Cellulosic ethanol production: Assessment of the impacts of learning and plant capacity

被引:5
作者
Aui, Alvina [1 ]
Wang, Yu [2 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Ames, IA 50010 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Ames, IA 50011 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Technological learning; Learning-by-doing; Experience curve; Cellulosic ethanol; Plant capacity; PRODUCTION COSTS; ENERGY; BIOFUELS; CURVE; SIZE; OPTIMIZATION; REDUCTIONS; DRIVERS; BIOMASS; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122923
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Cellulosic ethanol has great potential to displace fossil fuels and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but supply is low due to high cost. Learning-by-doing is a strategy to reduce cost with increases in capacity. This study at-tempts to understand how learning-by-doing affects the growth of cellulosic ethanol in synergy with plant ca-pacity. We modeled a three-phase learning effect using a hybrid general equilibrium model to project the U.S cellulosic ethanol production. The reference case projects an annual production of 5.49 million gallons (MG) from 2030 to 2040. With strong policy support of a high mandate, the U.S. is projected to produce 171 MG of cellulosic ethanol in 2040. However, the learning-by-doing effect cannot be initiated because only 4 large-scale centralized plants will be built. When plant size reduces, learning-by-doing is enabled, and 2040 cellulosic ethanol production can reach 3.27 billion gallons. Similar result is predicted for the cases representing an actual biorefinery. Fast and widespread learning is estimated to greatly increase production when plants have lower capital cost. The findings show that policy incentives are critical to technology development when cost is a significant barrier. Additionally, building small-size plants is a strategy that will enable and facilitate the learning-by-doing effect.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Outlook on biofuels in future studies: A systematic literature review [J].
Alizadeh, Reza ;
Lund, Peter D. ;
Soltanisehat, Leili .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2020, 134
[2]   Evaluating the economic feasibility of cellulosic ethanol: A meta-analysis of techno-economic analysis studies [J].
Aui, A. ;
Wang, Y. ;
Mba-Wright, M. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 145
[3]   LPost-RFS supports for cellulosic ethanol: Evaluation of economic and environmental impacts of alternative policies [J].
Aui, Alvina ;
Wang, Yu .
ENERGY POLICY, 2022, 170
[4]   Explaining the experience curve: Cost reductions of Brazilian ethanol from sugarcane [J].
Bake, J. D. van den Wall ;
Junginger, M. ;
Faaij, A. ;
Poot, T. ;
Walter, A. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2009, 33 (04) :644-658
[5]  
Brown A., 2020, The Role of Renewable Transport Fuels in Decarbonizing Road Transport: Production Technologies and Costs, P134
[6]  
Brown MarilynA. Yu Wang., 2015, GREEN SAVINGS POLICI
[7]   Environmental impacts of technology learning curve for cellulosic ethanol in Brazil [J].
Cavalett, Otavio ;
Chagas, Mateus F. ;
Junqueira, Tassia L. ;
Watanabe, Marcos D. B. ;
Bonomi, Antonio .
INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2017, 106 :31-39
[8]   The US cellulosic biofuels industry: Expert views on commercialization drivers and barriers [J].
Chen, Min ;
Smith, Paul M. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2017, 102 :52-61
[9]   Explaining the reductions in US corn ethanol processing costs: Testing competing hypotheses [J].
Chen, Xiaoguang ;
Khanna, Madhu .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 44 :153-159
[10]   A dynamic programming approach for modeling low-carbon fuel technology adoption considering learning-by-doing effect [J].
Chen, Yuche ;
Zhang, Yunteng ;
Fan, Yueyue ;
Hu, Kejia ;
Zhao, Jianyou .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 185 :825-835