Use of smartphone application versus written titration charts for basal insulin titration in adults with type 2 diabetes and suboptimal glycaemic control (My Dose Coach): multicentre, open-label, parallel, randomised controlled trial

被引:4
作者
Hermanns, Norbert [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ehrmann, Dominic [1 ,3 ]
Finke-Groene, Katharina [1 ]
Krichbaum, Michael [1 ]
Roos, Timm [1 ]
Haak, Thomas [2 ]
Freckmann, Guido [4 ]
Kulzer, Bernhard [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Res Inst Diabet Acad Mergentheim FIDAM, Johann Hammer Str 24, D-97980 Bad Mergentheim, Germany
[2] Diabet Ctr Bad Mergentheim, Theodor Klotzbucherstr 12, D-97980 Bad Mergentheim, Germany
[3] Univ Bamberg, Dept Clin Psychol & Psychotherapy, Markuspl 3, D-96047 Bamberg, Germany
[4] IfDT Inst Diabet Technol Forsch & Entwicklungsgese, Helmholtzstr 20, D-89081 Ulm, Germany
来源
LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-EUROPE | 2023年 / 33卷
关键词
Type; 2; diabetes; Basal insulin; Insulin titration; Digital health tool; Titration app; My Dose Coach app; CLINICAL INERTIA; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100702
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The majority of people with type 2 diabetes who require insulin therapy use only basal insulin in combination with other anti-diabetic agents. We tested whether using a smartphone application to titrate insulin could improve glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes who use basal insulin.Methods This was a 12-week, multicentre, open-label, parallel, randomised controlled trial conducted in 36 diabetes practices in Germany. Eligible participants had type 2 diabetes, a BMI >= 25.0 kg/m(2), were on basal insulin therapy or were initiating basal insulin therapy, and had suboptimal glycaemic control (HbA1c >7.5%; 58.5 mmol/mol). Block randomisation with 1:1 allocation was performed centrally. Participants in the intervention group titrated their basal insulin dose using a smartphone application (My Dose Coach) for 12 weeks. Control group participants titrated their basal insulin dose according to a written titration chart. The primary outcome was the baseline-adjusted change in HbA1c at 12 weeks. The intention-to-treat analysis included all randomised participants.Results Between 13 July 2021 and 21 March 2022, 251 study participants were randomly assigned (control group: n = 123; intervention group: n = 128), and 236 completed the follow-up phase (control group: n = 119; intervention group: n = 117). Regarding the HbA1c a model-based adjusted between-group difference of -0.31% (95% CI: 0.01%-0.69%; p = 0.0388) in favour of the intervention group was observed. There were 30 adverse events reported: 16 in the control group, 14 in the intervention group. Of these, 15 adverse events were serious. No event was considered to be related to the investigational device.Interpretation Study results suggest that utilizing this digital health smartphone application for basal insulin titration may have resulted in a comparatively greater reduction in HbA1c levels among individuals with type 2 diabetes, as compared to basal insulin titration guided by a written titration schedule. No negative effect on safety outcomes was observed.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [31] Time for Using Machine Learning for Dose Guidance in Titration of People With Type 2 Diabetes? A Systematic Review of Basal Insulin Dose Guidance
    Thomsen, Camilla Heisel Nyholm
    Hangaard, Stine
    Kronborg, Thomas
    Vestergaard, Peter
    Hejlesen, Ole
    Jensen, Morten Hasselstrom
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIABETES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 18 (05): : 1185 - 1197