Teaching Presence in Asynchronous Online Classes: It's Not Just a Facade

被引:63
作者
Watson, Sharon [1 ]
Sullivan, Daniel P. [1 ]
Watson, Kathryn [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[2] Univ Colorado Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO USA
来源
ONLINE LEARNING | 2023年 / 27卷 / 02期
关键词
teaching presence; asynchronous online classes; Community of Inquiry; INSTRUCTOR PRESENCE; PERCEPTION; STRATEGIES; ENGAGEMENT; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.2190/V0LB-1M37-RNR8-Y2U1
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The expanding scale and scope of online education options, both in terms of design and delivery, create significant questions that increasingly warrant research attention. Previous research has demonstrated that higher levels of teaching presence in online courses is positively related to student engagement, satisfaction and learning. Although there are many methods for infusing one's teaching presence into an online class, practicalities constrain choices. The purpose of this study is to identify and assess those methods students perceive to be the most valuable. We empirically investigate students' perceptions and evaluative judgments of a range of methods of setting and sustaining teaching presence in an online asynchronous course. Post hoc factor analysis of our data suggests refining our understanding of teaching presence in terms of stylistic versus substantive methods. Analyses of student survey data indicate that, while students see value in both types of teaching presence, they perceive significantly greater benefit from substantive relative to stylistic methods.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 303
页数:16
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Anderson T., 2001, J ASYNCHRONOUS LEARN, V5, P1, DOI DOI 10.24059/OLJ.V5I2.1875
[2]  
Baker C., 2010, J ED ONLINE, V7, P1
[3]   The influence of social presence and teaching presence on the quality of online critical inquiry [J].
Bangert A. .
Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 2008, 20 (1) :34-61
[4]   A meta-analysis addressing the relationship between teaching presence and students' satisfaction and learning [J].
Caskurlu, Secil ;
Maeda, Yukiko ;
Richardson, Jennifer C. ;
Lv, Jing .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2020, 157
[5]  
Cormier Dave, 2010, EDUCAUSE Review, V45, P31
[6]   Online teaching: advantages, obstacles and tools for getting it right [J].
Davis, Nicole L. ;
Gough, Mimi ;
Taylor, Lorraine L. .
JOURNAL OF TEACHING IN TRAVEL & TOURISM, 2019, 19 (03) :256-263
[7]  
Dixson M.D., 2010, Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, V10, P1
[8]  
Dockter Jason, 2016, Computers and Composition, V40, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.compcom.2016.03.009
[9]   Facilitating Cognitive Presence in Online Learning: Interaction Is Not Enough [J].
Garrison, D. Randy ;
Cleveland-Innes, Martha .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION, 2005, 19 (03) :133-148
[10]  
Garrison DR., 2001, AM J DISTANCE EDUC, V15, P7, DOI [10.1080/08923640109527071, DOI 10.1080/08923640109527071]