Evaluation of FAPI PET imaging in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:10
作者
Ruan, Dan [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Liang [1 ,2 ]
Cai, Jiayu [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Weizhi [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Long [1 ,2 ]
Li, Jiayi [3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Jingjing [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Chen, Xiaoyuan [5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Chen, Haojun [1 ,2 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Sch Med, Dept Nucl Med, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Univ, Sch Med, Affiliated Hosp 1, Minnan PET Ctr,Xiamen Key Lab Radiopharmaceut, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Med Univ, Sch Clin Med, Fuzhou 350004, Peoples R China
[4] Xiamen Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[5] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Singapore, Singapore
[6] Natl Univ Singapore, Fac Engn, Singapore, Singapore
[7] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Ctr Translat Med, Clin Imaging Res Ctr, Singapore, Singapore
[8] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Nanomed Translat Res Program, NUS Ctr Nanomed, Singapore, Singapore
[9] Chinese Acad Sci, Xiamen Inst Rare Earth Mat, Haixi Inst, Xiamen Key Lab Rare Earth Photoelectr Funct Mat, Xiamen, Peoples R China
来源
THERANOSTICS | 2023年 / 13卷 / 13期
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
fibroblast activation protein; Ga-68-FAPI; F-18-FDG; gastric cancer; PET/CT; FIBROBLAST ACTIVATION PROTEIN; PHYSIOLOGICAL UPTAKE; FDG-PET/CT; TUMOR; CARCINOMA; STOMACH; PATIENT; TOMOGRAPHY; DISTENSION; CT;
D O I
10.7150/thno.88335
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Purpose: Recent studies suggest that Ga-68-FAPI PET/CT demonstrated superiority over F-18-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of various cancer types, especially in gastric cancer (GC). By comprehensively reviewing and analysing the differences between 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG in GC, some evidence is provided to foster the broader clinical application of FAPI PET imaging. Methods: In this review, studies published up to July 3, 2023, that employed radionuclide labelled FAPI as a diagnostic radiotracer for PET in GC were analysed. These studies were sourced from both the PubMed and Web of Science databases. Our statistical analysis involved a bivariate meta-analysis of the diagnostic data and a meta-analysis of the quantitative metrics. These were performed using R language. Results: The meta-analysis included 14 studies, with 527 patients, of which 358 were diagnosed with GC. Overall, 68Ga-FAPI showed higher pooled sensitivity (0.84 [95% CI 0.67-0.94] vs. 0.46 [95% CI 0.32-0.60]), specificity (0.91 [95% CI 0.76-0.98] vs. 0.88 [95% CI 0.74-0.96]) and area under the curve (AUC) (0.92 [95% CI 0.77-0.98] vs. 0.52 [95% CI 0.38-0.86]) than F-18-FDG. The evidence showed superior pooled sensitivities of Ga-68-FAPI PET over F-18-FDG for primary tumours, local recurrence, lymph node metastases, distant metastases, and peritoneal metastases. Furthermore, Ga-68-FAPI PET provided higher maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and tumour-to-background ratios (TBR). For bone metastases, while Ga-68-FAPI PET demonstrated slightly lower patient-based pooled sensitivity (0.93 vs. 1.00), it significantly outperformed 18F-FDG in the lesion-based analysis (0.95 vs. 0.65). However, SUVmax (mean difference [MD] 1.79 [95% CI -3.87-7.45]) and TBR (MD 5.01 [95% CI -0.78-10.80]) of bone metastases showed no significant difference between Ga-68-FAPI PET/CT and F-18-FDG PET/CT. Conclusion: Compared with F-18-FDG, Ga-68-FAPI PET imaging showed improved diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of GC. It can be effectively applied to the early diagnosis, initial staging, and detection of recurrence/metastases of GC. Ga-68-FAPI may have the potential of replacing F-18-FDG in GC in future applications.
引用
收藏
页码:4694 / 4710
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chang, Ming-Che
    Chen, Jin-Hua
    Liang, Ji-An
    Yang, Kuang-Tao
    Cheng, Kai-Yuan
    Kao, Chia-Hung
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 81 (11) : 3511 - 3517
  • [22] Statins and the Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Su, Chun-Hsien
    Islam, Md. Mohaimenul
    Jia, Guhua
    Wu, Chieh-Chen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (23)
  • [23] Gastric cancer and brain metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fotakopoulos, George
    Christodoulidis, Grigorios
    Georgakopoulou, Vasiliki Epameinondas
    Trakas, Nikolaos
    Skapani, Pagona
    Panagiotopoulos, Konstantinos
    Spandidos, Demetrios A.
    Foroglou, Nicolas
    MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 21 (05)
  • [24] Palliative radiotherapy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tey, Jeremy
    Soon, Yu Yang
    Koh, Wee Yao
    Leong, Cheng Nang
    Choo, Bok Ai
    Ho, Francis
    Vellayappan, Balamurugan
    Lim, Keith
    Tham, Ivan Wk
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (15) : 25797 - 25805
  • [25] The prognostic role of pretreatment thrombocytosis in gastric cancer A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Chen
    Jiang, Hui
    Huang, Shaozhuo
    Hong, Hui
    Huang, Xiaowen
    Wang, Xiaojie
    Liao, Weixin
    Wang, Xueyi
    Chen, Xuewen
    Jiang, Liming
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (31)
  • [26] Accuracy of 18-F-FDG PET imaging in the follow up of endometrial cancer patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature
    Kadkhodayan, Sima
    Shahriari, Sara
    Treglia, Giorgio
    Yousefi, Zohreh
    Sadeghi, Ramin
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 128 (02) : 397 - 404
  • [27] Risk for gastric cancer in patients with gastric atrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sui, Ziqi
    Chen, Jiamin
    Li, Peiwei
    Shao, Liming
    Ye, Jun
    Lu, Xinliang
    Cai, Jianting
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (03) : 1618 - 1624
  • [28] [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT in the evaluation of gastric cancer: comparison with [18F]FDG PET/CT
    Lin, Rong
    Lin, Zefang
    Chen, Zhenying
    Zheng, Shan
    Zhang, Jiaying
    Zang, Jie
    Miao, Weibing
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2022, 49 (08) : 2960 - 2971
  • [29] Diagnostic Performance of Radiolabelled FAPI Versus [18F]FDG PET Imaging in Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Oncology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Henrar, Rutger B.
    Vuijk, Floris A.
    Burchell, George L.
    van Dieren, Susan
    de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee
    Kazemier, Geert
    Vahrmeijer, Alexander L.
    Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.
    Swijnenburg, Rutger-Jan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2025, 26 (05)
  • [30] Systematic evaluation of the safety and therapeutic effects of para-aortic lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhou, H. Y.
    Zhao, H.
    Tang, M. M.
    Peng, H.
    Feng, X.
    Ge, J.
    Liu, H. L.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 27 (11) : 5211 - 5222