Use of cell-free non-invasive prenatal testing in pregnancies affected by placental mosaicism

被引:5
|
作者
Lund, Ida Charlotte Bay [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Becher, Naja [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lildballe, Dorte [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Andreasen, Lotte [1 ]
Thomsen, Simon Horsholt [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Vestergaard, Else Marie [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Vogel, Ida [1 ,2 ,4 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Genet, Brendstrupgaardsvej 21C, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ, Ctr Fetal Diagnost, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ, Dept Biomed, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Aarhus Univ, Dept Clin Med, Aarhus, Denmark
[5] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Mol Med, Aarhus, Denmark
[6] Horsens Reg Hosp, Dept Clin Biochem, Horsens, Denmark
[7] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
FETOPLACENTAL MOSAICISM;
D O I
10.1002/pd.6558
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate cell-free non-invasive prenatal testing (cfNIPT) in pregnancies affected by mosaicism. Method: We assessed paired cfNIPT and chorionic villus sample (CVS) results from the same pregnancies in a case series of mosaicism detected in Central and North Denmark Regions from April 2014 to September 2018. Indications for the clinically obtained CVS, pregnancy markers and outcome were retrieved from The Danish Fetal Medicine Database. Results: Mosaicisms in CVS involved common aneuploidy, n = 14; sex chromosomal aneuploidies, n = 14; rare autosomal trisomies (RATs), n = 16 and copy number variants (CNVs) >5Mb, n = 9. Overall, 24/53 (45.3%; CI 95%: 31.8%-59.4%) of cases with mosaicism were detected by cfNIPT; highest for RATs (56%) and lowest for CNVs (22%). CfNIPT more commonly detected high-level than low-level mosaic cases (p = 0.000). CfNIPT detected 7/16 (43.8%; CI 95%: 21%-69%) clinically significant mosaic cases, either true fetal mosaicism or confined placental mosaicisms with adverse pregnancy outcome. There was a trend toward a higher risk for adverse outcome in pregnancies where mosaicism was detected by cfNIPT compared to pregnancies where mosaicism was not detected by cfNIPT (p = 0.31). Conclusion: CfNIPT has a low detection rate of mosaicism, including pregnancies with clinically significant mosaicism. However, abnormal cfNIPT results may be a predictor of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:562 / 571
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome and the use of cell-free fetal DNA testing: Current knowledge and novel insights
    Sifakis, Stavros
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2015, 36 : S83 - S83
  • [32] Predicting fetoplacental chromosomal mosaicism during non-invasive prenatal testing
    Brison, N.
    Neofytou, M.
    Dehaspe, L.
    Bayindir, B.
    Van den Bogaert, K.
    Dardour, L.
    Peeters, H.
    Van Esch, H.
    Van Buggenhout, G.
    Vogels, A.
    Breckpot, J.
    de Ravel, T.
    Legius, E.
    Devriendt, K.
    Vermeesch, J. R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2019, 27 : 26 - 27
  • [33] Predicting fetoplacental chromosomal mosaicism during non-invasive prenatal testing
    Brison, Nathalie
    Neofytou, Maria
    Dehaspe, Luc
    Bayindir, Baran
    Van den Bogaert, Kris
    Dardour, Leila
    Peeters, Hilde
    Van Esch, Hilde
    Van Buggenhout, Griet
    Vogels, Annick
    de Ravel, Thomy
    Legius, Eric
    Devriendt, Koen
    Vermeesch, Joris R.
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2018, 38 (04) : 258 - 266
  • [34] Confined Placental Mosaicism Detected With Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: Is There an Association Between Mosaic Ratio and Pregnancy Outcome?
    Eggenhuizen, Geerke M.
    Go, Attie T. J. I.
    Hoffer, Mariette J. V.
    Goedegebuur-Zwalua, Eveline
    Srebniak, Malgorzata I.
    Van Opstal, Diane
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2024, 44 (12) : 1462 - 1469
  • [35] Two cases of placental T21 mosaicism: challenging the detection limits of non-invasive prenatal testing
    Wang, Yanlin
    Zhu, Jiansheng
    Chen, Yan
    Lu, Shoulian
    Chen, Biliang
    Zhao, Xinrong
    Wu, Yi
    Han, Xu
    Ma, Duan
    Liu, Zhongyin
    Cram, David
    Cheng, Weiwei
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2013, 33 (12) : 1207 - 1210
  • [36] The evolution of cell-free fetal DNA testing: expanded non-invasive prenatal testing and its effect on target populations
    Yang, Shaozhe
    He, Yanqi
    Lv, Jingshang
    Li, Rongxiang
    Fu, Xiuhong
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2025, 12
  • [37] Cell-free fetal DNA in non-invasive prenatal diagnosis and the prediction of preeclampsia
    Sifakis, Stavros
    Zaravinos, Apostolos
    Maiz, Nerea
    Kappou, Dimitra
    Koukou, Zeta
    Nicolaides, Kypros
    Spandidos, Demetrios A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2014, 34 : S112 - S112
  • [38] The accuracy of cell-free fetal DNA-based non-invasive prenatal testing in singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis
    Mackie, F. L.
    Hemming, K.
    Allen, S.
    Morris, R. K.
    Kilby, M. D.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 124 (01) : 32 - 46
  • [39] Integrity of cell-free DNA in maternal plasma extracellular vesicles as a potential biomarker for non-invasive prenatal testing
    Pan, Min
    Lu, Jiafeng
    Liu, Zhiyu
    Shi, Huajuan
    Bai, Yunfei
    Chen, Pingsheng
    Ge, Qinyu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 158 (02) : 406 - 417
  • [40] Non-invasive prenatal testing with cell-free DNA: US physician attitudes toward implementation in clinical practice
    Musci, Thomas J.
    Fairbrother, Genevieve
    Batey, Annette
    Bruursema, Jennifer
    Struble, Craig
    Song, Ken
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2013, 33 (05) : 424 - 428