Market participation and subjective well-being of maize farmers

被引:5
|
作者
Li, Junpeng [1 ]
Ma, Wanglin [2 ]
Gong, Binlei [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Huaiyin Normal Univ, Business Sch, Huaian 223301, Peoples R China
[2] Lincoln Univ, Fac Agribusiness & Commerce, Dept Global Value Chains & Trade, Christchurch, New Zealand
[3] China Acad Rural Dev, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Publ Affairs, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Market participation; Sales ratio; Subjective well-being; Conditional mixed process model; SMALLHOLDER FARMERS; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; LIFE-SATISFACTION; COMMERCIALIZATION; AGGREGATION; SHOCKS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.eap.2023.09.037
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study explores how maize farmers' market participation influences their subjective well-being, utilizing the 2020 China Rural Revitalization Survey data collected by the Chinese Academy of Social Science. Three variables, including market participation (a binary variable), sales ratio (a continuous variable), and sales frequency (a categorical variable), are utilized to measure maize farmers' market participation patterns com-prehensively By estimating a conditional mixed process model, this study finds that maize farmers' market participation significantly improves their subjective well-being captured by happiness, life satisfaction, and confidence about the future by 0.672, 0.925, and 1.125 points, respectively. Maize income mediates the positive association between farmers' market participation and their subjective well-being. The disaggregated analyses reveal that farmers at the household income tertiles 2 and 3 obtain a higher level of happiness, life satisfaction, and confidence about the future. Meanwhile, market participation significantly improves life satisfaction and confidence about the future of farmers experiencing natural disasters, while it increases the happiness of farmers who do not have such experiences. Farmers' market participation significantly improves their objective well-being regarding pork consumption and milk consumption by 68 g/capita/day and 56 g/capita/day, respectively. Further analysis confirms that market participation intensity, reflected by sales ratio and frequency, significantly increases farmers' subjective well-being. These findings highlight that the government should devote more efforts to inciting maize farmers to participate in market transactions to increase farmers' incomes and subjective well-being.(c) 2023 Economic Society of Australia, Queensland. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:941 / 960
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The science of subjective well-being
    Yates, Greg
    Price, Debbie
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ADULT LEARNING, 2009, 49 (01) : 214 - 218
  • [32] Weekends and Subjective Well-Being
    Helliwell, John F.
    Wang, Shun
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2014, 116 (02) : 389 - 407
  • [33] Subjective Well-Being and Policy
    Bruno S. Frey
    Jana Gallus
    Topoi, 2013, 32 : 207 - 212
  • [34] Innovativeness and Subjective Well-Being
    Martin Binder
    Social Indicators Research, 2013, 111 : 561 - 578
  • [35] SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING AND EVENTS
    Yu, Nanyi Nicole
    Mair, Judith
    Lee, Andy
    Ong, Faith
    EVENT MANAGEMENT, 2022, 26 (01): : 7 - 24
  • [36] Subjective positive well-being
    Bech, Per
    WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 11 (02) : 105 - 106
  • [37] Culture and subjective well-being
    Brinkman, R
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ISSUES, 2002, 36 (03) : 830 - 833
  • [38] Measuring Subjective Well-Being
    Layard, Richard
    SCIENCE, 2010, 327 (5965) : 534 - 535
  • [39] Retirement and subjective well-being
    Bonsang, Eric
    Klein, Tobias J.
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2012, 83 (03) : 311 - 329
  • [40] Subjective Well-Being of Orphans
    Dahlan, Tina Hayati
    Wyandini, Diah Zaleha
    Hasanah, Viena Rusmiati
    ADVANCED SCIENCE LETTERS, 2019, 25 (01) : 216 - 220