Evaluation of FAPI PET imaging in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:23
作者
Ruan, Dan [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Liang [1 ,2 ]
Cai, Jiayu [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Weizhi [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Long [1 ,2 ]
Li, Jiayi [3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Jingjing [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Chen, Xiaoyuan [5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Chen, Haojun [1 ,2 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Sch Med, Dept Nucl Med, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Univ, Sch Med, Affiliated Hosp 1, Minnan PET Ctr,Xiamen Key Lab Radiopharmaceut, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Med Univ, Sch Clin Med, Fuzhou 350004, Peoples R China
[4] Xiamen Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[5] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Singapore, Singapore
[6] Natl Univ Singapore, Fac Engn, Singapore, Singapore
[7] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Ctr Translat Med, Clin Imaging Res Ctr, Singapore, Singapore
[8] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Nanomed Translat Res Program, NUS Ctr Nanomed, Singapore, Singapore
[9] Chinese Acad Sci, Xiamen Inst Rare Earth Mat, Haixi Inst, Xiamen Key Lab Rare Earth Photoelectr Funct Mat, Xiamen, Peoples R China
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
fibroblast activation protein; Ga-68-FAPI; F-18-FDG; gastric cancer; PET/CT; FIBROBLAST ACTIVATION PROTEIN; PHYSIOLOGICAL UPTAKE; FDG-PET/CT; TUMOR; CARCINOMA; STOMACH; PATIENT; TOMOGRAPHY; DISTENSION; CT;
D O I
10.7150/thno.88335
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Purpose: Recent studies suggest that Ga-68-FAPI PET/CT demonstrated superiority over F-18-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of various cancer types, especially in gastric cancer (GC). By comprehensively reviewing and analysing the differences between 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG in GC, some evidence is provided to foster the broader clinical application of FAPI PET imaging. Methods: In this review, studies published up to July 3, 2023, that employed radionuclide labelled FAPI as a diagnostic radiotracer for PET in GC were analysed. These studies were sourced from both the PubMed and Web of Science databases. Our statistical analysis involved a bivariate meta-analysis of the diagnostic data and a meta-analysis of the quantitative metrics. These were performed using R language. Results: The meta-analysis included 14 studies, with 527 patients, of which 358 were diagnosed with GC. Overall, 68Ga-FAPI showed higher pooled sensitivity (0.84 [95% CI 0.67-0.94] vs. 0.46 [95% CI 0.32-0.60]), specificity (0.91 [95% CI 0.76-0.98] vs. 0.88 [95% CI 0.74-0.96]) and area under the curve (AUC) (0.92 [95% CI 0.77-0.98] vs. 0.52 [95% CI 0.38-0.86]) than F-18-FDG. The evidence showed superior pooled sensitivities of Ga-68-FAPI PET over F-18-FDG for primary tumours, local recurrence, lymph node metastases, distant metastases, and peritoneal metastases. Furthermore, Ga-68-FAPI PET provided higher maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and tumour-to-background ratios (TBR). For bone metastases, while Ga-68-FAPI PET demonstrated slightly lower patient-based pooled sensitivity (0.93 vs. 1.00), it significantly outperformed 18F-FDG in the lesion-based analysis (0.95 vs. 0.65). However, SUVmax (mean difference [MD] 1.79 [95% CI -3.87-7.45]) and TBR (MD 5.01 [95% CI -0.78-10.80]) of bone metastases showed no significant difference between Ga-68-FAPI PET/CT and F-18-FDG PET/CT. Conclusion: Compared with F-18-FDG, Ga-68-FAPI PET imaging showed improved diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of GC. It can be effectively applied to the early diagnosis, initial staging, and detection of recurrence/metastases of GC. Ga-68-FAPI may have the potential of replacing F-18-FDG in GC in future applications.
引用
收藏
页码:4694 / 4710
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Head-to-head comparison of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET and [18F]FDG PET in the detection of cancer recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Wu, Qinchao ;
Wang, Chen ;
Huang, Chao ;
Li, Dan .
TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 13 (06) :2779-2789
[22]   18F-FDG PET or PET/CT for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Chang, Ming-Che ;
Chen, Jin-Hua ;
Liang, Ji-An ;
Yang, Kuang-Tao ;
Cheng, Kai-Yuan ;
Kao, Chia-Hung .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 81 (11) :3511-3517
[23]   Statins and the Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Su, Chun-Hsien ;
Islam, Md. Mohaimenul ;
Jia, Guhua ;
Wu, Chieh-Chen .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (23)
[24]   Gastric cancer and brain metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Fotakopoulos, George ;
Christodoulidis, Grigorios ;
Georgakopoulou, Vasiliki Epameinondas ;
Trakas, Nikolaos ;
Skapani, Pagona ;
Panagiotopoulos, Konstantinos ;
Spandidos, Demetrios A. ;
Foroglou, Nicolas .
MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 21 (05)
[25]   Palliative radiotherapy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Tey, Jeremy ;
Soon, Yu Yang ;
Koh, Wee Yao ;
Leong, Cheng Nang ;
Choo, Bok Ai ;
Ho, Francis ;
Vellayappan, Balamurugan ;
Lim, Keith ;
Tham, Ivan Wk .
ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (15) :25797-25805
[26]   The prognostic role of pretreatment thrombocytosis in gastric cancer A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Yang, Chen ;
Jiang, Hui ;
Huang, Shaozhuo ;
Hong, Hui ;
Huang, Xiaowen ;
Wang, Xiaojie ;
Liao, Weixin ;
Wang, Xueyi ;
Chen, Xuewen ;
Jiang, Liming .
MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (31)
[27]   Accuracy of 18-F-FDG PET imaging in the follow up of endometrial cancer patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature [J].
Kadkhodayan, Sima ;
Shahriari, Sara ;
Treglia, Giorgio ;
Yousefi, Zohreh ;
Sadeghi, Ramin .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 128 (02) :397-404
[28]   Risk for gastric cancer in patients with gastric atrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Sui, Ziqi ;
Chen, Jiamin ;
Li, Peiwei ;
Shao, Liming ;
Ye, Jun ;
Lu, Xinliang ;
Cai, Jianting .
TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (03) :1618-1624
[29]   [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT in the evaluation of gastric cancer: comparison with [18F]FDG PET/CT [J].
Lin, Rong ;
Lin, Zefang ;
Chen, Zhenying ;
Zheng, Shan ;
Zhang, Jiaying ;
Zang, Jie ;
Miao, Weibing .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2022, 49 (08) :2960-2971
[30]   Systematic evaluation of the safety and therapeutic effects of para-aortic lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Zhou, H. Y. ;
Zhao, H. ;
Tang, M. M. ;
Peng, H. ;
Feng, X. ;
Ge, J. ;
Liu, H. L. .
EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 27 (11) :5211-5222