Personality development in adolescence: Examining big five trait trajectories in differential learning environments

被引:10
作者
Tetzner, Julia [1 ,2 ]
Becker, Michael [2 ,3 ]
Bihler, Lilly-Marlen [3 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Rudower Chaussee 18, D-12489 Berlin, Germany
[2] Leibniz Inst Res & Informat Educ, Frankfurt, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
关键词
personality; context; differential learning environments; adolescence; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; MEAN-LEVEL; CAUSAL INFERENCE; SCHOOL TRACKING; LIFE-COURSE; POND; TRANSITION; IDENTITY; ABILITY; AGE;
D O I
10.1177/08902070221121178
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study addresses two questions: Do Big Five traits change from early to middle adolescence? How do developmental trajectories differ between educational environments (i.e., secondary school tracks)? We used a representative random sample from Germany, following 6th graders (T1, N = 1662; age: M = 11.68; SD = 0.63; female = 47.4%; from N = 87 primary schools) to the end of compulsory secondary education over three measurement points (i.e., assessing students in 6(th), 7(th), and 9(th) grade). Results of latent change modeling indicated overall increases in mean levels for all personality traits from early to middle adolescence. Regarding selection effects, the results indicated that more conscientious, agreeable, extraverted, open, and emotionally stable sixth graders were more likely to transit into an academic rather than a non-academic secondary school track. Moreover, the results showed that these initial differences in personality traits seemed to diminish between 6(th) and 9(th) grade for all personality traits. Additionally, controlling for selection effects, a contextual effect was discernible for conscientiousness. This study highlighted the potential role of differential learning environments for modifying changes in personality traits during adolescence.
引用
收藏
页码:744 / 764
页数:21
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]   Personality development from 12 to 18 years of age: Changes in mean levels and structure of traits [J].
Allik, J ;
Laidra, K ;
Realo, A ;
Pullmann, H .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2004, 18 (06) :445-462
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, New frontiers for self research
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, ERHEBUNG BIG 5 BASIE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1979, Fifteen thousand hours: Secondary schools and their effects on children
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1983, Principals of modern psychological measurement
[6]  
Arnett JJ, 2000, AM PSYCHOL, V55, P469
[7]   A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Grootendorst, Paul ;
Anderson, Geoffrey M. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (04) :734-753
[8]  
Baumert J., 2004, PISA 2003. Der Bildungsstand der Jugendlichen in Deutschland e Ergebnisse des zweiten internationalen Vergleichs. [PISA 2003. The educational level of adolescents in Germany e the second international comparison], P314, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11618-005-0156-8
[9]   Teachers' Mathematical Knowledge, Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress [J].
Baumert, Juergen ;
Kunter, Mareike ;
Blum, Werner ;
Brunner, Martin ;
Voss, Thamar ;
Jordan, Alexander ;
Klusmann, Uta ;
Krauss, Stefan ;
Neubrand, Michael ;
Tsai, Yi-Miau .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2010, 47 (01) :133-180
[10]  
Baumert Jurgen., 2006, Herkunftsbedingte Disparitaten im Bildungswesen: differenzielle Bildungsprozesse und Probleme der Verteilungsgerechtigkeit: Vertiefende Analysen im Rahmen von PISA 2000 S, DOI [10.1007/978-3-531-90082-74, DOI 10.1007/978-3-531-90082-7_4, DOI 10.1007/978-3-531-90082-7]