Evaluation of User Experience in Human-Robot Interaction: A Systematic Literature Review

被引:29
作者
Apraiz, Ainhoa [1 ]
Lasa, Ganix [1 ]
Mazmela, Maitane [1 ]
机构
[1] Mondragon Unibertsitatea, Fac Engn Mech & Ind Prod, Loramendi 4, Arrasate Mondragon 20500, Guipuzcoa, Spain
关键词
Human-robot collaboration (HRC); Human-robot interaction (HRI); User experience (UX); Systematic literature review (SLR); Human factors; PHYSICAL WORKLOAD; DESIGN; USABILITY; EXPOSURE; REALITY; WORKING; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1007/s12369-022-00957-z
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Industry 4.0 has ushered in a new era of process automation, thus redefining the role of people and altering existing workplaces into unknown formats. The number of robots in the manufacturing industry has been steadily increasing for several decades and in recent years the number and variety of industries using robots have also increased. For robots to become allies in the day-to-day lives of operators, they need to provide positive and fit-for-purpose experiences through smooth and satisfying interactions. In this sense, user experience (UX) serves as the greatest link between persons and robots. Essential to the study of UX is its evaluation. Therefore, the aim of this study is to identify methodologies that evaluate the human-robot interaction (HRI) from a human-centred approach. A systematic literature review has been carried out, in which 24 articles have been identified. Among these, are 15 experimental studies, in addition to theoretical frameworks and tools. The review has provided insight into how evaluations are conducted in HRI. The results show the most evaluated factors and how they are measured considering different types of measurements: qualitative and quantitative, objective and subjective. Research gaps and future directions are correspondingly identified.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 210
页数:24
相关论文
共 114 条
[1]   Interface Transparency Issues in Teleoperation [J].
Almeida, Luis ;
Menezes, Paulo ;
Dias, Jorge .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (18)
[2]   Architectural paradigms for robotics applications [J].
Amoretti, Michele ;
Reggiani, Monica .
ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2010, 24 (01) :4-13
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, HDB HUMAN FACTORS ER
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, 9241 210 2010 ERGONO
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, ISO 8373
[6]  
Apraiz Iriarte A, 2021, DYNA NEW TECHNOL, DOI 10.6036/NT10072
[7]  
Apraiz Iriarte A, 2020, DYNA NEW TECHNOL, DOI 10.6036/nt9845
[8]   Digital human models in human factors and ergonomics evaluation of gesture interfaces [J].
Aromaa S. ;
Frangakis N. ;
Tedone D. ;
Viitaniemi J. ;
Aaltonen I. .
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2018, 2 (EICS)
[9]  
Bala S, 2022, GENDER PERSPECTIVES, P149
[10]   Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots [J].
Bartneck, Christoph ;
Kulic, Dana ;
Croft, Elizabeth ;
Zoghbi, Susana .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS, 2009, 1 (01) :71-81