A Single-Center Audit of BI-RADS 3 Assessment Category Utilization in Mammography and Breast Ultrasound

被引:0
|
作者
Common, Jessica [1 ]
Abdullah, Peri [2 ]
Alabousi, Abdullah [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Radiol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] York Univ, Fac Hlth, Dept Kinesiol & Hlth Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] St Josephs Healthcare Hamilton, Dept Radiol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] St Josephs Healthcare Hamilton, FRCPC, Dept Radiol, 50 Charlton Ave E, Hamilton, ON L8N 4A6, Canada
来源
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES | 2023年 / 74卷 / 01期
关键词
BI-RADS; 3; probably benign; mammography; breast ultrasound; cancer yield; PROBABLY BENIGN LESIONS; FOLLOW-UP; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; SURVEILLANCE;
D O I
10.1177/08465371221121706
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate outcomes of breast lesions assessed at our institution as probably benign (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System [BI-RADS] category 3) with an expected malignancy rate of less than or equal to 2 %. Methods: Average-risk women with a BI-RADS 3 assessment following mammographic and/or ultrasound evaluation at our institution between January 1 and December 31, 2017 were included. Cancer yield was calculated within 90 days and at 6-month intervals up to 36 months. Results: Among 517 women (median age, 52 years; range, 13-89 years) with a BI-RADS 3 assessment, 349 (67.5 %) underwent biopsy or completed follow-up imaging up to 36 months. One hundred and 68 (32.5 %) were lost to follow-up. Thirty of 349 (8.6 %) had their imaging upgraded and underwent biopsy, yielding six cancers (cancer yield, 6 of 349 women [1.7 %]). Among 569 lesions assessed as BI-RADS 3, 92 (16.2 %) were characterized by morphologic features other than those validated as probably benign in prospective clinical studies. Fifty three of 517 women (10.3 %) had follow-up beyond 24 months, and 24 (4.6 %) had follow-up beyond 36 months. Conclusion: Overall utilization of the BI-RADS 3 assessment category at our institution is appropriate with a 1.7 % cancer yield. However, the rate of loss to follow-up, percentage of non-validated findings assessed as probably benign, and redundancy in follow-up protocols are too high, and warrant intervention. A patient handout explaining the BI-RADS 3 assessment category and automatic scheduling of follow-up studies have been implemented at our center to address loss to follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 77
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Breast Ultrasound Lexicon: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)
    Sedgwick, Emily
    SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 46 (04) : 245 - 251
  • [42] Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) lexicon for breast MRI: Interobserver variability in the description and assignment of BI-RADS category
    El Khoury, Mona
    Lalonde, Lucie
    David, Julie
    Labelle, Maude
    Mesurolle, Benoit
    Trop, Isabelle
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (01) : 71 - 76
  • [43] Diagnostic value of breast ultrasound in mammography BI-RADS 0 and clinically indeterminate or suspicious of malignancy breast lesions
    Dobrosavljevic, Aleksandar
    Rakic, Snezana
    Nikolic, Branka
    Raznatovic, Svetlana Jankovic
    Dikic, Svetlana Dragojevic
    Milosevic, Zorica
    Jurisic, Aleksandar
    Skrobic, Milica
    VOJNOSANITETSKI PREGLED, 2016, 73 (03) : 239 - 245
  • [44] Bi-RADS category 3 nonpalpable breast masses on sonography: long-term results of a prospective cohort study
    Alimoglu, Emel
    Alimoglu, M. Kemal
    Ceken, Kagan
    Kabaalioglu, Adnan
    Apaydin, Ali
    Cassano, Enrico
    Sindel, Timur
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 2012, 40 (03) : 125 - 134
  • [45] BI-RADS Category 3 Comparison: Probably Benign Category after Recall from Screening before and after Implementation of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    McDonald, Elizabeth S.
    McCarthy, Anne Marie
    Weinstein, Susan P.
    Schnall, Mitchell D.
    Conant, Emily F.
    RADIOLOGY, 2017, 285 (03) : 778 - 787
  • [46] The diagnostic value of MRI for architectural distortion categorized as BI-RADS category 3-4 by mammography
    Mei, Haibing
    Xu, Jian
    Yao, Gang
    Wang, Ying
    GLAND SURGERY, 2020, 9 (04) : 1008 - 1018
  • [47] The Accuracy of BI-RADS Classification of Breast Ultrasound as a First-Line Imaging Method
    Hille, H.
    Vetter, M.
    Hackeloeer, B. J.
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2012, 33 (02): : 160 - 163
  • [48] Prognostic importance of ultrasound BI-RADS classification in breast cancer patients
    Kim, Ju-Yeon
    Jung, Eun Jung
    Park, Taejin
    Jeong, Sang-Ho
    Jeong, Chi-Young
    Ju, Young-Tae
    Lee, Young-Joon
    Hong, Soon-Chan
    Ha, Woo-Song
    Choi, Sang-Kyung
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 45 (05) : 411 - 415
  • [49] Significance of Combined Imaging BI-RADS Assessment in Breast Cancer and Pathology Comparison
    Liu, Min
    Zhou, Zhi-Hou
    Li, Ying
    Xu, Jing-Zhong
    Wang, Gang-Ping
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, : 243 - 249
  • [50] Assessment of BI-RADS Category 4 Lesions Detected with Screening Mammography and Screening US: Utility of MR Imaging
    Strobel, Kevin
    Schrading, Simone
    Hansen, Nienke L.
    Barabasch, Alexandra
    Kuhl, Christiane K.
    RADIOLOGY, 2015, 274 (02) : 343 - 351