Radiographic Robustness of Lumbar Interbody Fusion Techniques

被引:2
|
作者
Bouchard, Alice [1 ]
Mun, Jeffrey [1 ]
Vazquez, Frank [1 ]
Tang, Alex [2 ]
Delsole, Edward [3 ]
Strom, Russell [4 ]
Chen, Tan [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Geisinger Commonwealth Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Scranton, PA USA
[2] Northeast Orthopaed Surg Residency, Geisinger, Wilkes Barren, PA USA
[3] Geisinger Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Danville, PA USA
[4] Geisinger Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Danville, PA USA
[5] Geisinger Commonwealth Sch Med, Div Orthopaed Spine Surg, Orthopaed Surg, 525 Pine St, Scranton, PA 18510 USA
关键词
spinal fusion; lumbar interbody fusion; degenerative disc disease; x-rays; lumbar; OUTCOMES; TLIF; PLIF; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; DISEASE; ALIF;
D O I
10.1177/21925682241226659
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Retrospective chart review.Objectives: Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) can be achieved with various techniques. Evidence supporting the long-term clinical advantages of one technique over another are inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to (1) determine the changes in sagittal parameters in the preoperative, intraoperative, and post-operative phase, (2) evaluate the radiographic maintenance of these parameters over time, and (3) compare the demographics and patient reported outcomes of patients undergoing various LIF techniques.Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with degenerative spine disease undergoing single level anterior (ALIF), lateral (LLIF), posterior (PLIF), or transforaminal (TLIF) lumbar interbody fusion. Data collected included patient demographics and diagnosis at time of surgery. Upright lumbar radiographs taken pre-operatively, intra-operatively, and post-operatively were measured for lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL), posterior disc height (PDH), and foraminal height (FH).Results: 194 patients in a single center were included. PDH and FH increased intra-operatively following ALIF (P < .0001), PLIF (P < .0001), LLIF (P < .0001), and TLIF (P < .0001). SL also increased intra-operatively for ALIF (P = .002) and LLIF (P = .0007). Compared to intra-operative radiographs, PDH and FH decreased at latest post-operative phase for ALIF (P < .03), LLIF (P < .003), TLIF (P < .001), and PLIF (P < .005). SL decreased for ALIF (P = .0008), and TLIF (P = .02). LL did not change postoperatively across techniques. Patient reported outcomes improved post-surgically and disability index decreased, but neither differed between techniques.Conclusion: LIF, regardless of technique, was shown to provide significant radiographic changes in PDH and FH. Techniques utilizing larger intervertebral cage sizes (ALIF/LLIF) improved SL. Single level LIF did not affect overall LL. No single technique displayed superior radiographic robustness over time.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 65
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intervertebral Micro Access Surgery for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Ray, Wilson Z.
    Dorward, Ian G.
    Masson, Robert L.
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 12 (03) : 203 - 213
  • [32] Endoscopic Techniques for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Principles and Context
    Zheng, Bryan
    Shaaya, Elias
    Feler, Josh
    Leary, Owen P.
    Hagan, Matthew J.
    Bajaj, Ankush
    Fridley, Jared S.
    Hassel, Frank
    Gardocki, Raymond
    Grau, Ricardo Casal
    Lewandrowski, Kai-Uwe
    Telfeian, Albert E.
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 2022
  • [33] Posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Oliver, MD
    Cahill, DW
    Hajjar, MV
    TECHNIQUES IN NEUROSURGERY, 2001, 7 (02): : 127 - 139
  • [34] Evaluation of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Performed
    Guyer, Richard D.
    Zigler, Jack E.
    Blumenthal, Scott L.
    Shellock, Jessica L.
    Ohnmeiss, Donna D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2023, 17 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [35] Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disease
    Li, Hui-Min
    Zhang, Ren-Jie
    Shen, Cai-Liang
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 122 : E627 - E638
  • [36] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion - Clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients
    Potter, BK
    Freedman, BA
    Verwiebe, EG
    Hall, JM
    Polly, DW
    Kuklo, TR
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2005, 18 (04): : 337 - 346
  • [37] Comparison of clinical and radiological results of posterolateral fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion techniques in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine
    Audat, Z.
    Moutasem, O.
    Yousef, K.
    Mohammad, B.
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 53 (03) : 183 - 187
  • [38] Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Multilevel Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Adult Degenerative Scoliosis
    Katz, Austen D.
    Singh, Hardeep
    Greenwood, Matthew
    Cote, Mark
    Moss, Isaac L.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (08): : E386 - E396
  • [39] The effect of a radiographic solid fusion on clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Park, Yung
    Ha, Joong Won
    Lee, Yun Tae
    Sung, Na Young
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 11 (03) : 205 - 212
  • [40] Biomechanical evaluation of Percutaneous endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical analysis
    Li, Jia-Rui
    Yan, Yang
    Wu, Xiao-Gang
    He, Li-Ming
    Feng, Hao-Yu
    COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 27 (03) : 285 - 295