Fertility-Sparing Management of Early Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Narrative Review of the Literature

被引:0
|
作者
Montgomery, Alison [1 ]
Boo, Marilyn [2 ]
Chatterjee, Jayanta [3 ]
机构
[1] St Michaels Hosp, Dept Gynaecol, Bristol BS2 8EG, England
[2] Westmead Hosp, Dept Gynaecol Oncol, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
[3] Royal Surrey NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Gynaecol Oncol, Surrey GU2 7XX, England
来源
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY | 2023年 / 50卷 / 02期
关键词
endometrial cancer; fertility -sparing treatment; morbid obesity; fertility conservation; ATYPICAL HYPERPLASIA; YOUNG-WOMEN; HYSTEROSCOPIC RESECTION; INTRAUTERINE-DEVICE; PRESERVING TREATMENT; ORAL PROGESTIN; ADENOCARCINOMA; CARCINOMA; EFFICACY; RISK;
D O I
10.31083/j.ceog5002039
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: The incidence of endometrial cancer (EC) is rising largely due to the increasing levels of obesity along with an ageing population. This has led to an increase in the incidence of premenopausal women with EC. 5% of cases are in patients less than 40 years old, 70% of which are nulliparous at diagnosis. Therefore, fertility considerations must be taken into account when managing these patients. The objectives of this review are to present the fertility-sparing management options available. Mechanism: A detailed computerized literature search of PubMed and MEDLINE up to 1st June 2022 was carried out in order to survey the evidence for fertility -sparing treatment. Studies including patients with endometrial hyperplasia and early-stage EC undergoing fertility-sparing management were included. Findings in Brief: Progestin acts by downregulating oestrogen receptors, thereby suppressing endometrial growth. Oral progestins and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (IUS) have therefore been used as non-surgical hormonal treatment for EC. Megestrol acetate (MA) has been shown to produce the highest remission rates compared to other progestins in a systematic review and meta-analysis, but medroxyprogesterone acetate exhibited lower recurrence rates. The IUS for atypical hyperplasia (AH) and EC showed that the majority of patients responded by 3 months' use. A minimum duration of hormonal treatment for AH and EC of 6 months has been advocated, based on randomised studies showing greater efficacy when compared to 3 months treatment. A meta -analysis and systematic review assessing the efficacy of both oral and intra-uterine progestins showed a higher pooled complete response (CR) than with IUS alone. Metformin, gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists and weight loss have also been added to progestin regimes with variable results on EC regression. Hysteroscopic resection allows for targeted excision of early-stage EC, but with the risk of perforation and so this has not been recommended by the British Gynaecological Cancer Society or the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology. Assisted reproduction treatment (ART) may be the quickest way to achieve pregnancy once CR is achieved. Pregnancy rates have varied from 32-100%, with live birth rates varying from 17.9-43.8%. Conclusions: EC incidence is on the increase in the premenopausal population along with obesity rates and the average first age of parenthood. Fertility-sparing management of EC should be considered for women where fertility is desired.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fertility-Sparing Therapy in Young Women With Endometrial Cancer 2010 Update
    Erkanli, Serkan
    Ayhan, Ali
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2010, 20 (07) : 1170 - 1187
  • [32] Fertility-sparing treatment using medroxyprogesterone acetate for endometrial carcinoma
    Fujiwara, Hiroyuki
    Jobo, Toshiko
    Takei, Yuji
    Saga, Yasushi
    Imai, Manami
    Arai, Tsutomu
    Taneichi, Akiyo
    Machida, Shizuo
    Takahashi, Yoshifumi
    Suzuki, Mitsuaki
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2012, 3 (05) : 1002 - 1006
  • [33] Fertility-Sparing Management of Endometrial Adenocarcinoma
    Dorais, Jessie
    Dodson, Mark
    Calvert, Jacob
    Mize, Benjamin
    Travarelli, Jennifer Mitchell
    Jasperson, Kory
    Peterson, Charles Matthew
    Soisson, Andrew P.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2011, 66 (07) : 443 - 451
  • [34] A systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors for remission in fertility-sparing management of endometrial atypical hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma
    Guillon, Sarah
    Popescu, Nathalie
    Phelippeau, Juliette
    Koskas, Martin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2019, 146 (03) : 277 - 288
  • [35] Comparison of fertility-sparing treatments in patients with early endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Wei, Jing
    Zhang, Weiyuan
    Feng, Limin
    Gao, Wanli
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (37)
  • [36] IVF impact on the risk of recurrence of endometrial adenocarcinoma after fertility-sparing management
    Vaugon, Mailys
    Peigne, Maeliss
    Phelippeau, Juliette
    Gonthier, Clementine
    Koskas, Martin
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2021, 43 (03) : 495 - 502
  • [37] Fertility-sparing treatment of endometrial cancer: options, outcomes and pitfalls
    Kesterson, Joshua P.
    Fanning, James
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 (02) : 120 - 124
  • [38] Progression of fertility-sparing treatment for atypical endometrial hyperplasia in a woman with lynch syndrome: a case report and review of the literature
    Hsu, Ya-Ting
    Chen, Chi-Hau
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [39] Cancer Incidence in Patients with Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia Managed by Primary Hysterectomy or Fertility-sparing Treatment
    Gonthier, Clementine
    Piel, Bruno
    Touboul, Cyril
    Walker, Francine
    Cortez, Annie
    Luton, Dominique
    Darai, Emile
    Koskas, Martin
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 35 (12) : 6799 - 6804
  • [40] Mismatch repair status influences response to fertility-sparing treatment of endometrial cancer
    Chung, Young Shin
    Woo, Ha Young
    Lee, Jung-Yun
    Park, Eunhyang
    Nam, Eun Ji
    Kim, Sunghoon
    Kim, Sang Wun
    Kim, Young Tae
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (04) : 370.e1 - 370.e13