Emission reduction technology sharing with environmental tax under multiple oligopolies

被引:6
作者
Chen, Junlong [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Chaoqun [1 ,2 ]
Shen, Yiyi [2 ]
Liu, Jiali [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Sch Humanities & Law, Shenyang 110169, Peoples R China
[2] Northeastern Univ Qinhuangdao, Sch Econ, Qinhuangdao 066004, Peoples R China
[3] Jilin Univ, Ctr China Publ Sect Econ Res, Changchun 130012, Peoples R China
[4] Jilin Univ, Sch Econ, Changchun 130012, Peoples R China
关键词
Emission reduction; Environmental tax; Multiple oligopolies; Technology sharing; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; MIXED OWNERSHIP FIRM; CARBON; STRATEGY; COST;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-022-02782-w
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study constructs a Cournot model with multiple enterprises considering the environmental tax, emission reduction technology research and development (R & D), and technology sharing. First, the solution of R & D and sharing boundaries of emission reduction technology are presented. Next, the effects of technology R & D, technology sharing, and environmental tax rates are analyzed. We also reveal the quantitative boundaries of enterprises participating in technology-sharing. The study finds that enterprise decision-making on emission reduction technology R & D and sharing is affected by factors such as the environmental tax rate, R & D cost, and technology sharing fee. Technology R & D and sharing can increase enterprise profits but reduce consumer surplus. Appropriate environmental tax policies contribute to the improvement of social welfare. Technology R & D helps reduce environmental damage and technology sharing can also achieve this under the influence of various factors such as environmental tax. Environmental tax rates affect consumers, enterprises, and social welfare. Consequently, an optimal tax rate is introduced that maximizes social welfare. Excessive environmental tax rates inevitably damage environmental and social welfare. An optimal number of shared enterprises exist in an enterprise's competition process.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 155
页数:29
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [11] A clean innovation comparison between carbon tax and cap-and-trade system
    Chen, You-hua
    Wang, Chan
    Nie, Pu-yan
    Chen, Zi-rui
    [J]. ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2020, 29
  • [12] Cooperation strategy of technology licensing based on evolutionary game
    Cheng, Jinshi
    Gong, Bengang
    Li, Bangyi
    [J]. ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2018, 268 (1-2) : 387 - 404
  • [13] Taxes, permits, and the diffusion of a new technology
    Coria, Jessica
    [J]. RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2009, 31 (04) : 249 - 271
  • [14] Does licensing improve welfare with rent dissipation?
    Ding, Rong
    Ko, Chiu Yu
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2021, 105
  • [15] Licensing under Cournot vs Bertrand competition
    Ferreira, Fernanda A.
    Ferreira, Flavio
    Bode, Oana R.
    [J]. ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2021, 34 (01): : 1651 - 1675
  • [16] Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation
    Fischer, Carolyn
    Newell, Richard G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 55 (02) : 142 - 162
  • [17] How does a mixed ownership firm license a patent?
    Gelves, Juan Alejandro
    Heywood, John S.
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2016, 59 : 278 - 284
  • [18] Carbon emission reductions under global low-carbon technology transfer and its policy mix with R&D improvement
    Gu, Gaoxiang
    Wang, Zheng
    Wu, Leying
    [J]. ENERGY, 2021, 216
  • [19] How to upgrade an enterprise's low-carbon technologies under a carbon tax: The trade-off between tax and upgrade fee
    He, Senyu
    Yin, Jianhua
    Zhang, Bin
    Wang, Zhaohua
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 227 : 564 - 573
  • [20] Can China's industrial sector achieve energy conservation and emission reduction goals dominated by energy efficiency enhancement? A multi-objective optimization approach
    He, Yong
    Liao, Nuo
    Lin, Kunrong
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2021, 149