A Single-Center Audit of BI-RADS 3 Assessment Category Utilization in Mammography and Breast Ultrasound

被引:0
|
作者
Common, Jessica [1 ]
Abdullah, Peri [2 ]
Alabousi, Abdullah [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Radiol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] York Univ, Fac Hlth, Dept Kinesiol & Hlth Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] St Josephs Healthcare Hamilton, Dept Radiol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] St Josephs Healthcare Hamilton, FRCPC, Dept Radiol, 50 Charlton Ave E, Hamilton, ON L8N 4A6, Canada
来源
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES | 2023年 / 74卷 / 01期
关键词
BI-RADS; 3; probably benign; mammography; breast ultrasound; cancer yield; PROBABLY BENIGN LESIONS; FOLLOW-UP; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; SURVEILLANCE;
D O I
10.1177/08465371221121706
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate outcomes of breast lesions assessed at our institution as probably benign (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System [BI-RADS] category 3) with an expected malignancy rate of less than or equal to 2 %. Methods: Average-risk women with a BI-RADS 3 assessment following mammographic and/or ultrasound evaluation at our institution between January 1 and December 31, 2017 were included. Cancer yield was calculated within 90 days and at 6-month intervals up to 36 months. Results: Among 517 women (median age, 52 years; range, 13-89 years) with a BI-RADS 3 assessment, 349 (67.5 %) underwent biopsy or completed follow-up imaging up to 36 months. One hundred and 68 (32.5 %) were lost to follow-up. Thirty of 349 (8.6 %) had their imaging upgraded and underwent biopsy, yielding six cancers (cancer yield, 6 of 349 women [1.7 %]). Among 569 lesions assessed as BI-RADS 3, 92 (16.2 %) were characterized by morphologic features other than those validated as probably benign in prospective clinical studies. Fifty three of 517 women (10.3 %) had follow-up beyond 24 months, and 24 (4.6 %) had follow-up beyond 36 months. Conclusion: Overall utilization of the BI-RADS 3 assessment category at our institution is appropriate with a 1.7 % cancer yield. However, the rate of loss to follow-up, percentage of non-validated findings assessed as probably benign, and redundancy in follow-up protocols are too high, and warrant intervention. A patient handout explaining the BI-RADS 3 assessment category and automatic scheduling of follow-up studies have been implemented at our center to address loss to follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 77
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantitative Ultrasound Analysis for Classification of BI-RADS Category 3 Breast Masses
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    Lo, Chung-Ming
    Chang, Jung Min
    Huang, Chiun-Sheng
    Chen, Jeon-Hor
    Chang, Ruey-Feng
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2013, 26 (06) : 1091 - 1098
  • [2] Analysis of Mammography BI-RADS Distribution and Follow-up Ultrasound Assessment: A Single-Center Study
    Kankaya, Burak
    Buyukasik, Suleyman
    Altundal, Yusuf Emre
    Topcu, Feyza Sonmez
    Rahmanbakhsh, Paria
    Etemad, Ayden
    Kapan, Selin
    Alis, Halil
    BREAST CANCER-TARGETS AND THERAPY, 2025, 17 : 115 - 122
  • [3] Breast pathology and mammography BI-RADS category correlation study - A single institute experience
    Hu, Shaomin
    Szymanski, James
    Khairy, Zeina
    Lo, Yungtai
    Wang, Yanhua
    ANNALS OF DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY, 2018, 35 : 11 - 15
  • [4] BI-RADS 3 on Screening Breast Ultrasound: What Is It and What Is the Appropriate Management?
    Berg, Wendie A.
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2021, 3 (05) : 527 - 538
  • [5] BI-RADS® category 3 lesions on mammogram
    Amor, Mariem Ben Haj
    Boulanger, Thomas
    Ben Miled, Aicha
    Brochet, Julien
    Bridault, Jean-Philippe
    Ceugnart, Luc
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2022, 32 (2-3) : 42 - 48
  • [6] Changes in the Utilization of the BI-RADS Category 3 Assessment in Recalled Patients Before and After the Implementation of Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Stepanek, Tricia
    Constantinou, Niki
    Marshall, Holly
    Pham, Ramya
    Thompson, Cheryl
    Dubchuk, Christina
    Plecha, Donna
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2019, 26 (11) : 1515 - 1525
  • [7] Frequency and Outcomes of BI-RADS Category 3 Assessments in Patients With a Personal History of Breast Cancer: Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Offit, Lily R.
    Chikarmane, Sona A.
    Lacson, Ronilda C.
    Giess, Catherine S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2023, 221 (03) : 313 - 322
  • [8] BI-RADS 3 Assessment on MRI: A Lesion-Based Review for Breast Radiologists
    Nguyen, Derek L.
    Myers, Kelly S.
    Oluyemi, Eniola
    Mullen, Lisa A.
    Panigrahi, Babita
    Rossi, Joanna
    Ambinder, Emily B.
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2022, 4 (05) : 460 - 473
  • [9] Quantitative Ultrasound Analysis for Classification of BI-RADS Category 3 Breast Masses
    Woo Kyung Moon
    Chung-Ming Lo
    Jung Min Chang
    Chiun-Sheng Huang
    Jeon-Hor Chen
    Ruey-Feng Chang
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2013, 26 : 1091 - 1098
  • [10] Outcomes of unconventional utilization of BI-RADS category 3 assessment at opportunistic screening
    Altas, Hilal
    Tureli, Derya
    Cengic, Ismet
    Kucukkaya, Fikret
    Aribal, Erkin
    Kaya, Handan
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2016, 57 (11) : 1304 - 1309