Do Political Regimes Matter for Technology Diffusion?

被引:3
作者
Okada, Keisuke [1 ]
Samreth, Sovannroeun [2 ]
机构
[1] Kansai Univ, Fac Econ, 3-3-35 Yamate Cho, Suita, Osaka 5648680, Japan
[2] Saitama Univ, Grad Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Shimo-Okubo 255,Sakura Ku, Saitama, Saitama 3388570, Japan
关键词
Technology diffusion; Political regime; Democracy; Dictatorship; DEMOCRATIZATION; INNOVATION; HEALTH; HELIX;
D O I
10.1007/s13132-023-01266-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Productivity growth is important for long-term economic growth and development, and technology adoption is one of its key drivers. This study empirically assesses whether political regimes are a significant determinant of technology diffusion. Specifically, we examine the effects of political regimes on diffusion of technology using data based on a sample of 104 technologies from 137 countries for the period 1901 to 2000. We consider detailed categories of technologies and investigate the differences in the impacts of political regimes on each technology. Our estimation results show that democracy does not have a significant impact on the overall diffusion of technology but it is positively associated with the diffusion of health- and agriculture-related technologies. Furthermore, the diffusion of infrastructure, general, and other sector-specific technologies is not influenced by political regimes. Considering different types of democracies and dictatorships, we find that parliamentary democracy has a positive impact on health- and agriculture-related technology diffusion. On the contrary, all types of dictatorships, namely civilian, military, and royal, have negative impacts on diffusion of technology.
引用
收藏
页码:3409 / 3422
页数:14
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Distance to frontier, selection, and economic growth
    Acemoglu, D
    Aghion, P
    Zilibotti, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2006, 4 (01) : 37 - 74
  • [2] A MODEL OF GROWTH THROUGH CREATIVE DESTRUCTION
    AGHION, P
    HOWITT, P
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1992, 60 (02) : 323 - 351
  • [3] Benhabib J, 2005, HANDB ECON, V22, P935
  • [4] Health and democracy
    Besley, T
    Kudamatsu, M
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2006, 96 (02) : 313 - 318
  • [5] Campbell DFJ, 2019, Global Quality of Democracy as Innovation Enabler: Measuring democracy for success, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-72529-1
  • [6] Carayannis Elias G., 2010, International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, V1, P41, DOI 10.4018/jsesd.2010010105
  • [7] Carayannis E.G., 2014, Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, V3, P1, DOI DOI 10.1186/S13731-014-0012-2
  • [8] Helix Trilogy: the Triple, Quadruple, and Quintuple Innovation Helices from a Theory, Policy, and Practice Set of Perspectives
    Carayannis, Elias G.
    Campbell, David F. J.
    Grigoroudis, Evangelos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2022, 13 (03) : 2272 - 2301
  • [9] 'Mode 3' and 'Quadruple Helix': toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem
    Carayannis, Elias G.
    Campbell, David F. J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2009, 46 (3-4) : 201 - 234
  • [10] The end of the transition paradigm
    Carothers, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEMOCRACY, 2002, 13 (01): : 5 - 21