Study on an architecture of ontology-based task modeling and deduction for automotive troubleshooting service

被引:0
作者
Liang, Jeremy S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Polytech, Room 413,SiXing Bldg,Gaoke Rd, Wenzhou 325035, Peoples R China
关键词
Automotive troubleshooting procedure; ontology; knowledge engineering; deduction; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; FAULT-DIAGNOSIS; PRODUCT; DESIGN; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1177/09544070221121884
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The rapid development of today's smart automobile with increasing functionality and complexity, which results in rising requirement and cost for its troubleshooting service in the after-sales stage. Hence, to keep the firm's competitive strength, effective design knowledge utilization of automotive created from the task model can promote the feasibility making of a troubleshooting procedure by offering available relationships and semantic scheme of task. The proposed architecture primarily consists of base, field and application three tiers. A formalized representation of ontology, OWL, is used to organize the base filed. The filed tier includes extensional notions and relations for integration of troubleshooting and a criterion repository for verifying solution feasibility, which is depicted in SWRL. In the application tier, a deducing module is generated on the basis of ontology and criterion deduction. To enhance this semantics, in this research, a task modeling and deduction mechanism with feature-intensive ontology are proposed to clearly represent correlative notions for automotive troubleshooting planning (ATP). A criterion-based deducing module on the basis of OWL-DL and SWRL is also applied to specify implied relations through merging deducing modules (DMs) to deal with complex feature data. Eventually, this proposed architecture is examined and verified with an instance relevant to automotive troubleshooting procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 127
页数:18
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] Adusei C., 2019, Open Access Libr. J, V6, pe5167, DOI [10.4236/oalib.1105167, DOI 10.4236/OALIB.1105167]
  • [2] Assouroko Ibrahim, 2014, International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management, V7, P54, DOI 10.1504/IJPLM.2014.065460
  • [3] Ontology based action planning and verification for agile manufacturing
    Balakirsky, Stephen
    [J]. ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER-INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2015, 33 : 21 - 28
  • [4] Reference model for the implementation of new assembly processes in the automotive sector
    Baraldi, Emilio C.
    Kaminski, Paulo Carlos
    [J]. COGENT ENGINEERING, 2018, 5 (01):
  • [5] Design for manufacturing and assembly/disassembly: joint design of products and production systems
    Battaia, Olga
    Dolgui, Alexandre
    Heragu, Sunderesh S.
    Meerkov, Semyon M.
    Tiwari, Manoj Kumar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2018, 56 (24) : 7181 - 7189
  • [6] Breitsprecher T, 2014, PROC INT DESIGN CONF, P1723
  • [7] CarTrade, 2011, BRAK SYST CARS
  • [8] The evolution, challenges, and future of knowledge representation in product design systems
    Chandrasegaran, Senthil K.
    Ramani, Karthik
    Sriram, Ram D.
    Horvath, Imre
    Bernard, Alain
    Harik, Ramy F.
    Gao, Wei
    [J]. COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN, 2013, 45 (02) : 204 - 228
  • [9] Ontology and CBR based automated decision-making method for the disassembly of mechanical products
    Chen, Shaoli
    Yi, Jianjun
    Jiang, Hui
    Zhu, Xiaomin
    [J]. ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2016, 30 (03) : 564 - 584
  • [10] Smart Monitoring of Manufacturing Systems for Automated Decision-Making: A Multi-Method Framework
    Cheng, Chen-Yang
    Pourhejazy, Pourya
    Hung, Chia-Yu
    Yuangyai, Chumpol
    [J]. SENSORS, 2021, 21 (20)