共 50 条
Evaluation of FAPI PET imaging in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
被引:10
作者:
Ruan, Dan
[1
,2
]
Zhao, Liang
[1
,2
]
Cai, Jiayu
[1
,2
]
Xu, Weizhi
[1
,2
]
Sun, Long
[1
,2
]
Li, Jiayi
[3
,4
]
Zhang, Jingjing
[5
,6
,7
]
Chen, Xiaoyuan
[5
,6
,7
,8
]
Chen, Haojun
[1
,2
,9
]
机构:
[1] Xiamen Univ, Sch Med, Dept Nucl Med, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Univ, Sch Med, Affiliated Hosp 1, Minnan PET Ctr,Xiamen Key Lab Radiopharmaceut, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Med Univ, Sch Clin Med, Fuzhou 350004, Peoples R China
[4] Xiamen Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[5] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Singapore, Singapore
[6] Natl Univ Singapore, Fac Engn, Singapore, Singapore
[7] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Ctr Translat Med, Clin Imaging Res Ctr, Singapore, Singapore
[8] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Nanomed Translat Res Program, NUS Ctr Nanomed, Singapore, Singapore
[9] Chinese Acad Sci, Xiamen Inst Rare Earth Mat, Haixi Inst, Xiamen Key Lab Rare Earth Photoelectr Funct Mat, Xiamen, Peoples R China
来源:
THERANOSTICS
|
2023年
/
13卷
/
13期
基金:
英国医学研究理事会;
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词:
fibroblast activation protein;
Ga-68-FAPI;
F-18-FDG;
gastric cancer;
PET/CT;
FIBROBLAST ACTIVATION PROTEIN;
PHYSIOLOGICAL UPTAKE;
FDG-PET/CT;
TUMOR;
CARCINOMA;
STOMACH;
PATIENT;
TOMOGRAPHY;
DISTENSION;
CT;
D O I:
10.7150/thno.88335
中图分类号:
R-3 [医学研究方法];
R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号:
1001 ;
摘要:
Purpose: Recent studies suggest that Ga-68-FAPI PET/CT demonstrated superiority over F-18-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of various cancer types, especially in gastric cancer (GC). By comprehensively reviewing and analysing the differences between 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG in GC, some evidence is provided to foster the broader clinical application of FAPI PET imaging. Methods: In this review, studies published up to July 3, 2023, that employed radionuclide labelled FAPI as a diagnostic radiotracer for PET in GC were analysed. These studies were sourced from both the PubMed and Web of Science databases. Our statistical analysis involved a bivariate meta-analysis of the diagnostic data and a meta-analysis of the quantitative metrics. These were performed using R language. Results: The meta-analysis included 14 studies, with 527 patients, of which 358 were diagnosed with GC. Overall, 68Ga-FAPI showed higher pooled sensitivity (0.84 [95% CI 0.67-0.94] vs. 0.46 [95% CI 0.32-0.60]), specificity (0.91 [95% CI 0.76-0.98] vs. 0.88 [95% CI 0.74-0.96]) and area under the curve (AUC) (0.92 [95% CI 0.77-0.98] vs. 0.52 [95% CI 0.38-0.86]) than F-18-FDG. The evidence showed superior pooled sensitivities of Ga-68-FAPI PET over F-18-FDG for primary tumours, local recurrence, lymph node metastases, distant metastases, and peritoneal metastases. Furthermore, Ga-68-FAPI PET provided higher maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and tumour-to-background ratios (TBR). For bone metastases, while Ga-68-FAPI PET demonstrated slightly lower patient-based pooled sensitivity (0.93 vs. 1.00), it significantly outperformed 18F-FDG in the lesion-based analysis (0.95 vs. 0.65). However, SUVmax (mean difference [MD] 1.79 [95% CI -3.87-7.45]) and TBR (MD 5.01 [95% CI -0.78-10.80]) of bone metastases showed no significant difference between Ga-68-FAPI PET/CT and F-18-FDG PET/CT. Conclusion: Compared with F-18-FDG, Ga-68-FAPI PET imaging showed improved diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of GC. It can be effectively applied to the early diagnosis, initial staging, and detection of recurrence/metastases of GC. Ga-68-FAPI may have the potential of replacing F-18-FDG in GC in future applications.
引用
收藏
页码:4694 / 4710
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条