Multi-phase preventive maintenance strategy for leased equipment considering usage rate variation

被引:6
作者
Liu, Biyu [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Ting [1 ]
Yang, Haidong [1 ]
Zhang, Liangwei [3 ]
机构
[1] Fuzhou Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Fuzhou 350116, Peoples R China
[2] Fuzhou Univ, Logist Res Ctr, Fujian Social Sci Res Base, Fuzhou 350116, Peoples R China
[3] Dongguan Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn, Dongguan 523808, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Preventive maintenance; Leased equipment; Usage rate variation; Multi; -phase; Failure penalty; POLICY; WARRANTY; MODEL; CONTRACT; SYSTEMS; AGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cie.2023.109673
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Lessors are responsible for equipment maintenance during the lease period. The usage rate of these equipment affects their failures, reliability and decision-making on maintenance strategy. For some leased equipment, such as those producing seasonal products, the usage rate varies. However, conventional approaches usually set usage rate as a constant. Different from the existing literature, this work considers the variation of usage rate, and proposes a multi-phase preventive maintenance (PM) decision model to determine the PM times and degrees at different phases. The goal is to minimize lessors' lease service cost by balancing corrective maintenance (CM) cost, PM cost and penalty cost during the lease period. In this model, an age correspondence framework is applied to characterize the variation of usage rate at different phases. An accelerated failure time model and an age reduction model are adopted to capture the effect of variable usage rate and imperfect PM on the equipment's reliability. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed model, it is contrasted with a PM decision model with average usage rate. The impact of unit PM cost, CM cost, and penalty cost on maintenance strategy is discussed by numerical examples. Managerial insights for maintenance strategy are provided for lessors. The results indicate that the proposed approach considering varied usage rate can change the optimal PM times and degrees, and consequently lead to a lower lease service cost than conventional approaches using average usage rate; lessors need to enhance PM capability and reduce PM cost.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Optimal hybrid imperfect preventive maintenance policy for leased equipment [J].
Ben Mabrouk, A. ;
Chelbi, A. ;
Radhoui, M. .
IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2017, 50 (01) :13698-13703
[2]   Optimal imperfect preventive maintenance policy for equipment leased during successive periods [J].
Ben Mabrouk, A. ;
Chelbi, A. ;
Radhoui, M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2016, 54 (17) :5095-5110
[3]   Optimal imperfect maintenance strategy for leased equipment [J].
Ben Mabrouk, A. ;
Chelbi, A. ;
Radhoui, M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2016, 178 :57-64
[4]   Joint preventive maintenance and extended warranty strategy for leased unreliable equipment submitted to imperfect repair at failure [J].
Ben Mabrouk, Amel ;
Chelbi, Anis .
IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2022, 55 (10) :1201-1206
[5]   Optimal maintenance policy for equipment leased with base and extended warranty [J].
Ben Mabrouk, Amel ;
Chelbi, Anis .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2023, 61 (03) :898-909
[6]   Preventive maintenance model analysis on wind-turbine gearbox under stochastic disturbance [J].
Chen, Li ;
Su, Hongsheng ;
Huangfu, Lanlan .
ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 :224-231
[7]   Investigating reliability improvement of second-hand production equipment considering warranty and preventive maintenance strategies [J].
Darghouth, Mohamed Noomane ;
Chelbi, Anis ;
Ait-kadi, Daoud .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2017, 55 (16) :4643-4661
[8]   The Decision-Making for the Optimization of Finance Lease with Facilities' Two-Dimensional Deterioration [J].
Fang, Chih-Chiang ;
Hsu, Chin-Chia ;
Liu, Je-Hung .
SYSTEMS, 2022, 10 (06)
[10]   A hybrid preventive maintenance model for systems with partially observable degradation [J].
Finkelstein, Maxim ;
Cha, Ji Hwan ;
Levitin, Gregory .
IMA JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT MATHEMATICS, 2020, 31 (03) :345-365