Environmental regulation, green technology progress and haze reduction and carbon reduction

被引:4
作者
Zhang, Yunyun [1 ]
Cui, Xuemin [1 ]
Liu, Lina [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Normal Univ, Business Sch, Jinan 250358, Peoples R China
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
Environmental regulation; Haze and carbon reduction; Green technology progress; Panel threshold regression; INNOVATION; EMISSIONS; POLLUTION; COMPETITIVENESS; DYNAMICS; POLICY; US;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-023-29903-w
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Coordinated efforts to reduce haze and carbon emissions are important in promoting global climate governance and sustainable development. In this paper, based on prefecture-level data of China from 2005 to 2019, we investigate the impact of environmental regulatory intensity on the emissions of the concentration of PM2.5 and carbon dioxide (CO2). The research indicates that environmental regulation facilitates synergistic governance for PM2.5 reduction and carbon mitigation. Green technological advancement emerges as the primary mechanism through which environmental regulation achieves haze reduction and carbon mitigation. This conclusion remains robust after a series of robustness tests. Furthermore, the results from quantile regression reveal that the haze reduction and carbon mitigation effects of environmental regulation are subject to certain conditional dependencies. Environmental regulation exhibits a significant negative impact on carbon emissions across various quantile points. However, their influence on different quantile levels of PM2.5 concentration displays an asymmetric pattern. Finally, threshold regression findings suggest that there is no significant threshold effect of environmental regulation on CO2 emissions, but there are dual threshold effects on the PM2.5 concentration. Therefore, it is recommended that local governments judiciously implement environmental regulatory intensity, establish interregional policies for haze reduction and carbon mitigation, and fully harness the driving force of green technology to promote a comprehensive green transformation of economic and social development.
引用
收藏
页码:36367 / 36383
页数:17
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] The Environment and Directed Technical Change
    Acemoglu, Daron
    Aghion, Philippe
    Bursztyn, Leonardo
    Hemous, David
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (01) : 131 - 166
  • [2] Technological innovation, natural resources, financial inclusion, and environmental degradation in BRI economies
    Ali, Kishwar
    Jianguo, Du
    Kirikkaleli, Dervis
    Bacs, Zoltan
    Olah, Judit
    [J]. NATURAL RESOURCE MODELING, 2023, 36 (03)
  • [3] How do energy resources and financial development cause environmental sustainability?
    Ali, Kishwar
    Du, Jianguo
    Kirikkaleli, Dervis
    [J]. ENERGY REPORTS, 2023, 9 : 4036 - 4048
  • [4] Ambec I., 2006, Energy Studies Review, V14, P42, DOI [DOI 10.15173/ESR.V14I2.493, 10.15173/esr.v14i2.493]
  • [5] Defining the rebound effect
    Berkhout, PHG
    Muskens, JC
    Velthuijsen, JW
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (6-7) : 425 - 432
  • [6] Linking emission trading to environmental innovation: Evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry
    Borghesi, Simone
    Cainelli, Giulio
    Mazzanti, Massimiliano
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2015, 44 (03) : 669 - 683
  • [7] The emission reduction effect of daily penalty policy on firms
    Bu, Caiqi
    Shi, Daqian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 294
  • [8] Environmental Regulation Cost and Industry Structure Changes
    Burton, Diana M.
    Gomez, Irma A.
    Love, H. Alan
    [J]. LAND ECONOMICS, 2011, 87 (03) : 545 - 557
  • [9] Green inventions and greenhouse gas emission dynamics: a close examination of provincial Italian data
    Weina D.
    Gilli M.
    Mazzanti M.
    Nicolli F.
    [J]. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 2016, 18 (2) : 247 - 263
  • [10] The validity of carbon emission trading policies: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Dong Zhi-Qing
    Wang Hui
    Wang Shi-Xiang
    Wang Lin-Hui
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CLIMATE CHANGE RESEARCH, 2020, 11 (02) : 102 - 109