Quantifying cathode biofilm resistance in a cdrAB modified Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

A range of biotechnological applications for converting electricity to fixed metabolic substrates is fuelling the study of cathodic bioelectrochemical systems. Shewanella oneidensis MR -1 has emerged as an important model system for extracellular electron uptake on cathodes, as many of the proteins involved in this process overlap with the organism's previously characterized extracellular electron transport machinery. However, there are still many questions surrounding the mechanics of electron uptake in Shewanella stemming largely from the challenge of quantifying biomass on electrode surfaces. This limits our understanding of the physiologic and kinetic constraints of electron uptake, as well as our ability to make meaningful comparisons across systems. To investigate the relationship between cathodic activity and biomass, we used a Shewanella oneidensis strain genetically modified with cell aggregation protein CdrAB behind a blue light -controlled promotor. Using blue light exposure to control cell deposition, we then investigated the relationship between cathodic activity and biomass. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) confirmed a decrease in biofilm impedance over a range of blue light exposures (i.e., 2 to 8 h). Consistent with previous results, after this timepoint, a drop -in electrochemical activity was observed, and impedances increased. For biofilms within the 2-8 h light exposure range, we observed a trend towards increased biological current consumption by quantifying the difference between pre and post kill currents. Comparing EIS data between pre and post kill experiments supported an increase in impedance post addition of killing agents and a trend towards the lowest biofilm impedances observed in the longest blue light exposed systems. Using an equivalent circuit model to extrapolate specific biofilm parameters we quantified the charger transfer resistance within the biofilm that corresponds to varying biofilm thicknesses and matches previously observed activities. For example, electrochemical activity was highest for the 8 h blue light exposed biofilm condition, with a maximum cathodic biologic current of -5.49 +/- 0.85 mu A, and a biofilm charge transfer resistance measured at 6909.5 +/- 2136.5 ohm. On an individual reactor basis, we correlate this biofilm charge transfer resistance with biologic cathodic current. We observed a linear trend with a correlation score of 0.87 (r2 = 0.773). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first investigation of biofilm physiology on Shewanella cathodes using EIS. Continued efforts in this direction will further our understanding of biofilmelectrode interface during extracellular electron uptake with the goal of enhancing applications to bioelectrochemical systems.