A Bi-Objective Knowledge Transfer Framework for Evolutionary Many-Task Optimization

被引:42
作者
Jiang, Yi [1 ]
Zhan, Zhi-Hui [1 ]
Tan, Kay Chen [2 ]
Zhang, Jun [3 ]
机构
[1] South China Univ Technol, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Comp, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Hanyang Univ, Ansan 15588, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Bi-objective; evolutionary computation; evolutionary many-task optimization (EMaTO); evolutionary multitask optimization (EMTO); knowledge transfer; DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION; PARTICLE SWARM; MULTITASKING; ALGORITHM; COMPUTATION;
D O I
10.1109/TEVC.2022.3210783
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Many-task optimization problem (MaTOP) is a kind of challenging multitask optimization problem with more than three tasks. Two significant issues in solving MaTOPs are measuring intertask similarity and transferring knowledge among similar tasks. However, most existing algorithms only use a single similarity measurement, which cannot accurately measure the intertask similarity because the intertask similarity is a concept with multiple different aspects. To address this limitation, this article proposes a bi-objective knowledge transfer (BoKT) framework, which aims first to accurately measure different types of intertask similarity using two different measurements and second to effectively transfer knowledge with different types of similarity via specific strategies. To achieve the first goal, a bi-objective measurement is designed to measure intertask similarity from two different aspects, including shape similarity and domain similarity. To achieve the second goal, a similarity-based adaptive knowledge transfer strategy is designed to choose the suitable knowledge transfer strategy based on the type of intertask similarity. We compare the BoKT framework-based algorithms with several state-of-the-art algorithms on two challenging many-task optimization test suites with 16 instances and on real-world MaTOPs with up to 500 tasks. The experimental results show that the proposed algorithms generally outperform the compared algorithms.
引用
收藏
页码:1514 / 1528
页数:15
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Multifactorial Evolutionary Algorithm With Online Transfer Parameter Estimation: MFEA-II [J].
Bali, Kavitesh Kumar ;
Ong, Yew Soon ;
Gupta, Abhishek ;
Tan, Puay Siew .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2020, 24 (01) :69-83
[2]   Recent trends in the use of statistical tests for comparing swarm and evolutionary computing algorithms: Practical guidelines and a critical review [J].
Carrasco, J. ;
Garcia, S. ;
Rueda, M. M. ;
Das, S. ;
Herrera, F. .
SWARM AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2020, 54
[3]   An Adaptive Archive-Based Evolutionary Framework for Many-Task Optimization [J].
Chen, Yongliang ;
Zhong, Jinghui ;
Feng, Liang ;
Zhang, Jun .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EMERGING TOPICS IN COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 4 (03) :369-384
[4]   Evolutionary Computation for Intelligent Transportation in Smart Cities: A Survey [J].
Chen, Zong-Gan ;
Zhan, Zhi-Hui ;
Kwong, Sam ;
Zhang, Jun .
IEEE COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE MAGAZINE, 2022, 17 (02) :83-102
[5]   Coevolutionary multitasking for concurrent global optimization: With case studies in complex engineering design [J].
Cheng, Mei-Ying ;
Gupta, Abhishek ;
Ong, Yew-Soon ;
Ni, Zhi-Wei .
ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2017, 64 :13-24
[6]  
Da B, 2017, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:1706.03470, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1706.03470]
[7]  
Deb K., 1995, Complex Systems, V9, P115
[8]  
Deb K., 1996, COMPUTER SCI INFORMA, V26, P30, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-03423-127
[9]  
Deb K, 2007, GECCO 2007: GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, VOL 1 AND 2, P1187
[10]   Generalized Multitasking for Evolutionary Optimization of Expensive Problems [J].
Ding, Jinliang ;
Yang, Cuie ;
Jin, Yaochu ;
Chai, Tianyou .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2019, 23 (01) :44-58