Efficacy of cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A single-center study in Japan

被引:0
|
作者
Yamamoto, Yoshiyuki [1 ]
Ishii, Makoto [1 ]
Yoshimura, Akihiro [1 ]
Hayashi, Takuji [1 ]
Kawamura, Norihiko [1 ]
Nagahara, Akira [1 ]
Nakai, Yasutomo [1 ]
Nakayama, Masashi [1 ]
Kakimoto, Ken-ichi [1 ]
Nishimura, Kazuo [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Int Canc Inst, Dept Urol, Osaka, Japan
关键词
cabazitaxel; castration-resistant prostate cancer; hemoglobin; overall survival; prognosis; MEN;
D O I
10.1111/iju.15052
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Cabazitaxel is a next-generation taxane that can prolong overall survival after docetaxel treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. However, the efficacy of cabazitaxel varies among these patients. The clinical indicators of the prognosis after cabazitaxel treatment were analyzed. Methods A retrospective review of patients who received cabazitaxel between February 2015 and June 2021 was performed. All patients had metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prognostic factors for prostate-specific antigen progression-free and overall survival were analyzed by Cox proportional-hazards analysis and the log-rank test. Results The study comprised 57 patients who received cabazitaxel (median 4 cycles, range 1-27) at a starting dose of 15-25 mg/m(2). The median age and follow-up duration were 70 years and 9.2 months. The median prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.6 and 10.5 months, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that previous androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapy before cabazitaxel treatment was the only significant risk factor (hazard ratio 2.784, p = 0.022) for prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival. Multivariate analysis for overall survival revealed that poor performance status (>= 1) (hazard ratio 2.107, p = 0.039), low hemoglobin (hazard ratio 0.142, p = 0.010), and high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (hazard ratio 9.150, p = 0.032) at baseline were significantly associated with a poor prognosis. Conclusions Previous androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapy was the only risk factor for biochemical progression. Poor performance status, anemia, and high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio were risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with cabazitaxel. These risk factors seem useful for identifying patients with survival benefit from cabazitaxel treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 27
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cabazitaxel in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Progressing after Docetaxel: A Prospective Single-Center Study
    Cicero, Giuseppe
    De Luca, Rossella
    Dorangricchia, Patrizia
    Galvano, Antonio
    Lo Re, Giuseppe
    Serretta, Vincenzo
    Dispensa, Nino
    Dieli, Francesco
    ONCOLOGY, 2017, 92 (02) : 94 - 100
  • [2] Efficacy of cabazitaxel rechallenge in heavily treated patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
    Thibault, Constance
    Eymard, Jean-Christophe
    Birtle, Alison
    Krainer, Michael
    Baciarello, Giulia
    Flechon, Aude
    Le Moulec, Sylvestre
    Spaeth, Dominique
    Laguerre, Brigitte
    Caffo, Orazio
    Deville, Jean-Laurent
    Beuzeboc, Phillipe
    Hasbini, Ali
    Gross-Goupil, Marine
    Helissey, Carole
    Bennamoun, Mostefa
    Hardy-Bessard, Anne-Claire
    Oudard, Stephane
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 97 : 41 - 48
  • [3] Cabazitaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
    Yap, Timothy A.
    Pezaro, Carmel J.
    de Bono, Johann S.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2012, 12 (09) : 1129 - 1136
  • [4] Risk Factors for Poor Survival in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Treated With Cabazitaxel in Japan
    Yasuoka, Shotaro
    Yuasa, Takeshi
    Ogawa, Masahiro
    Komai, Yoshinobu
    Numao, Noboru
    Yamamoto, Shinya
    Kondo, Yukihiro
    Yonese, Junji
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 39 (10) : 5803 - 5809
  • [5] Safety and efficacy of cabazitaxel in Japanese patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer
    Yamamoto, Teppei
    Ishizuka, Osamu
    Oike, Hiroshi
    Shiozaki, Masashi
    Haba, Tomomi
    Oguchi, Tomohiko
    Iijima, Kazuyoshi
    Kato, Haruaki
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 8 (01) : 27 - 33
  • [6] Cabazitaxel schedules in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a review
    Pobel, Cedric
    Auclin, Edouard
    Procureur, Adrien
    Clement-Zhao, Alice
    Simonaggio, Audrey
    Delanoy, Nicolas
    Vano, Yann-Alexandre
    Thibault, Constance
    Oudard, Stephane
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2021, 17 (01) : 91 - 102
  • [7] A single-center experience with abiraterone as treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
    Thortzen, Anita
    Thim, Stine
    Roder, Martin Andreas
    Brasso, Klaus
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 34 (07) : 291.e1 - 291.e7
  • [8] The Influence of Prednisone on the Efficacy of Cabazitaxel in Men with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
    Buonerba, Carlo
    Sonpavde, Guru
    Vitrone, Francesca
    Bosso, Davide
    Puglia, Livio
    Izzo, Michela
    Iaccarino, Simona
    Scafuri, Luca
    Muratore, Margherita
    Foschini, Francesca
    Mucci, Brigitta
    Tortora, Vincenzo
    Pagliuca, Martina
    Ribera, Dario
    Riccio, Vittorio
    Morra, Rocco
    Mosca, Mirta
    Cesarano, Nicola
    Di Costanzo, Ileana
    De Placido, Sabino
    Di Lorenzo, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 8 (14): : 2663 - 2668
  • [9] Risk stratification of castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with cabazitaxel
    Kosaka, Takeo
    Hongo, Hiroshi
    Mizuno, Ryuichi
    Oya, Mototsugu
    MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 9 (06) : 683 - 688
  • [10] Optimal Timing of Cabazitaxel Introduction for Japanese Patients With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
    Ito, Toshiki
    Kanao, Kent
    Takahara, Kiyoshi
    Ando, Ryosuke
    Yasui, Takahiro
    Shiroki, Ryoichi
    Sumitomo, Makoto
    Miyake, Hideaki
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 39 (06) : 3089 - 3094