Radiographic Robustness of Lumbar Interbody Fusion Techniques

被引:2
|
作者
Bouchard, Alice [1 ]
Mun, Jeffrey [1 ]
Vazquez, Frank [1 ]
Tang, Alex [2 ]
Delsole, Edward [3 ]
Strom, Russell [4 ]
Chen, Tan [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Geisinger Commonwealth Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Scranton, PA USA
[2] Northeast Orthopaed Surg Residency, Geisinger, Wilkes Barren, PA USA
[3] Geisinger Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Danville, PA USA
[4] Geisinger Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Danville, PA USA
[5] Geisinger Commonwealth Sch Med, Div Orthopaed Spine Surg, Orthopaed Surg, 525 Pine St, Scranton, PA 18510 USA
关键词
spinal fusion; lumbar interbody fusion; degenerative disc disease; x-rays; lumbar; OUTCOMES; TLIF; PLIF; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; DISEASE; ALIF;
D O I
10.1177/21925682241226659
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Retrospective chart review.Objectives: Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) can be achieved with various techniques. Evidence supporting the long-term clinical advantages of one technique over another are inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to (1) determine the changes in sagittal parameters in the preoperative, intraoperative, and post-operative phase, (2) evaluate the radiographic maintenance of these parameters over time, and (3) compare the demographics and patient reported outcomes of patients undergoing various LIF techniques.Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with degenerative spine disease undergoing single level anterior (ALIF), lateral (LLIF), posterior (PLIF), or transforaminal (TLIF) lumbar interbody fusion. Data collected included patient demographics and diagnosis at time of surgery. Upright lumbar radiographs taken pre-operatively, intra-operatively, and post-operatively were measured for lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL), posterior disc height (PDH), and foraminal height (FH).Results: 194 patients in a single center were included. PDH and FH increased intra-operatively following ALIF (P < .0001), PLIF (P < .0001), LLIF (P < .0001), and TLIF (P < .0001). SL also increased intra-operatively for ALIF (P = .002) and LLIF (P = .0007). Compared to intra-operative radiographs, PDH and FH decreased at latest post-operative phase for ALIF (P < .03), LLIF (P < .003), TLIF (P < .001), and PLIF (P < .005). SL decreased for ALIF (P = .0008), and TLIF (P = .02). LL did not change postoperatively across techniques. Patient reported outcomes improved post-surgically and disability index decreased, but neither differed between techniques.Conclusion: LIF, regardless of technique, was shown to provide significant radiographic changes in PDH and FH. Techniques utilizing larger intervertebral cage sizes (ALIF/LLIF) improved SL. Single level LIF did not affect overall LL. No single technique displayed superior radiographic robustness over time.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 65
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Utilization and Economic Impact of Posterolateral Fusion and Posterior/Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgeries in the United States
    Saifi, Comron
    Cazzulino, Alejandro
    Laratta, Joseph
    Save, Akshay, V
    Shillingford, Jamal N.
    Louie, Philip K.
    Pugely, Andrew J.
    Arlet, Vincent
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 9 (02) : 185 - 190
  • [22] Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Which One in Which Patient?
    Dada, Abraham
    Liles, Campbell
    Kanter, Adam S.
    Alan, Nima
    NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2025, 36 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [23] A systematic review of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF)
    Rathbone, John
    Rackham, Matthew
    Nielsen, David
    Lee, So Mang
    Hing, Wayne
    Riar, Sukhman
    Scott-Young, Matthew
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 32 (06) : 1911 - 1926
  • [24] Effects of Different Orientations of Cage Implantation on Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Liang, Yan
    Zhao, Yongfei
    Xu, Shuai
    Zhu, Zhenqi
    Liu, Haiying
    Mao, Keya
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 140 : E97 - E104
  • [25] Comparison of low back fusion techniques: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approaches
    Cole C.D.
    McCall T.D.
    Schmidt M.H.
    Dailey A.T.
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2009, 2 (2) : 118 - 126
  • [26] Time Course Observation of Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Lin, Guang-Xun
    Park, Chun-Kun
    Hur, Jung-Woo
    Kim, Jin-Sung
    NEUROLOGIA MEDICO-CHIRURGICA, 2019, 59 (06) : 222 - 230
  • [27] Correction of Spondylolisthesis by Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L4-5
    Ko, Myeong Jin
    Park, Seung Won
    Kim, Young Baeg
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 62 (04) : 422 - 431
  • [28] Outcomes of extended transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spondylosis
    Talia, Adrian J.
    Wong, Michael L.
    Lau, Hui C.
    Kaye, Andrew H.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 22 (11) : 1762 - 1770
  • [29] Reduction of spondylolisthesis and restoration of lumbar lordosis after anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF)
    Aspalter, Stefan
    Stefanits, Harald
    Maier, Christoph Johannes
    Radl, Christian
    Wagner, Helga
    Hermann, Philipp
    Aichholzer, Martin
    Stroh, Nico
    Gruber, Andreas
    Senker, Wolfgang
    BMC SURGERY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [30] A Comparison of Radiographic Alignment between Bilateral and Unilateral Interbody Cages in Patients Undergoing Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Lambrechts, Mark James
    Heard, Jeremy
    D'Antonio, Nicholas
    Bodnar, John
    Schneider, Gregory
    Bloom, Evan
    Canseco, Jose
    Woods, Barrett
    Kaye, Ian David
    Kurd, Mark
    Rihn, Jeffrey
    Hilibrand, Alan
    Schroeder, Gregory
    Vaccaro, Alexander
    Kepler, Christopher
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 17 (04) : 666 - 675