Development of ambiguity aversion from early adolescence to adulthood: New insights from the Ellsberg paradox

被引:1
作者
Osmont, Anais [1 ]
Cassotti, Mathieu [2 ]
机构
[1] Aix Marseille Univ, PSYCLE, EA3273, Aix En Provence, France
[2] Univ Paris, CNRS, Unit 8240, LaPsyDE, Paris, France
关键词
Adolescence; decision-making; ambiguity aversion; risk-taking; Ellsberg paradox; RISK-TAKING; DECISION-MAKING; UNCERTAINTY; PREFERENCES; SYSTEMS; CHOICE; FRAMES;
D O I
10.1177/01650254221104056
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
This research aimed to clarify whether middle adolescents' risk-taking is driven by reduced ambiguity aversion. In Study 1, we explored the development of ambiguity aversion using an adaptation of the classic Ellsberg paradox with early adolescents (10-11 years old), middle adolescents (14-16 years old), and young adults (20-25 years old). Study 2 examined the development of ambiguity aversion depending on the ambiguity level in middle adolescence compared with adults. These two studies revealed that only early adolescents did not demonstrate ambiguity aversion. In contrast, middle adolescents and adults showed strong ambiguity aversion irrespective of ambiguity level. These findings support the idea that the period of young adolescence could be the start of ambiguity aversion development, although this tendency to avoid ambiguous options is already developed in middle adolescence. This finding might have important public health implications and suggests that prevention campaigns should consider early adolescence to be a particularly vulnerable age group for risky behaviors.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 58
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Resolving ambiguity: Broadening the consideration of risky decision making over adolescent development [J].
Blankenstein, Neeltje E. ;
Huettel, Scott A. ;
Li, Rosa .
DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW, 2021, 62
[2]   Neural tracking of subjective value under riskand ambiguity in adolescence [J].
Blankenstein, Neeltje E. ;
van Duijvenvoorde, Anna C. K. .
COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 19 (06) :1364-1378
[3]   Dealing With Uncertainty: Testing Risk-and Ambiguity-Attitude Across Adolescence [J].
Blankenstein, Neeltje E. ;
Crone, Eveline A. ;
van den Bos, Wouter ;
van Duijvenvoorde, Anna C. K. .
DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 41 (1-2) :77-92
[4]   Developmental patterns of change in the influence of safe and risky peer choices on risky decision-making [J].
Braams, Barbara R. ;
Davidow, Juliet Y. ;
Somerville, Leah H. .
DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2019, 22 (01)
[5]   Longitudinal Changes in Adolescent Risk-Taking: A Comprehensive Study of Neural Responses to Rewards, Pubertal Development, and Risk-Taking Behavior [J].
Braams, Barbara R. ;
van Duijvenvoorde, Anna C. K. ;
Peper, Jiska S. ;
Crone, Eveline A. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 35 (18) :7226-7238
[6]   RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MODELING PREFERENCES - UNCERTAINTY AND AMBIGUITY [J].
CAMERER, C ;
WEBER, M .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1992, 5 (04) :325-370
[7]   Positive Emotional Context Eliminates the Framing Effect in Decision-Making [J].
Cassotti, Mathieu ;
Habib, Marianne ;
Poirel, Nicolas ;
Aite, Ania ;
Houde, Olivier ;
Moutier, Sylvain .
EMOTION, 2012, 12 (05) :926-931
[8]   Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain [J].
De Martino, Benedetto ;
Kumaran, Dharshan ;
Seymour, Ben ;
Dolan, Raymond J. .
SCIENCE, 2006, 313 (5787) :684-687
[9]   Dual processing in reasoning - Two systems but one reasoner [J].
de Neys, W .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 17 (05) :428-433
[10]   Bias and Conflict: A Case for Logical Intuitions [J].
De Neys, Wim .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 7 (01) :28-38