Correlation between classical Roman law and English common law: comparative historical analysis

被引:0
作者
Sharkova, Irina N. [1 ]
Mandragelia, Volodymyr A. [2 ]
Gaydulin, Oleksandr O. [3 ]
机构
[1] Kyiv Natl Econ Univ, Kiev, Ukraine
[2] Natl Acad Educ Sci Ukraine, Univ Educ Management, Continuous Profess Educ State Inst Higher Educ, Bila Tserkva Inst, Kiev, Ukraine
[3] Natl Acad Law Sci Ukraine, FH Burchak Sci Res Inst Private Law & Entrepreneur, Kiev, Ukraine
来源
JURIDICAL TRIBUNE-TRIBUNA JURIDICA | 2023年 / 13卷 / 04期
关键词
Ancient Roman law; English common law; legal history; comparative law; reception of law; CIVIL-LAW;
D O I
10.24818/TBJ/2023/13/4.04
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The term 'correlation' can be interpretated in a wider meaning than the presence of a frequency of connection between two collignial indicators. This semantic content as "a relation existing between phenomena" is present in the discourse of liberal arts, in contrast to parametric statistics. The purpose of the study is to verify the existence of a correlation between basic conceptual ideas in Ancient Roman law and English common law and to evaluate the scope and manifestations of this issue. The research problem is complicated by the fact that the overwhelming majority of modern historians traditionally contrast the legal systems of continental European countries with Anglo-American law. And there very few famous scientists who consistently reaffirm the opposite position and consider that the common legal tradition in Europe exists. The article shows three groups of key evidence of Ancient Roman Law influences on the English Common Law. The historical arguments explain the fantastic ability of English law to export to other countries. In world history, this property was only one legal culture, namely Old Roman. These abilities to transfer and reception are defined as the most significant parallels between the legal traditions that are investigated.
引用
收藏
页码:565 / 574
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1828, American Dictionary of the English Language
[2]   PROPORTIONALITY BALANCING AND GLOBA L GOVERNANCE: AC OMPA RATIVE AND GLOBA L APPROACH [J].
Bomhoff, Jacco .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW, 2021, 69 (01) :168-172
[3]   Choice of Law in the American Courts in 2021: Thirty-Fifth Annual Survey [J].
Coyle, John F. ;
Dodge, William S. ;
Simowitz, Aaron D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW, 2022, 70 (02) :318-363
[4]  
Crittenden A.R., 1919, The Classical Journal, V15, P148
[5]  
DAINOW J, 1967, AM J COMP LAW, V15, P419
[6]  
Donlan S.P., 2008, Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, V12, P1
[7]  
du Plessis Paul J., Edinburgh Studies in Law
[8]   Challenges in the Interdisciplinary Use of Comparative Law [J].
Engel, Christoph .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW, 2021, 69 (04) :777-797
[10]  
Gregory S. Alexander, 1976, Nw. U. L. Rev., V70, P602