Safety evaluation of the food enzyme inulinase from the genetically modified Aspergillus oryzae strain MUCL 44346

被引:0
作者
Lambre, Claude
Barat Baviera, Jose Manuel
Bolognesi, Claudia
Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro
Crebelli, Riccardo
Gott, David Michael
Grob, Konrad
Lampi, Evgenia
Mengelers, Marcel
Mortensen, Alicja
Riviere, Gilles
Steffensen, Inger-Lise
Tlustos, Christina
Van Loveren, Henk
Vernis, Laurence
Zorn, Holger
Herman, Lieve
Roos, Yrjoe
Aguilera, Jaime
Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena
Arcella, Davide
Kovalkovicova, Natalia
Liu, Yi
Pena, Claudia Roncancio
Chesson, Andrew
机构
关键词
food enzyme; inulinase; 1-beta-D-fructan fructanohydrolase; EC; 3.2.1.7; Aspergillus oryzae; genetically modified microorganism;
D O I
10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8148
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The food enzyme inulinase (1-beta-D-fructan fructanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.7) is produced with the genetically modified Aspergillus oryzae strain MUCL 44346 by PURATOS NV. The genetic modifications do not give rise to safety concerns. The food enzyme is free from viable cells of the production organism and its DNA. It is intended to be used in the production of fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) from inulin extracted from chicory roots. Dietary exposure to the food enzyme-total organic solids (TOS) was estimated to be up to 0.01 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. Genotoxicity tests did not indicate a safety concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90-day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) of 100 mg TOS/kg bw per day, which when compared with the estimated dietary exposure, resulted in a margin of exposure of at least 10,000. A search for the similarity of the amino acid sequence of the food enzyme to known allergens was made and two matches were found with tomato allergens. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic reactions upon dietary exposure to this food enzyme, particularly in individuals sensitised to tomato, cannot be excluded. However, the likelihood of allergic reactions is expected not to exceed the likelihood of allergic reactions to tomato. As the prevalence of allergic reactions to tomato is low, also the likelihood of such reactions to occur to the food enzyme is low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use. (c) 2023 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by Wiley-VCH GmbH on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Guidance of the Scientific Panel of Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF) on the Submission of a Dossier on Food Enzymes for Safety Evaluation by the Scientific Panel of Food Contact Material, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids
    Anadon, Arturo
    Bell, David
    Binderup, Mona-Lise
    Bursch, Wilfried
    Castle, Laurence
    Crebelli, Riccardo
    Engel, Karl-Heinz
    Franz, Roland
    Gontard, Nathalie
    Haertle, Thomas
    Husoy, Trine
    Jany, Klaus-Dieter
    Leclercq, Catherine
    Lhuguenot, Jean-Claude
    Mennes, Wim C.
    Milana, Maria Rosaria
    Pfaff, Karla
    Svensson, Kettil
    Toldra, Fidel
    Waring, Rosemary
    Woelfle, Detlef
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2009, 7 (08)
  • [2] Scientific Opinion on the assessment of allergenicity of GM plants and microorganisms and derived food and feed EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel)
    Andersson, Hans Christer
    Arpaia, Salvatore
    Bartsch, Detlef
    Casacuberta, Josep
    Davies, Howard
    du Jardin, Patrick
    Flachowsky, Gerhard
    Herman, Lieve
    Jones, Huw
    Karenlampi, Sirpa
    Kiss, Jozsef
    Kleter, Gijs
    Kuiper, Harry
    Messean, Antoine
    Nielsen, Kaare Magne
    Perry, Joe
    Poeting, Annette
    Sweet, Jeremy
    Tebbe, Christoph
    von Wright, Atte Johannes
    Wal, Jean-Michel
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2010, 8 (07)
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264264861-EN
  • [4] Asero R, 2008, J INVEST ALLERG CLIN, V18, P397
  • [5] Airborne allergy to tomato proteins
    Asero, R.
    Mistrello, G.
    Amato, S.
    [J]. ALLERGY, 2010, 65 (12) : 1626 - 1627
  • [6] Guidance of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA related to Uncertainties in Dietary Exposure Assessment Request No EFSA-Q-2004-019 Adopted on 14 December 2006
    Barlow, Sue
    Chesson, Andrew
    Collins, John
    Dybing, Erik
    Flynn, Albert
    Fruijtier-Polloth, Claudia
    Hardy, Tony
    Knaap, Ada
    Kuiper, Harry
    Le Neindre, Pierre
    Schans, Jan
    Schlatter, Josef
    Silano, Vittorio
    Skerving, Steffan
    Vannier, Philippe
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2007, 5 (01)
  • [7] Guidance on Safety assessment of botanicals and botanical preparations intended for use as ingredients in food supplements
    Barlow, Susan
    Chesson, Andrew
    Collins, John D.
    Flynn, Albert
    Galli, Corrado L.
    Hardy, Anthony
    Jany, Klaus-Dieter
    Jeger, Michael-John
    Knaap, Ada
    Kuiper, Harry
    Larsen, John-Christian
    Lovell, David
    Schlatter, Josef
    Silano, Vittorio
    Smulders, Frans
    Vannier, Philippe
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2009, 7 (09)
  • [8] EFSA CEP Panel(EFSA Panelon Food Contact Materials Enzymes and Processing Aids), 2019, EFSA J, V17, DOI [10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5741, DOI 10.2903/J.EFSA.2019.5741]
  • [10] FAO/WHO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health Organization), 2006, FAO JECFA MON, V3, P63