Comparing Estimated and Real Item Difficulty Using Multi-Facet Rasch Analysis *

被引:1
作者
Sayin, Ayfer [1 ]
Goren, Sebahat [2 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Fac Educ, Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Educ, Ankara, Turkiye
来源
JOURNAL OF MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION AND PSYCHOLOGY-EPOD | 2023年 / 14卷 / 04期
关键词
test development; item difficulty; subject matter experts; multi -facet Rasch; ANGOFF METHOD; STANDARD; TEACHERS; LANGUAGE;
D O I
10.21031/epod.1310893
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
This study aimed to compare estimated item difficulty based on expert opinion with real item difficulty based on data by utilizing Rasch analysis. For security reasons, some high-stakes tests are not pre-tested and item difficulty is estimated by teachers in classroom assessments, so it is necessary to examine the extent to which experts make accurate predictions. In this study, we developed a 12-item test in the field of measurement and evaluation similar to those used in the Public Personnel Selection Exam. Item difficulty was estimated and compared separately based on 1165 student responses and the opinions of 12 experts. A multi-facet Rasch analysis was conducted to examine the effects of raters on the test scores. The study revealed that the experts had a good ability to estimate item difficulty for items of moderate difficulty. However, they tended to underestimate item difficulty for items.
引用
收藏
页码:440 / 454
页数:15
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
AITSL A. I. f. T. a. S. L., 2022, AITSL, Australian Professional Standards for Teachers
[2]  
Attali Y., 2014, ETS Research Report Series, V2, P1, DOI 10.1002/ets2.12042
[3]  
Beinborn L., 2014, Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, V2, P517, DOI 10.1162/tacla00200
[4]   The Effect of Rating Unfamiliar Items on Angoff Passing Scores [J].
Clauser, Jerome C. ;
Hambleton, Ronald K. ;
Baldwin, Peter .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2017, 77 (06) :901-916
[5]  
Ell F., 2021, TEACHER ED POLICY RE, P113, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3775-99, DOI 10.1007/978-981-16-3775-9_9]
[6]  
Enright M.K., 1993, ETS Research Report Series, V1993, pi, DOI [10.1002/j.2333-8504.1993.tb01529.x, DOI 10.1002/J.2333-8504.1993.TB01529.X]
[7]   Predicting confrontation naming item difficulty [J].
Fergadiotis, Gerasimos ;
Swiderski, Alexander ;
Hula, William D. .
APHASIOLOGY, 2019, 33 (06) :689-709
[8]  
Gitomer D.H., 2010, RECENT TRENDS MEAN S
[9]   Teaching assistance and automatic difficulty estimation in converting first order logic to clause form [J].
Grivokostopoulou, Foteini ;
Hatzilygeroudis, Ioannis ;
Perikos, Isidoros .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2014, 42 (03) :347-367
[10]  
Hamamoto PT, 2020, SAO PAULO MED J, V138, P33, DOI [10.1590/1516-3180.2019.0459.R1.19112019, 10.1590/1516-3180.2019.0459.r1.19112019]