Clinical Predictive Factors of Failure of Hysteroscopic Endometrial Ablation: Retrospective Cohort Study at a Tertiary University Hospital

被引:0
作者
Al-Husban, Naser [1 ]
Abukhalaf, Ala' [2 ]
Nada, Rama [2 ]
Alqirem, Lina [2 ]
Alshrouf, Mohammad [2 ]
Al-Husban, Hedaieh [2 ]
Dahan, Michael H. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jordan, Sch Med, Obstet & Gynaecol Dept, Amman 13046, Jordan
[2] Jordan Univ Hosp, Obstet & Gynaecol Dept, Amman 11942, Jordan
[3] Ibn Al Haitham Hosp, Obstet & Gynaecol Dept, Amman 11194, Jordan
关键词
endometrial; ablation; hysteroscopic; rollerball; uterine; adenomyosis; EPISODE STATISTICS; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; HYSTERECTOMY; MENORRHAGIA; RESECTION; WOMEN; BALL;
D O I
10.31083/j.ceog5001003
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Endometrial ablation is a safe and effective minimally invasive surgical procedure. Despite the high success rate of endometrial ablation for heavy uterine bleeding management, some patients experience persistent symptoms after the procedure, ne-cessitating a hysterectomy. The aim of this study is to determine the pre-operative clinical predictive factors of failure of endometrial ablation in the management of uterine bleeding. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of endometrial ablation procedures performed for treating heavy uterine bleeding. Results: Ninety five patients were included in the study. The failure rate was 24.2%. There was a statistically significant association between ablation failure and fluid deficit (p = 0.002) and intra-operative blood loss (p = 0.047). There was a statistically significant moderate association between adenomyosis (p = 0.003, (p = 0.37) and failed endometrial ablation. However, the age, body mass index (BMI), parity, number of miscarriages, number of cesarean sections, uterine length, endometrial thickness and procedure duration had no significant association with endometrial ablation. There was no significant relationship between the uterine abnormalities in general and the outcome of the endometrial ablation (p = 0.637). However, patients with combined adenomyosis and dysmenorrhea had a statistically significant association with outcome of the endometrial ablation (p = 0.016, (p = 0.28) and were more likely to have a failed endometrial ablation (crude odds ratio (COR) = 4.67, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.35-16.09). Logistic regres-sion to adjust for related factors revealed that the adenomyosis (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 50.83, 95% CI, 3.64-706.75, p = 0.003) and fluid deficit (AOR = 1.003, 95% CI, 1.000-1.006, p = 0.044) had a higher likelihood of an unsuccessful outcome. Hysterectomy was performed in 47.8% of patients who had failure of the ablation. Conclusions: Among pre-operative factors, adenomyosis, fluid deficit and combined adenomyosis and dysmenorrhea were found to predict failure of hysteroscopic endometrial ablation. Clinical Trial Registration: It was registered in https://www.clinicaltrials.gov database with Identifier: NCT05483348.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2021, International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM)
  • [2] Prognostic Factors for the Failure of Endometrial Ablation A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Beelen, Pleun
    Reinders, Imke M. A.
    Scheepers, Wessel F. W.
    Herman, Malou C.
    Geomini, M. A. J.
    van Kuijk, Sander M. J.
    Bongers, Marlies Y.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 134 (06) : 1269 - 1281
  • [3] Endometrial ablation or resection versus levonorgestrel intra-uterine system for the treatment of women with heavy menstrual bleeding and a normal uterine cavity: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Bergeron, Catherine
    Laberge, Philippe Y.
    Boutin, Amelie
    Theriault, Marie-Anne
    Valcourt, Florence
    Lemyre, Madeleine
    Maheux-Lacroix, Sarah
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2020, 26 (02) : 302 - 311
  • [4] Bonafede Machaon M, 2015, J Comp Eff Res, V4, P115, DOI 10.2217/cer.14.81
  • [5] Hysteroscopy and heavy menstrual bleeding (to cover TCRE and second-generation endometrial ablation)
    Bongers, M. Y.
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 29 (07) : 930 - 939
  • [6] Microwave endometrial ablation vs. rollerball electroablation for menorrhagia: A multicenter randomized trial
    Cooper, JM
    Anderson, TL
    Fortin, CA
    Jack, SA
    Plentl, MB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 2004, 11 (03): : 394 - 403
  • [7] Outcomes following hysterectomy or endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics in Scotland
    Cooper, K.
    Lee, A. J.
    Chien, P.
    Raja, E. A.
    Timmaraju, V.
    Bhattacharya, S.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (10) : 1171 - 1179
  • [8] RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL COMPARING ENDOMETRIAL RESECTION WITH ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR THE SURGICAL-TREATMENT OF MENORRHAGIA
    DWYER, N
    HUTTON, J
    STIRRAT, GM
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1993, 100 (03): : 237 - 243
  • [9] Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding
    Fergusson, Rosalie J.
    Lethaby, Anne
    Shepperd, Sasha
    Farquhar, Cindy
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (11):
  • [10] Perioperative predictors of successful hysteroscopic endometrial ablation
    Gemer, Ofer
    Kruchkovich, Jenya
    Huerta, Michael
    Kapustian, Viki
    Kroll, Dov
    Anteby, Eyal
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2007, 63 (04) : 205 - 208