Do Political Regimes Matter for Technology Diffusion?

被引:3
作者
Okada, Keisuke [1 ]
Samreth, Sovannroeun [2 ]
机构
[1] Kansai Univ, Fac Econ, 3-3-35 Yamate Cho, Suita, Osaka 5648680, Japan
[2] Saitama Univ, Grad Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Shimo-Okubo 255,Sakura Ku, Saitama, Saitama 3388570, Japan
关键词
Technology diffusion; Political regime; Democracy; Dictatorship; DEMOCRATIZATION; INNOVATION; HEALTH; HELIX;
D O I
10.1007/s13132-023-01266-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Productivity growth is important for long-term economic growth and development, and technology adoption is one of its key drivers. This study empirically assesses whether political regimes are a significant determinant of technology diffusion. Specifically, we examine the effects of political regimes on diffusion of technology using data based on a sample of 104 technologies from 137 countries for the period 1901 to 2000. We consider detailed categories of technologies and investigate the differences in the impacts of political regimes on each technology. Our estimation results show that democracy does not have a significant impact on the overall diffusion of technology but it is positively associated with the diffusion of health- and agriculture-related technologies. Furthermore, the diffusion of infrastructure, general, and other sector-specific technologies is not influenced by political regimes. Considering different types of democracies and dictatorships, we find that parliamentary democracy has a positive impact on health- and agriculture-related technology diffusion. On the contrary, all types of dictatorships, namely civilian, military, and royal, have negative impacts on diffusion of technology.
引用
收藏
页码:3409 / 3422
页数:14
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [11] Center for Systemic Peace, 2020, POLITY5 POL REG CHAR
  • [12] Trade liberalization, democratization, and technology adoption
    Cervellati, Matteo
    Naghavi, Alireza
    Toubal, Farid
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2018, 23 (02) : 145 - 173
  • [13] Democracy and dictatorship revisited
    Cheibub, Jose Antonio
    Gandhi, Jennifer
    Vreeland, James Raymond
    [J]. PUBLIC CHOICE, 2010, 143 (1-2) : 67 - 101
  • [14] Cross-country technology adoption: making the theories face the facts
    Comin, D
    Hobijn, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 2004, 51 (01) : 39 - 83
  • [15] Financial Development and Technology Diffusion
    Comin, Diego
    Nanda, Ramana
    [J]. IMF ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2019, 67 (02) : 395 - 419
  • [16] An Exploration of Technology Diffusion
    Comin, Diego
    Hobijn, Bart
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2010, 100 (05) : 2031 - 2059
  • [17] LOBBIES AND TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION
    Comin, Diego
    Hobijn, Bart
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2009, 91 (02) : 229 - 244
  • [18] Coppedge M., 2021, V DEM COUNTRY YEAR D, DOI [10.23696/vdemds21, DOI 10.23696/VDEMDS21]
  • [19] Dahl R. A., 1971, POLYARCHY PARTICIPAT
  • [20] The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations
    Etzkowitz, H
    Leydesdorff, L
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2000, 29 (02) : 109 - 123