DIFFERENCES IN QUANTITATIVE MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION MAPPING BY CMR AT 1.5T AND 3T

被引:0
|
作者
Javed, Wasim [1 ]
Goh, Z. [1 ]
Shabi, M. [1 ]
Sharrack, N. [1 ]
Gorecka, M. [1 ]
Levelt, E. [1 ]
Xue, H. [1 ]
Dall'Armellina, E. [1 ]
Kellman, P. [1 ]
Greenwood, J. P. [1 ]
Plein, S. [1 ]
Swoboda, P. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Cardiovasc & Metab Med, Dept Biomed Imaging Sci, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
D O I
10.1136/heartjnl-2022-BSCMR.18
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
18
引用
收藏
页码:A16 / A16
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Differences in quantitative myocardial perfusion mapping by CMR at 1.5 T and3T
    Abraham, George R.
    Berry, Colin
    Fu, Qing
    Hoole, Stephen P.
    Weir-McCall, Jonathan R.
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL PLUS: CARDIOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2024, 41
  • [2] Quantitative DCEMRI of the Breast at 1.5T and 3T
    Pineda, F.
    Medved, M.
    Fan, X.
    Ivancevic, M.
    Newstead, G.
    Abe, H.
    Sennett, C.
    Karczmar, G.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [3] 1.5T and 3T Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Reserve for Detection of Relevant Coronary Artery Stenosis - A Comparison to Fractional Flow Reserve
    Bernhardt, Peter
    Walcher, Thomas
    Rottbauer, Wolfgang
    Woehrle, Jochen
    CIRCULATION, 2012, 126 (21)
  • [4] BOLD and perfusion fMRI of generalised spike wave activity at 1.5T and 3T
    Hamandi, Khalid
    Laufs, Helmut
    Carmichael, David
    Noeth, Ulrike
    Paul, Joseph Suresh
    Duncan, John
    Lemieux, Louis
    EPILEPSIA, 2006, 47 : 70 - 70
  • [5] MR proton spectroscopy for myocardial lipid deposition quantification: A quantitative comparison between 1.5T and 3T
    Venkatesh, Bharath Ambale
    Lima, Joao A. C.
    Bluemke, David A.
    Lai, Shenghan
    Steenbergen, Charles
    Liu, Chia-Ying
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2012, 36 (05) : 1222 - 1230
  • [6] Reference values for regional and global myocardial T2 mapping with cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 1.5T and 3T
    Alicia M Maceira
    Jose Vicente Monmeneu
    Begoña Igual-Muñoz
    Pilar M Lopez-Lereu
    Pilar M Garcia
    Juan Cosin
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 17 (Suppl 1)
  • [7] Balanced left ventricular myocardial SSFP-tagging at 1.5T and 3T
    Markl, M.
    Scherer, S.
    Frydrychowicz, A.
    Burger, D.
    Geibel, A.
    Hennig, J.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2008, 60 (03) : 631 - 639
  • [8] Quantitative contrast ratio comparison between T1 (TSE at 1.5T, FLAIR at 3T), magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo and subtraction imaging at 1.5T and 3T
    Downs, Richard Keith
    Bashir, Mariah Haider
    Ng, Chin Kau
    Heidenreich, Jens Olaf
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2013, 3 (03) : 141 - 146
  • [9] Dark-Blood T1 SAPPHIRE mapping gives cleaner myocardial signal at both 1.5T and 3T
    Augusto, Bicho J. A.
    Alfarih, M.
    Knott, K.
    Radenkovic, D.
    Chaturvedi, N.
    Hughes, A. D.
    Boubertakh, R.
    Moon, J. C.
    Weingartner, S.
    Captur, G.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2019, 20 : 325 - 325
  • [10] T1 at 1.5T and 3T compared with conventional T2*at 1.5T for cardiac siderosis
    Alam, Mohammed H.
    Auger, Dominique
    Smith, Gillian C.
    He, Taigang
    Vassiliou, Vassilis
    Baksi, A. John
    Wage, Rick
    Drivas, Peter
    Feng, Yanqiu
    Firmin, David N.
    Pennell, Dudley J.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2015, 17