [J].
Wang, Chao ;
Ding, Mingzhou ;
Kluger, Benzi M. .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (07)
[36]   Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task [J].
Sabourin, Laura ;
Santa Vinerte .
JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2020, (156)
[37]   Anxiety, Emotional Distraction, and Attentional Control in the Stroop Task [J].
Kalanthroff, Eyal ;
Henik, Avishai ;
Derakshan, Nazanin ;
Usher, Marius .
EMOTION, 2016, 16 (03) :293-300
[38]   Alertness and cognitive control: Interactions in the spatial Stroop task [J].
Darryl W. Schneider .
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2020, 82 :2257-2270
[39]   Electrophysiological Evidence of Anticipatory Cognitive Control in the Stroop Task [J].
Bianco, Valentina ;
Berchicci, Marika ;
Mussini, Elena ;
Perri, Rinaldo Livio ;
Quinzi, Federico ;
Di Russo, Francesco .
BRAIN SCIENCES, 2021, 11 (06)
[40]   Attentional control in the aging brain: Insights from an fMRI study of the Stroop task [J].
Milham, MP ;
Erickson, KI ;
Banich, MT ;
Kramer, AF ;
Webb, A ;
Wszalek, T ;
Cohen, NJ .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2002, 49 (03) :277-296