Radiographic Robustness of Lumbar Interbody Fusion Techniques

被引:2
|
作者
Bouchard, Alice [1 ]
Mun, Jeffrey [1 ]
Vazquez, Frank [1 ]
Tang, Alex [2 ]
Delsole, Edward [3 ]
Strom, Russell [4 ]
Chen, Tan [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Geisinger Commonwealth Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Scranton, PA USA
[2] Northeast Orthopaed Surg Residency, Geisinger, Wilkes Barren, PA USA
[3] Geisinger Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Danville, PA USA
[4] Geisinger Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Danville, PA USA
[5] Geisinger Commonwealth Sch Med, Div Orthopaed Spine Surg, Orthopaed Surg, 525 Pine St, Scranton, PA 18510 USA
关键词
spinal fusion; lumbar interbody fusion; degenerative disc disease; x-rays; lumbar; OUTCOMES; TLIF; PLIF; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; DISEASE; ALIF;
D O I
10.1177/21925682241226659
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Retrospective chart review.Objectives: Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) can be achieved with various techniques. Evidence supporting the long-term clinical advantages of one technique over another are inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to (1) determine the changes in sagittal parameters in the preoperative, intraoperative, and post-operative phase, (2) evaluate the radiographic maintenance of these parameters over time, and (3) compare the demographics and patient reported outcomes of patients undergoing various LIF techniques.Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with degenerative spine disease undergoing single level anterior (ALIF), lateral (LLIF), posterior (PLIF), or transforaminal (TLIF) lumbar interbody fusion. Data collected included patient demographics and diagnosis at time of surgery. Upright lumbar radiographs taken pre-operatively, intra-operatively, and post-operatively were measured for lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL), posterior disc height (PDH), and foraminal height (FH).Results: 194 patients in a single center were included. PDH and FH increased intra-operatively following ALIF (P < .0001), PLIF (P < .0001), LLIF (P < .0001), and TLIF (P < .0001). SL also increased intra-operatively for ALIF (P = .002) and LLIF (P = .0007). Compared to intra-operative radiographs, PDH and FH decreased at latest post-operative phase for ALIF (P < .03), LLIF (P < .003), TLIF (P < .001), and PLIF (P < .005). SL decreased for ALIF (P = .0008), and TLIF (P = .02). LL did not change postoperatively across techniques. Patient reported outcomes improved post-surgically and disability index decreased, but neither differed between techniques.Conclusion: LIF, regardless of technique, was shown to provide significant radiographic changes in PDH and FH. Techniques utilizing larger intervertebral cage sizes (ALIF/LLIF) improved SL. Single level LIF did not affect overall LL. No single technique displayed superior radiographic robustness over time.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 65
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A biomechanical investigation of lumbar interbody fusion techniques
    Umale, Sagar
    Yoganandan, Narayan
    Baisden, Jamie L.
    Choi, Hoon
    Kurpad, Shekar N.
    JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2022, 125
  • [2] RADIOGRAPHIC RESTORATION OF LUMBAR ALIGNMENT AFTER TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION
    Jagannathan, Jay
    Sansur, Charles A.
    Oskouian, Rod J., Jr.
    Fu, Kai-Ming
    Shaffrey, Christopher I.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2009, 64 (05) : 955 - 963
  • [3] Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Techniques, Pearls and Pitfalls
    Kim, Young-Hoon
    Ha, Kee-Yong
    Rhyu, Kee-Won
    Park, Hyung-Youl
    Cho, Chang-Hee
    Kim, Hun-Chul
    Lee, Hyo-Jin
    Kim, Sang-Il
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 14 (05) : 730 - 741
  • [4] Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Anterior Plate Fixation
    Razzouk, Jacob
    Cheng, Daniel
    Carter, Davis
    Mehta, Shaurya
    Ramos, Omar
    Cheng, Wayne
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [5] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    de Kunder, Suzanne L.
    van Kuijk, Sander M. J.
    Rijkers, Kim
    Caelers, Inge J. M. H.
    van Hemert, Wouter L. W.
    de Bie, Rob A.
    van Santbrink, Henk
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 17 (11) : 1712 - 1721
  • [6] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Hoffmann, Christoph-Heinrich
    Kandziora, Frank
    OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2020, 32 (03): : 180 - 191
  • [7] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Review of Techniques and Outcomes
    Karikari, Isaac O.
    Isaacs, Robert E.
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (26) : S294 - S301
  • [8] Minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Kulkarni, Arvind G.
    Bohra, Hussain
    Dhruv, Abhilash
    Sarraf, Abhishek
    Bassi, Anupreet
    Patil, Vishwanath M.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2016, 50 (05) : 464 - 472
  • [9] Single-Level Anterolateral and Posterior Interbody Fusion Techniques are Associated With Equivalent Long-Term Lumbar Reoperations
    Narendran, Nakul
    Nilssen, Paal K.
    Skaggs, David L.
    Kim, Sang D.
    Perry, Tiffany G.
    Mikhail, Christopher M.
    Tuchman, Alexander
    SPINE, 2024, 49 (17) : 1241 - 1247
  • [10] Anterior Versus Posterior and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis: A Comparison of Radiographic, Clinical, and Patient Reported Outcomes
    Lavu, Monish S.
    Halkiadakis, Penelope N.
    Meade, Seth M.
    Makineni, Pratheek S.
    Shost, Michael D.
    Thompson, Nicolas R.
    White, Alexandra J.
    Golubovsky, Joshua L.
    Mroz, Thomas E.
    Steinmetz, Michael P.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2025,