Comprehensive Environmental Assessment Index of Ecological Footprint

被引:8
作者
Khezri, Mohsen [1 ]
Mamghaderi, Mahnaz [2 ]
Razzaghi, Somayeh [3 ]
Heshmati, Almas [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kurdistan Hewler, Sch Management & Econ, Dept Business & Management, 30 Meter Ave, Erbil, Kurdistan Regio, Iraq
[2] Iran Univ Sci & Technol, Student Ind Engn, Tehran, Iran
[3] Bu Ali Sina Univ, Fac Econ & Social Sci, Hamadan, Hamadan, Iran
[4] Jonkoping Int Business Sch, Room B5017,Gjuterigatan 5, SE-55111 Jonkoping, Sweden
关键词
Environmental Performance; Ecological footprint; KPI; DEA; OECD Countries; RENEWABLE ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; CO2; EMISSIONS; TRADE OPENNESS; DEA APPROACH; EFFICIENCY; CHINA; INVESTMENT; IMPACTS; OUTPUTS;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-022-01747-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper aims to contribute to the growing body of research literature on assessing environmental efficiency by introducing a new key performance indicator (KPIs) in more complete and dependable aspects of ecological footprint indices. For this purpose, the DEA model considering three inputs (energy consumption, labor force, and capital stock), one desirable output (GDP), and different undesirable outputs (CO2 emissions, ecological footprint indicators) are applied to 27 OECD countries from 2000 to 2017. According to the results, Norway, Luxemburg, and United Kingdom are the most environmentally efficient countries in terms of environmental efficiency and ecological footprint efficiency. On the other hand, the lowest environmental and ecological footprint efficiencies were in countries like Lithuania, Slovak, Czech, Estonia, and the USA. In addition, these nations fare poorly regarding their carbon footprint and farmland efficiency. In further detail, Lithuania, South Korea, Portugal, and Spain have a critical status in fishing ground efficiency, while the forest area efficiency is very acute in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Czech.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 482
页数:18
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]   The likely adverse environmental impacts of renewable energy sources [J].
Abbasi, SA ;
Abbasi, N .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2000, 65 (1-4) :121-144
[2]   The dynamic impact of natural resources, technological innovations and economic growth on ecological footprint: An advanced panel data estimation [J].
Ahmad, Mahmood ;
Jiang, Ping ;
Majeed, Abdul ;
Umar, Muhammad ;
Khan, Zeeshan ;
Muhammad, Sulaman .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2020, 69
[3]   Moving towards a sustainable environment: The dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China [J].
Ahmed, Zahoor ;
Asghar, Muhammad Mansoor ;
Malik, Muhammad Nasir ;
Nawaz, Kishwar .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2020, 67
[4]   Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe [J].
Alola, Andrew Adewale ;
Bekun, Festus Victor ;
Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 685 :702-709
[5]  
Bani Yami MA., 2021, Malaysian J. Med. Health Sci., V17, P267
[6]   SOME MODELS FOR ESTIMATING TECHNICAL AND SCALE INEFFICIENCIES IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
BANKER, RD ;
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1984, 30 (09) :1078-1092
[7]   Fossil & renewable energy consumption, GHGs (greenhouse gases) and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of EU (European Union) countries [J].
Boluk, Gulden ;
Mert, Mehmet .
ENERGY, 2014, 74 :439-446
[8]   Environmental efficiency analysis of transportation system in China: A non-radial DEA approach [J].
Chang, Young-Tae ;
Zhang, Ning ;
Danao, Denise ;
Zhang, Nan .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 58 :277-283
[9]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[10]   Efficiency and abatement costs of energy-related CO2 emissions in China: A slacks-based efficiency measure [J].
Choi, Yongrok ;
Zhang, Ning ;
Zhou, P. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2012, 98 :198-208