Reasons used by Flemish foster care workers in family reunification decision making

被引:4
作者
Vanderfaeillie, Johan [1 ]
Borms, Dorien [1 ]
Teunissen, M. S. L. [2 ]
Gypen, Laura [1 ]
Van Holen, Frank [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Brussel, Dept Psychol, Pl laan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Leiden Univ, Facul Social Sci, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Pleegzorg Vlaams Brabant Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
OF-HOME CARE; RISK-ASSESSMENT; CHILDREN; OUTCOMES; NEEDS; SERVICES; FLANDERS; PARENTS; SUPPORT; VIEWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106741
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Decisions of child welfare workers regarding permanency planning, including a reunification with the birth parents, have a strong impact on the children and the parents. Although a safe reunification of children placed in out-of-home care is considered an important task of child welfare systems, limited research exists regarding reunification. The current study aims to uncover criteria used by Flemish foster workers to substantiate a reunification decision, how important these criteria are vis-`a-vis each other and how difficult it is to assess these criteria. The criteria for reunification used by foster care workers were examined using concept mapping. Concept mapping resulted in 53 criteria clustered in six clusters ranked in descending importance: (1) Parents offer safety and focus on the child, (2) Conditions for parents, (3) Interest of the child, (4) Reunification is supported, (5) Conditions for the child and (6) Parents are willing to collaborate during and after reunification. The more important criteria are, the more difficult they are considered to assess. This research shows that the most important criteria are changes regarding safety and being able to focus on the interest of the child. Foster care workers consider most criteria easy to assess.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[41]   Admission of the very elderly to the intensive care unit: Family members' perspectives on clinical decision-making from a multicenter cohort study [J].
Heyland, Daren K. ;
Dodek, Peter ;
Mehta, Sangeeta ;
Cook, Deborah ;
Garland, Allan ;
Stelfox, Henry T. ;
Bagshaw, Sean M. ;
Kutsogiannis, Demetrios J. ;
Burns, Karen ;
Muscedere, John ;
Turgeon, Alexis F. ;
Fowler, Rob ;
Jiang, Xuran ;
Day, Andrew G. .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 29 (04) :324-335
[42]   Clarifying the Predictive Value of Family-Centered Care and Shared Decision Making for Pediatric Healthcare Outcomes Using the Medical Expenditure PanelSurvey [J].
Lindly, Olivia J. ;
Zuckerman, Katharine E. ;
Mistry, Kamila B. .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2017, 52 (01) :313-345
[43]   The decision-making process of transferring patients home to die from an intensive care unit in mainland China: A qualitative study of family members? experiences [J].
Lin, Yanxia ;
Long-Sutehall, Tracy ;
Myall, Michelle .
INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2023, 76
[44]   Understanding family-level decision-making when seeking access to acute surgical care for children: Protocol for a cross-sectional mixed methods study [J].
Hall, Bria ;
Tegge, Allison ;
Condor, Cesia Cotache ;
Rhoads, Marie ;
Wattsman, Terri-Ann ;
Witcher, Angelica ;
Creamer, Elizabeth ;
Tupetz, Anna ;
Smith, Emily R. ;
Tokala, Mamata Reddy ;
Meier, Brian ;
Rice, Henry E. .
PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (06)