Discomfort estimation for aircraft cabin noise using linear regression and modified psychoacoustic annoyance approaches

被引:1
作者
Huang, Yu [1 ,2 ]
Lv, Bingcong [1 ]
Ni, Ke [1 ]
Jiang, Weikang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Inst Vibrat Shock & Noise, Sch Mech Engn, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, State Key Lab Mech Syst & Vibrat, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
SOUND QUALITY; MODEL; IMPROVEMENT; COMFORT; ROAD; VIBRATION;
D O I
10.1121/10.0020838
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Appropriate sound quality models for noise-induced discomfort are necessary for a better acoustic comfort design in the aircraft cabin. This study investigates the acoustic discomfort in two large passenger aeroplanes (i.e., planes A and B). We recorded the noise at 21 positions in each aircraft cabin and selected 42 stimuli ranging from 72 to 81 dB(A) during the cruising flights. Twenty-four participants rated the noise discomfort by the absolute magnitude estimation method. The discomfort values in the middle section of the aircraft cabin are 10% points higher than in the front or rear section. The discomfort magnitude was dominated by loudness and influenced by roughness and sharpness. A multiple linear (MA) discomfort model was established, accounting for the relationship between the discomfort and sound quality metrics (i.e., loudness, sharpness, and roughness). The MA model estimated noise discomfort better than the Zwicker and other (i.e., More and Di) psychoacoustic annoyance (PA) models. We modified the coefficients of independent variables in the formulations of Zwicker, Di, and More PA models, respectively, according to the present experimental results. The correlation coefficients between the estimated and measured values of the modified models were at least 20% points higher than the original ones. (c) 2023 Acoustical Society of America.
引用
收藏
页码:1963 / 1976
页数:14
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Airbus, 2023, Cabin comfort can make such a difference to the passenger experience. This is why it is a major priority for Airbus
[2]  
Angerer D. A., 1991, NASA TM-104147
[3]   The rough sound of salience enhances aversion through neural synchronisation [J].
Arnal, Luc H. ;
Kleinschmidt, Andreas ;
Spinelli, Laurent ;
Giraud, Anne-Lise ;
Megevand, Pierre .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 10 (1)
[4]   Model-based synthesis of aircraft noise to quantify human perception of sound quality and annoyance [J].
Berckmans, D. ;
Janssens, K. ;
Van der Auweraer, H. ;
Sas, P. ;
Desmet, W. .
JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2008, 311 (3-5) :1175-1195
[5]   Ranking of Human Senses in Relation to Different In-flight Activities Contributing to the Comfort Experience of Airplane Passengers [J].
Bouwens, Joyce ;
Hiemstra-van Mastrigt, Suzanne ;
Vink, Peter .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AVIATION AERONAUTICS AND AEROSPACE, 2018, 5 (02) :1-15
[6]   A survey on exposure-response relationships for road, rail, and aircraft noise annoyance: Differences between continuous and intermittent noise [J].
Brink, Mark ;
Schaeffer, Beat ;
Vienneau, Danielle ;
Foraster, Maria ;
Pieren, Reto ;
Eze, Ikenna C. ;
Cajochen, Christian ;
Probst-Hensch, Nicole ;
Roeoesli, Martin ;
Wunderli, Jean-Marc .
ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 125 :277-290
[7]  
Castellan S. S., 1988, Nonparametric Statistics for the Social Sciences
[8]  
de Sa Lopes B. O., 2018, Sound Quality Predictive Models: Annoyance in the Interior of a Propeller Aircraft
[9]   Improvement of Zwicker's psychoacoustic annoyance model aiming at tonal noises [J].
Di, Guo-Qing ;
Chen, Xing-Wang ;
Song, Kai ;
Zhou, Bing ;
Pei, Chun-Ming .
APPLIED ACOUSTICS, 2016, 105 :164-170
[10]  
DIN 45692, 2009, Measurement Technique for the Simulation of the Auditory Sensation of Sharpness