Market participation and subjective well-being of maize farmers

被引:5
|
作者
Li, Junpeng [1 ]
Ma, Wanglin [2 ]
Gong, Binlei [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Huaiyin Normal Univ, Business Sch, Huaian 223301, Peoples R China
[2] Lincoln Univ, Fac Agribusiness & Commerce, Dept Global Value Chains & Trade, Christchurch, New Zealand
[3] China Acad Rural Dev, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Publ Affairs, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Market participation; Sales ratio; Subjective well-being; Conditional mixed process model; SMALLHOLDER FARMERS; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; LIFE-SATISFACTION; COMMERCIALIZATION; AGGREGATION; SHOCKS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.eap.2023.09.037
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study explores how maize farmers' market participation influences their subjective well-being, utilizing the 2020 China Rural Revitalization Survey data collected by the Chinese Academy of Social Science. Three variables, including market participation (a binary variable), sales ratio (a continuous variable), and sales frequency (a categorical variable), are utilized to measure maize farmers' market participation patterns com-prehensively By estimating a conditional mixed process model, this study finds that maize farmers' market participation significantly improves their subjective well-being captured by happiness, life satisfaction, and confidence about the future by 0.672, 0.925, and 1.125 points, respectively. Maize income mediates the positive association between farmers' market participation and their subjective well-being. The disaggregated analyses reveal that farmers at the household income tertiles 2 and 3 obtain a higher level of happiness, life satisfaction, and confidence about the future. Meanwhile, market participation significantly improves life satisfaction and confidence about the future of farmers experiencing natural disasters, while it increases the happiness of farmers who do not have such experiences. Farmers' market participation significantly improves their objective well-being regarding pork consumption and milk consumption by 68 g/capita/day and 56 g/capita/day, respectively. Further analysis confirms that market participation intensity, reflected by sales ratio and frequency, significantly increases farmers' subjective well-being. These findings highlight that the government should devote more efforts to inciting maize farmers to participate in market transactions to increase farmers' incomes and subjective well-being.(c) 2023 Economic Society of Australia, Queensland. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:941 / 960
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Economy and Subjective Well-Being
    You, Meiqin
    Miao, Yuanjiang
    Zhu, Xiaohong
    2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING (ESME 2011), VOLS 1-5, 2011, : 2675 - 2679
  • [42] Psychopathy and subjective well-being
    Love, Ashley B.
    Holder, Mark D.
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2014, 66 : 112 - 117
  • [43] SUBJECTIVE MEASURES OF WELL-BEING
    CAMPBELL, A
    AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1976, 31 (02) : 117 - 124
  • [44] The science of subjective well-being
    Adu-Gyamfi, Samuel
    AFRICAN REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE-AREF, 2015, 7 (01): : 124 - 126
  • [45] In defence of subjective well-being
    Dolan, Paul
    HEALTH ECONOMICS POLICY AND LAW, 2008, 3 (01) : 93 - 95
  • [46] The anatomy of subjective well-being
    van Praag, BMS
    Frijters, P
    Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2003, 51 (01) : 29 - 49
  • [47] Dimensions of Subjective Well-Being
    Kapteyn, Arie
    Lee, Jinkook
    Tassot, Caroline
    Vonkova, Hana
    Zamarro, Gema
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2015, 123 (03) : 625 - 660
  • [48] Pleasures and subjective well-being
    Oishi, S
    Schimmack, U
    Diener, E
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2001, 15 (02) : 153 - 167
  • [49] AGE AND SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING
    Hansen, T.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2010, 50 : 190 - 190
  • [50] Weekends and Subjective Well-Being
    John F. Helliwell
    Shun Wang
    Social Indicators Research, 2014, 116 : 389 - 407