Development of complexity management strategies for construction projects

被引:19
作者
Kermanshachi, Sharareh [1 ]
Nipa, Thahomina Jahan [1 ]
Bac Dao [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Arlington, Dept Civil Engn, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
[2] FPT Univ, FPT Sch Business & Technol, Hanoi, Vietnam
关键词
Delphi technique; Project complexity; Complexity indicator; Complexity management strategies; IDENTIFICATION; PERFORMANCE; UNCERTAINTY; DIMENSIONS; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1108/JEDT-06-2021-0324
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this study is to ascertain and list the most effective management strategies in efficiently handling the project complexities to enhance the performance of the project. Design/methodology/approach To fulfill the aim of this study, a comprehensive literature review was conducted, and the qualitative Delphi technique in two rounds was applied. Participants of the Delphi technique consisted of 12 subject matter experts (SMEs) with cumulative experience of 250 years in working in construction projects. In the first round of the Delphi technique, SMEs were asked to provide complexity management strategies to address the complexities due to 37 complexity indicators (CIs) under 11 complexity categories. In the second round of the Delphi technique, SMEs identified the top three management strategies for each of the 37 CIs. Findings This study collected the outcome of the two-round Delphi technique and based on the output developed the list of strategies to manage complexities related to each indicator. For example, establishing a well-informed governance team, assigning a Project Manager (PM) when the number of projects is more than one in an organization, and assigning a PM efficient enough to communicate with higher authority effectively will help in managing complexity that arises due to faulty assessment of the influence of a project on the organization's overall success. Originality/value This study will help practitioners in effectively managing the project complexities, and thus will reduce the monetary loss associated with project complexities.
引用
收藏
页码:1633 / 1657
页数:25
相关论文
共 57 条
[22]   Project Complexity Mapping in Five Dimensions for Complex Transportation Projects [J].
Gransberg, Douglas D. ;
Shane, Jennifer S. ;
Strong, Kelly ;
del Puerto, Carla Lopez .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2013, 29 (04) :316-326
[23]   Qualitative Research: Application of the Delphi Method to CEM Research [J].
Hallowell, Matthew R. ;
Gambatese, John A. .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 136 (01) :99-107
[24]   From Construction Megaproject Management to Complex Project Management: Bibliographic Analysis [J].
Hu, Yi ;
Chan, Albert P. C. ;
Le, Yun ;
Jin, Run-zhi .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2015, 31 (04)
[25]  
Hussein B.A., 2012, P IWAMA 2012 2 INT W, P335
[26]  
Iglesias, 2018, COMPLEXITY, V2018
[27]  
Kermanshachi Sharareh, 2020, International Journal of Construction Education and Research, V16, P24, DOI 10.1080/15578771.2018.1499568
[28]   Application of Delphi Method in Identifying, Ranking, and Weighting Project Complexity Indicators for Construction Projects [J].
Kermanshachi, Sharareh ;
Rouhanizadeh, Behzad ;
Dao, Bac .
JOURNAL OF LEGAL AFFAIRS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 12 (01)
[29]   IDENTIFICATION AND QUANTIFICATION OF PROJECT COMPLEXITY FROM PERSPECTIVE OF PRIMARY STAKEHOLDERS IN US CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS [J].
Kermanshachi, Sharareh ;
Safapour, Elnaz .
JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 25 (04) :380-398
[30]   An Empirical Study into Identifying Project Complexity Management Strategies [J].
Kermanshachi, Sharareh ;
Dao, Bac ;
Shane, Jennifer ;
Anderson, Stuart .
ICSDEC 2016 - INTEGRATING DATA SCIENCE, CONSTRUCTION AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 145 :603-610