Comparison of hemodynamic indices of dialysis patients in continuous renal replacement therapy and intermittent renal replacement therapy methods with ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in intensive care unit

被引:1
作者
Najafi, Atabak [1 ]
Ardabili, Ayda Vakili [2 ]
Aghsaeifard, Ziba [3 ]
Sharifnia, Hamidreza [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, Sina Hosp, Tehran, Iran
[2] Ardabil Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, Ardebil, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sina Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Nephrol, Tehran, Iran
来源
JOURNAL OF RENAL INJURY PREVENTION | 2023年 / 12卷 / 02期
关键词
Hemodynamic indexes; Continuous renal replacement therapy; Renal replacement therapy; Acute kidney injury; Dialysis; EXTENDED DAILY DIALYSIS; ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY; FAILURE; TRIAL;
D O I
10.34172/jrip.2023.32114
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in the intensive care unit (ICU) and is independently associated with end-stage renal disease and higher mortality in the ICU. There are different methods to supporting kidney function in critically ill patients. The renal replacement therapy (RRT) can be conducted continuously, intermittently, or in combination. Objectives: The purpose of our study is to investigate the hemodynamic indices of dialysis patients in the ICU by two methods high flow continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and intermittently renal replacement therapy (IRRT) of ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM). Patients and Methods: In this study conducted at Sina hospital, patients requiring dialysis hospitalized to the ICU were studied. Around 48 patients benefited from rapid CRRT or IRRT in the opinion of a specialist. Basic patient information was recorded. To check hemodynamic parameters during dialysis, USCOM was carried out to check corrected flow time value (FTc) parameters, systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and cardiac output. Results were compared between the IRRT and CRRT groups. Results: This study was conducted on 48 patients who were candidates for dialysis. Patients were divided into high flow CRRT and IRRT groups based on clinical indications. In CRRT group, 19 patients (79.2%) and in the IRRT group, 20 patients (83.3%) were male (P=0.712). Their mean age was 68.70 +/- 8.25 years in the CRRT group and 68.58 +/- 7.19 years in the IRRT group. All patients had cardiac output monitored using USCOM or ultrasound. The mean Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in the CRRT group was 7 and in the IRRT group was 6, with no significant difference among them. FTc value variable or modified flow time in the carotid artery, cardiac output, cardiac index, SVR variable and mean arterial pressure in in the two groups at four evaluated times ( before dialysis, 15 minutes later, one hour later and end of dialysis) from the study the difference were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Although previos studies have recommended CRRT, our study showed significant difference may not be existed between IRRT and CRRT.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Alvarez G, 2019, CAN J ANESTH, V66, P593, DOI 10.1007/s12630-019-01306-x
  • [2] A randomized controlled trial comparing intermittent with continuous dialysis in patients with ARF
    Augustine, JJ
    Sandy, D
    Seifert, TH
    Paganini, EP
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2004, 44 (06) : 1000 - 1007
  • [3] A pilot randomised controlled comparison of continuous veno-venous haemofiltration and extended daily dialysis with filtration: effect on small solutes and acid-base balance
    Baldwin, Ian
    Naka, Toshio
    Koch, Bill
    Fealy, Nigel
    Bellomo, Rinaldo
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2007, 33 (05) : 830 - 835
  • [4] Evaluation of Acute Kidney Injury and Mortality After Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage
    Burgess, L. Goodwin
    Goyal, Nitin
    Jones, G. Morgan
    Khorchid, Yasser
    Kerro, Ali
    Chapple, Kristina
    Tsivgoulis, Georgios
    Alexandrov, Andrei V.
    Chang, Jason J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2018, 7 (08):
  • [5] Continuous vs. intermittent hemodialysis: With which spin will my patient win?
    Chater, Kamal
    Kellum, John A.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2007, 11 (05):
  • [6] Dai Tian, 2016, Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue, V28, P277
  • [7] Single-best Choice Between Intermittent Versus Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Review
    Fathima, Nida
    Kashif, Tooba
    Janapala, Rajesh N.
    Jayaraj, Joseph S.
    Qaseem, Aisha
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [8] A European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) position statement on the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guidelines on Acute Kidney Injury: Part 1: definitions, conservative management and contrast-induced nephropathy
    Fliser, Danilo
    Laville, Maurice
    Covic, Adrian
    Fouque, Denis
    Vanholder, Raymond
    Juillard, Laurent
    Van Biesen, Wim
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 27 (12) : 4263 - 4272
  • [9] Extended daily dialysis vs. continuous hemodialysis for ICU patients with acute renal failure: A two-year single center report
    Kumar, VA
    Yeun, JY
    Depner, TA
    Don, BR
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2004, 27 (05) : 371 - 379
  • [10] High-dose versus low-dose haemofiltration for the treatment of critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Peng
    Qu, Li-ping
    Qi, Dong
    Shen, Bo
    Wang, Yi-mei
    Xu, Jia-rui
    Jiang, Wu-hua
    Zhang, Hao
    Ding, Xiao-qiang
    Teng, Jie
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (10):