Fertility-Sparing Management of Early Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Narrative Review of the Literature

被引:0
|
作者
Montgomery, Alison [1 ]
Boo, Marilyn [2 ]
Chatterjee, Jayanta [3 ]
机构
[1] St Michaels Hosp, Dept Gynaecol, Bristol BS2 8EG, England
[2] Westmead Hosp, Dept Gynaecol Oncol, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
[3] Royal Surrey NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Gynaecol Oncol, Surrey GU2 7XX, England
来源
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY | 2023年 / 50卷 / 02期
关键词
endometrial cancer; fertility -sparing treatment; morbid obesity; fertility conservation; ATYPICAL HYPERPLASIA; YOUNG-WOMEN; HYSTEROSCOPIC RESECTION; INTRAUTERINE-DEVICE; PRESERVING TREATMENT; ORAL PROGESTIN; ADENOCARCINOMA; CARCINOMA; EFFICACY; RISK;
D O I
10.31083/j.ceog5002039
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: The incidence of endometrial cancer (EC) is rising largely due to the increasing levels of obesity along with an ageing population. This has led to an increase in the incidence of premenopausal women with EC. 5% of cases are in patients less than 40 years old, 70% of which are nulliparous at diagnosis. Therefore, fertility considerations must be taken into account when managing these patients. The objectives of this review are to present the fertility-sparing management options available. Mechanism: A detailed computerized literature search of PubMed and MEDLINE up to 1st June 2022 was carried out in order to survey the evidence for fertility -sparing treatment. Studies including patients with endometrial hyperplasia and early-stage EC undergoing fertility-sparing management were included. Findings in Brief: Progestin acts by downregulating oestrogen receptors, thereby suppressing endometrial growth. Oral progestins and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (IUS) have therefore been used as non-surgical hormonal treatment for EC. Megestrol acetate (MA) has been shown to produce the highest remission rates compared to other progestins in a systematic review and meta-analysis, but medroxyprogesterone acetate exhibited lower recurrence rates. The IUS for atypical hyperplasia (AH) and EC showed that the majority of patients responded by 3 months' use. A minimum duration of hormonal treatment for AH and EC of 6 months has been advocated, based on randomised studies showing greater efficacy when compared to 3 months treatment. A meta -analysis and systematic review assessing the efficacy of both oral and intra-uterine progestins showed a higher pooled complete response (CR) than with IUS alone. Metformin, gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists and weight loss have also been added to progestin regimes with variable results on EC regression. Hysteroscopic resection allows for targeted excision of early-stage EC, but with the risk of perforation and so this has not been recommended by the British Gynaecological Cancer Society or the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology. Assisted reproduction treatment (ART) may be the quickest way to achieve pregnancy once CR is achieved. Pregnancy rates have varied from 32-100%, with live birth rates varying from 17.9-43.8%. Conclusions: EC incidence is on the increase in the premenopausal population along with obesity rates and the average first age of parenthood. Fertility-sparing management of EC should be considered for women where fertility is desired.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fertility-sparing treatment in women with endometrial cancer
    Won, Seyeon
    Kim, Mi Kyoung
    Seong, Seok Ju
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE-CERM, 2020, 47 (04): : 237 - 244
  • [22] Fertility-Sparing Treatments in Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Review on Efficacy, Oncological Outcomes, and Reproductive Potential
    Ronsini, Carlo
    Romeo, Paola
    Andreoli, Giada
    Palmara, Vittorio
    Palumbo, Marco
    Caruso, Giuseppe
    De Franciscis, Pasquale
    Vizzielli, Giuseppe
    Restaino, Stefano
    Chiantera, Vito
    Cianci, Stefano
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2025, 61 (03):
  • [23] Regression, relapse, and live birth rates with fertility-sparing therapy for endometrial cancer and atypical complex endometrial hyperplasia: a systematic review and metaanalysis
    Gallos, Ioannis D.
    Yap, Jason
    Rajkhowa, Madhurima
    Luesley, David M.
    Coomarasamy, Arri
    Gupta, Janesh K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 207 (04)
  • [24] The results of different fertility-sparing treatment modalities and obstetric outcomes in patients with early endometrial cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia: Case series of 30 patients and systematic review
    Piatek, Szymon
    Michalski, Wojciech
    Sobiczewski, Piotr
    Bidzinski, Mariusz
    Szewczyk, Grzegorz
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 263 : 139 - 147
  • [25] Fertility-Sparing Treatment Options in Young Patients with Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer
    Caliskan, Eray
    Karadag, Cihan
    CURRENT OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY REPORTS, 2020, 9 (01) : 21 - 26
  • [26] Fertility-Sparing Methods in Adolescents Affected by Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Review
    Galczynski, Krzysztof
    Olcha, Piotr
    Romanek-Piva, Katarzyna
    Jozwik, Maciej
    Semczuk, Andrzej
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (05) : 1 - 17
  • [27] Fertility-sparing approach for endometrial cancer: the role of office hysteroscopy
    Carugno, Jose
    Wong, Adriana
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2021, 30 (05) : 296 - 303
  • [28] Analysis of pregnancy-associated factors after fertility-sparing therapy in young women with early stage endometrial cancer or atypical endometrial hyperplasia
    Fan, Yuan
    Li, Xingchen
    Wang, Jiaqi
    Wang, Yiqin
    Tian, Li
    Wang, Jianliu
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [29] Fertility-sparing treatment in early endometrial cancer: current state and future strategies
    Obermair, Andreas
    Baxter, Eva
    Brennan, Donal J.
    McAlpine, Jessica N.
    Mueller, Jennifer J.
    Amant, Frederic
    van Gent, Mignon D. J. M.
    Coleman, Robert L.
    Westin, Shannon N.
    Yates, Melinda S.
    Krakstad, Camilla
    Janda, Monika
    OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY SCIENCE, 2020, 63 (04) : 417 - 431
  • [30] Potential of molecular classification to guide fertility-sparing management among young patients with endometrial cancer
    Agusti, Nuria
    Kanbergs, Alexa
    Nitecki, Roni
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2024, 185 : 121 - 127