Re-examining the Kuznets Curve Hypothesis for South Asian Countries: New Evidences

被引:2
作者
Ali, Majid [1 ]
Tariq, Muhammad [1 ]
Azam Khan, Muhammad [1 ]
机构
[1] Abdul Wali Khan Univ Mardan, Fac Business & Econ, Dept Econ, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
关键词
Gini coefficient; Kuznets curve; income inequality; economic growth; S-shaped curve; South Asian countries; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; INCOME INEQUALITY; TAX POLICY; PANEL; POVERTY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1177/00219096221097744
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
This study re-examines the validity of Kuznets curve hypothesis for six South Asian countries, namely, Pakistan, Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, India, and Bangladesh, over the period 1991-2018. The Pooled Mean Group (PMG) technique results in the short and long run reveal an S-shaped curve relationship between income inequality and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita for all countries, that is, negative at the beginning, positive after the first turning point (GDP per capita level, US$473), and negative after the second turning point (GDP per capita level, US$3827) when GDP per capita reaches the maximum level. In contrast, the country-specific results show, that the first and second turning points of GDP per capita are US$468 and US$2298 for India, US$445 and US$1408 for Pakistan, US$450 and US$9045 for Bhutan, and US$925 and US$6836 for Sri Lanka, which support the validity of the S-shaped curve. Moreover, the results also show the existence of N-shaped curve with GDP per capita (i.e. first and second) turning points of US$473 and US$2864 for Bangladesh and US$105 and US$3568 for Nepal. The findings suggest that income inequality gaps in Asian countries seem to be conditional on the levels of GDP per capita. In this regard, expansionary fiscal policy, specifically in the form of government spending, promotion of exports and employment, and price stability can play a vital role in increasing the GDP per capita levels and narrowing the income inequlaity gaps in the selected Asian countries.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 68
页数:18
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Tax Composition and Growth: A Broad Cross-country Perspective
    Acosta-Ormaechea, Santiago
    Sola, Sergio
    Yoo, Jiae
    [J]. GERMAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2019, 20 (04) : E70 - E106
  • [2] INEQUALITY, POVERTY AND DEVELOPMENT
    AHLUWALIA, MS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 1976, 3 (04) : 307 - 342
  • [3] THE KUZNETS PROCESS AND THE INEQUALITY DEVELOPMENT RELATIONSHIP
    ANAND, S
    KANBUR, SMR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 1993, 40 (01) : 25 - 52
  • [4] An alternative test of Kuznets' hypothesis
    Angeles, Luis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC INEQUALITY, 2010, 8 (04) : 463 - 473
  • [5] Tax Policy for Economic Recovery and Growth
    Arnold, Jens Matthias
    Brys, Bert
    Heady, Christopher
    Johansson, Asa
    Schwellnus, Cyrille
    Vartia, Laura
    [J]. ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2011, 121 (550) : F59 - F80
  • [6] Globalization and income inequality: A panel data econometric approach for the EU27 countries
    Asteriou, Dimitrios
    Dimelis, Sophia
    Moudatsou, Argiro
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2014, 36 : 592 - 599
  • [7] Inequality and Economic Growth in Asia and the Pacific Region
    Azam, Muhammad
    [J]. AFRICAN AND ASIAN STUDIES, 2019, 18 (03) : 288 - 314
  • [8] Tax policy and economic growth: does it really matter?
    Baiardi, Donatella
    Profeta, Paola
    Puglisi, Riccardo
    Scabrosetti, Simona
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL TAX AND PUBLIC FINANCE, 2019, 26 (02) : 282 - 316
  • [9] Inequality and growth in a panel of countries
    Barro, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2000, 5 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [10] Bhandari R., 2010, INT J EC SCI APPL RE, V3, P7