Physiological responses of seven varieties of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] to salt stress

被引:2
|
作者
Khalid, Naila [1 ]
Saeed, Ahsan [1 ]
机构
[1] Bahauddin Zakariya Univ, Inst Bot, Multan 60000, Pakistan
来源
PLANT SCIENCE TODAY | 2023年 / 10卷 / 01期
关键词
Antioxidant activity; biological yield; chlorophyll; constituents; Glycinemax; salinity; ACID INDUCED CHANGES; OXIDATIVE STRESS; SALINITY TOLERANCE; LIPID-PEROXIDATION; GAS-EXCHANGE; AMINO-ACIDS; PROTEIN; PLANTS; CHLOROPHYLL; NUTRITION;
D O I
10.14719/pst.1986
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
In agriculture, salinity is one of the most significant abiotic stress that plants confront and harms agricultural productivity, physiological growth and de-velopment processes. In the present study, there were 7 different varieties of soybean (Ajmeri, William-82, D.A, PSC-60, Rawal-1, NARC-1 and NARC-2) were tested under NaCl concentration level (0 mM and 150 mM) to deter-mine their physiological performance under control and experimental con-ditions. The present investigation aimed to select salt tolerant varieties. Under salt stress, different varieties have differ significantly in the biological yield, chlorophyll contents, antioxidant activity and ionic concentrations. The results showed that among the seven varieties evaluated NARC-1 and NARC-2 were producing higher biological yield and antioxidant activity than others under 150 mM NaCl. NARC-1 and NARC-2 under 150 mM NaCl concen-tration produced significantly higher biomass in comparison with other va-rieties and similarly enhance the antioxidant activity by decreasing the cata-lase activity. The relative water content (RWC) of plants was measured 15, 30, 45 and 60 days after the treatment was applied, as well as at harvest time, along with the grain yield and characters related to yield. The 7 differ-ent soybean varieties tested showed significant differences in grain yield and yield-associated characters when exposed to salinity. The salinity had a greater impact on Ajmeri and William than on NARC-1 and NARC-2. Under salt stress, the grain yield of the NARC-1 and NARC-2 varieties was 70% and 65% respectively, while the yields of the Ajmeri and william-82 varieties were 41% and 38% respectively. The salinity-induced decrease in grain yield was traced to fewer pods per plant, fewer seeds per pod and a lighter weight per 100 grains. However, the number of pods per plant was most affected compared to the other characters. It was also observed that Na+ ion concentrations were elevated in the shoot under salt stress in all varieties. However, NARC-1 and NARC-2 showed low salt concentration in shoot as compared to other varieties. SDS-PAGE revealed significant variations in the protein profile of seedling soybean varieties. NARC-1 and NARC-2 have shown a unique banding pattern under salt stress with a molecular weight of 60 and 130 kDa. The results indicate that salinity (NaCl) triggered an antioxi-dant response in tolerant varieties (NARC-1 and NARC-2) of Glycine max (L.). This study suggested that both varieties have more capability and appropri-ate survival under salt stress as compared to other varieties.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 209
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Uranium effects on the growth of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.)
    Murthy, T.C.S.
    Weinberger, P.
    Measures, M.P.
    1600, (32):
  • [22] Androgenesis in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.): a critical revisit
    Ayyagari Ramlal
    Sahil Mehta
    Aparna Nautiyal
    Pooja Baweja
    Deepshikha Shivam
    S. K. Sharma
    Roshni Lal
    Dhandapani Vijayan
    Sreeramanan Raju
    Ambika Subramaniam
    In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant, 2024, 60 : 1 - 15
  • [23] The Impact of Planting Dates on the Performance of Soybean Varieties [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in the Nigerian Savannas
    Eseigbe, Osagie B.
    Kamara, Alpha Y.
    Miko, Sani
    Omoigui, Lucky O.
    Solomon, Reuben
    Adeleke, Musibau A.
    Tofa, Abdullahi I.
    Bebeley, Jenneh F.
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (10):
  • [24] Evaluation of yield and yield attributes traits of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) varieties in Uzbekistan
    Kholikova, Mokhichekhra
    Babakhanova, Dilnoza
    Rakhmatullayeva, Anora
    Khamrayev, Rustam
    Abdrashitova, Elena
    Xojamkulova, Yulduzoy
    Egamberdiev, Ramish
    Rejapova, Marguba
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE AND BIODIVERSITY, 2024, 8 (02) : 260 - 268
  • [25] Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) seed composition response to soil flooding stress
    VanToai, Tara T.
    Lee, Jeong-Dong
    Goulart, Patricia F. P.
    Shannon, J. Grover
    Alves, J. Donizeti
    Nguyen, Henry T.
    Yu, Oliver
    Rahman, Mohammed
    Islam, Rafiq
    JOURNAL OF FOOD AGRICULTURE & ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 10 (01): : 795 - 801
  • [26] Oxidative stress and photodamage at low temperatures in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) leaves
    Tambussi, EA
    Bartoli, CG
    Guiamet, JJ
    Beltrano, J
    Araus, JL
    PLANT SCIENCE, 2004, 167 (01) : 19 - 26
  • [27] Prolongation of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) nodule lifespan under drought stress
    Schluter, U.
    Mashamba, A.
    Kunert, K. J.
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2007, 73 (02) : 335 - 335
  • [28] Determination of clomazone and acetochlor residues in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.)
    Hussan, Husham N. M.
    He, Hairong
    Du, Pengqiang
    Wu, Xiaohu
    Liu, Xingang
    Xu, Jun
    Dong, Fengshou
    Zheng, Yongquan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2021, 101 (15) : 2503 - 2509
  • [29] Polygenic inheritance of canopy wilting in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]
    Charlson, Dirk V.
    Bhatnagar, Sandeep
    King, C. Andy
    Ray, Jeffery D.
    Sneller, Clay H.
    Carter, Thomas E., Jr.
    Purcell, Larry C.
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2009, 119 (04) : 587 - 594
  • [30] Development of Haploid Embryos from Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.)
    Sharma, Deepshikha
    Ramlal, Ayyagari
    Lal, Sanjay Kumar
    Raju, Dhandapani
    Saini, Manisha
    Talukdar, Akshay
    Mallikarjun, Bingi Pujari
    Subramaniam, Sreeramanan
    Rajendran, Ambika
    IN VITRO CELLULAR & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY-ANIMAL, 2024, 60 (01) : S155 - S155