Evaluation of FAPI PET imaging in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:23
作者
Ruan, Dan [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Liang [1 ,2 ]
Cai, Jiayu [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Weizhi [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Long [1 ,2 ]
Li, Jiayi [3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Jingjing [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Chen, Xiaoyuan [5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Chen, Haojun [1 ,2 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Sch Med, Dept Nucl Med, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Univ, Sch Med, Affiliated Hosp 1, Minnan PET Ctr,Xiamen Key Lab Radiopharmaceut, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Med Univ, Sch Clin Med, Fuzhou 350004, Peoples R China
[4] Xiamen Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[5] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Singapore, Singapore
[6] Natl Univ Singapore, Fac Engn, Singapore, Singapore
[7] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Ctr Translat Med, Clin Imaging Res Ctr, Singapore, Singapore
[8] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Nanomed Translat Res Program, NUS Ctr Nanomed, Singapore, Singapore
[9] Chinese Acad Sci, Xiamen Inst Rare Earth Mat, Haixi Inst, Xiamen Key Lab Rare Earth Photoelectr Funct Mat, Xiamen, Peoples R China
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
fibroblast activation protein; Ga-68-FAPI; F-18-FDG; gastric cancer; PET/CT; FIBROBLAST ACTIVATION PROTEIN; PHYSIOLOGICAL UPTAKE; FDG-PET/CT; TUMOR; CARCINOMA; STOMACH; PATIENT; TOMOGRAPHY; DISTENSION; CT;
D O I
10.7150/thno.88335
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Purpose: Recent studies suggest that Ga-68-FAPI PET/CT demonstrated superiority over F-18-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of various cancer types, especially in gastric cancer (GC). By comprehensively reviewing and analysing the differences between 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG in GC, some evidence is provided to foster the broader clinical application of FAPI PET imaging. Methods: In this review, studies published up to July 3, 2023, that employed radionuclide labelled FAPI as a diagnostic radiotracer for PET in GC were analysed. These studies were sourced from both the PubMed and Web of Science databases. Our statistical analysis involved a bivariate meta-analysis of the diagnostic data and a meta-analysis of the quantitative metrics. These were performed using R language. Results: The meta-analysis included 14 studies, with 527 patients, of which 358 were diagnosed with GC. Overall, 68Ga-FAPI showed higher pooled sensitivity (0.84 [95% CI 0.67-0.94] vs. 0.46 [95% CI 0.32-0.60]), specificity (0.91 [95% CI 0.76-0.98] vs. 0.88 [95% CI 0.74-0.96]) and area under the curve (AUC) (0.92 [95% CI 0.77-0.98] vs. 0.52 [95% CI 0.38-0.86]) than F-18-FDG. The evidence showed superior pooled sensitivities of Ga-68-FAPI PET over F-18-FDG for primary tumours, local recurrence, lymph node metastases, distant metastases, and peritoneal metastases. Furthermore, Ga-68-FAPI PET provided higher maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and tumour-to-background ratios (TBR). For bone metastases, while Ga-68-FAPI PET demonstrated slightly lower patient-based pooled sensitivity (0.93 vs. 1.00), it significantly outperformed 18F-FDG in the lesion-based analysis (0.95 vs. 0.65). However, SUVmax (mean difference [MD] 1.79 [95% CI -3.87-7.45]) and TBR (MD 5.01 [95% CI -0.78-10.80]) of bone metastases showed no significant difference between Ga-68-FAPI PET/CT and F-18-FDG PET/CT. Conclusion: Compared with F-18-FDG, Ga-68-FAPI PET imaging showed improved diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of GC. It can be effectively applied to the early diagnosis, initial staging, and detection of recurrence/metastases of GC. Ga-68-FAPI may have the potential of replacing F-18-FDG in GC in future applications.
引用
收藏
页码:4694 / 4710
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Epidemiology of gastric cancer in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol [J].
Celestin Danwang ;
Jean Joel Bigna .
Systematic Reviews, 8
[42]   Physical Activity and Gastric Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Psaltopoulou, Theodora ;
Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, Ioannis ;
Tzanninis, Ioannis-Georgios ;
Kantzanou, Maria ;
Georgiadou, Despoina ;
Sergentanis, Theodoros N. .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE, 2016, 26 (06) :445-464
[43]   Altered MiRNA Expression in Gastric Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Wang, Qi-Xian ;
Zhu, You-Qing ;
Zhang, Hu ;
Xiao, Jun .
CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2015, 35 (03) :933-944
[44]   Fish consumption and the risk of gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Shengjun Wu ;
Jie Liang ;
Lei Zhang ;
Xia Zhu ;
Xufeng Liu ;
Danmin Miao .
BMC Cancer, 11
[45]   Epidemiology of gastric cancer in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol [J].
Danwang, Celestin ;
Bigna, Jean Joel .
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, 8 (01)
[46]   Metabolic syndrome and gastric cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Mariani, Marco ;
Sassano, Michele ;
Boccia, Stefania .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2021, 30 (03) :239-250
[47]   Sex Disparity in Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Luan, Xiaoyi ;
Niu, Penghui ;
Wang, Wanqing ;
Zhao, Lulu ;
Zhang, Xiaojie ;
Zhao, Dongbing ;
Chen, Yingtai .
JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 2022
[48]   Diagnostic performance of blue laser imaging for early detection of gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Shaik, Mohammed Rifat ;
Canakis, Andrew ;
Shaik, Nishat Anjum ;
Bomman, Shivanand ;
Dahiya, Dushyant Singh ;
Gorman, Emily ;
Bilal, Mohammad ;
Chandan, Saurabh .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 43 (05) :976-985
[49]   Diagnostic Imaging in the Evaluation of Asymptomatic Microhematuria: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Taylor, Jacob I. ;
Souter, Lesley H. ;
Barocas, Daniel A. ;
Boorjian, Stephen A. ;
Raman, Jay D. ;
Lotan, Yair .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 (06) :1099-1106
[50]   Head-To-Head Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT and FDG PET/CT for the Detection of Peritoneal Metastases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Zhao Gege ;
Wang Xueju ;
Bin, Ji .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2023, 220 (04) :490-498