Donor BMI and Post-living Donor Liver Transplantation Outcomes: A Preliminary Report

被引:7
|
作者
Lin, Jessica S. [1 ]
Muhammad, Haris [1 ]
Lin, Timothy [2 ]
Kemel, Ihab [3 ]
Baghdadi, Azarakhsh [3 ]
Rizkalla, Nicole [4 ]
Ottmann, Shane E. [5 ]
Wesson, Russell [5 ]
Philosophe, Benjamin [5 ]
Gurakar, Ahmet [2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Anesthesia, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Surg, Div Transplant Surg, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
来源
TRANSPLANTATION DIRECT | 2023年 / 9卷 / 02期
关键词
BODY-MASS INDEX; HEPATIC STEATOSIS; QUANTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1097/TXD.0000000000001431
中图分类号
R3 [基础医学]; R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1001 ; 1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background.Living liver donor obesity has been considered a relative contraindication to living donation given the association with hepatic steatosis and potential for poor donor and recipient outcomes. We investigated the association between donor body mass index (BMI) and donor and recipient posttransplant outcomes. Methods.We studied 66 living donors and their recipients who underwent living donor liver transplant at our center between 2013 and 2020. BMI was divided into 3 categories (<25, 25-29.9, and >= 30 kg/m(2)). Magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction was used to quantify steatosis. Donor outcomes included length of stay (LOS), emergency department visits within 90 d, hospital readmissions within 90 d, and complication severity. Recipient outcomes included LOS and in-hospital mortality. The Student t test was used to compare normally distributed variables, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for nonparametric data. Results.There was no difference in donor or recipient characteristics based on donor BMI. There was no significant difference in mean magnetic resonance imaging fat percentage among the 3 groups. Additionally, there was no difference in donor LOS (P = 0.058), emergency department visits (P = 0.64), and hospital readmissions (P = 0.66) across BMI category. Donor complications occurred in 30 patients. There was no difference in postdonation complications across BMI category (P = 0.19); however, there was a difference in wound complications, with the highest rate being seen in the highest BMI group (0% versus 16% versus 37%; P = 0.041). Finally, there was no difference in recipient LOS (P = 0.83) and recipient in-hospital mortality (P = 0.29) across BMI category. Conclusions.Selecting donors with BMI >= 30 kg/m(2) can result in successful living donor liver transplantation; however, they are at risk for perioperative wound complications. Donor counseling and perioperative strategies to mitigate wound-related issues should be used when considering obese living donors.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Auxiliary partial orthotopic living donor liver transplantation in a patient with alcoholic liver cirrhosis to overcome donor steatosis
    Cho, JY
    Suh, KS
    Kwon, CH
    Yi, NJ
    Kim, MA
    Jang, JJ
    Minn, KW
    Lee, KU
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 19 (05) : 424 - 429
  • [12] Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Preoperative Planning and Postoperative Complications
    Hecht, Elizabeth M.
    Wang, Zhen J.
    Kambadakone, Avinash
    Griesemer, Adam D.
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Heimbach, Julie K.
    Fidler, Jeff L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 213 (01) : 65 - 76
  • [13] Summary of the British Transplantation Society UK Guidelines for Living Donor Liver Transplantation
    Manas, Derek
    Burnapp, Lisa
    Andrews, Peter Antony
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 100 (06) : 1184 - 1190
  • [14] Evaluation outcomes of donors in living donor liver transplantation: a single-center analysis of 132 donors
    Yuan, Ding
    Wei, Yong-Gang
    Li, Bo
    Yan, Lu-Nan
    Wen, Tian-Fu
    Zhao, Ji-Chun
    Zeng, Yong
    Chen, Ke-Fei
    HEPATOBILIARY & PANCREATIC DISEASES INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 10 (05) : 480 - 488
  • [15] Influence of donor and recipient gender on liver transplantation outcomes in Europe
    Germani, Giacomo
    Zeni, Nicola
    Zanetto, Alberto
    Adam, Rene
    Karam, Vincent
    Belli, Luca S.
    O'Grady, John
    Mirza, Darius
    Klempnauer, Jurgen
    Cherqui, Daniel
    Pratschke, Johann
    Jamieson, Neville
    Salizzoni, Mauro
    Hidalgo, Ernest
    Lerut, Jan
    Paul, Andreas
    Carlos Garcia-Valdecasas, Juan
    San Juan Rodriguez, Fernando
    Villa, Erica
    Burra, Patrizia
    LIVER INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 40 (08) : 1961 - 1971
  • [16] Indications and results of right-lobe living donor liver transplantation
    Vella, Ivan
    di Francesco, Fabrizio
    Accardo, Caterina
    Boggi, Ugo
    Gruttadauria, Salvatore
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2024,
  • [17] Chinese expert consensus on evaluation of donor and donor liver for split liver transplantation
    Yang, Yang
    Dou, Kefeng
    Chen, Guihua
    LIVER RESEARCH, 2022, 6 (02) : 59 - 65
  • [18] Comparison of CT methods for determining graft steatosis in living donor liver transplantation
    Mehmet Şeker
    Cengiz Erol
    Şinasi Sevmiş
    Burcu Saka
    Afak Durur Karakaya
    Abdominal Radiology, 2019, 44 : 2418 - 2429
  • [19] The Impact of Obesity and Associated Comorbidities on the Outcomes after Renal Transplantation with a Living Donor vs. Deceased Donor Grafts
    Yemini, Renana
    Rahamimov, Ruth
    Nesher, Eviatar
    Anteby, Roi
    Ghinea, Ronen
    Hod, Tammy
    Mor, Eytan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (11)
  • [20] Comparison of CT methods for determining graft steatosis in living donor liver transplantation
    Seker, Mehmet
    Erol, Cengiz
    Sevmis, Sinasi
    Saka, Burcu
    Karakaya, Afak Durur
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (07) : 2418 - 2429