Behind the curtain of the editorial process: how editors decide!

被引：0
作者：
Sardari Nia, Peyman [1 ,2 ]
Merrifield, Ash [2 ]
Siepe, Matthias [2 ,3 ]
机构：
[1] Maastricht Univ Med Ctr, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] European Assoc Cardiothorac EACTS Surg House, Windsor, England
[3] Inselspital Bern, Dept Cardiac Surg, Bern, Switzerland
来源：
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY | 2023年 / 63卷 / 02期
关键词：
Peer-review; Editorial process;
D O I：
10.1093/ejcts/ezad068
中图分类号：
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号：
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页数：2
相关论文
共 47 条
[31]   Analysis of submissions, editorial and peer-review process, and outcome of manuscripts submitted to the Indian Journal of Dermatology Venereology and Leprology over a 6-month period [J].
Gupta, Vishal ;
Bhatia, Riti ;
Pathak, Mona ;
Ramam, M. .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY VENEREOLOGY & LEPROLOGY, 2020, 86 (05) :519-525
[32]   Journeying Through Journals: The Publishing Process and How to Maximise Research Impact [J].
Madden, Judith C. ;
Kandarova, Helena ;
Neuhaus, Winfried ;
Osborne, Nikki ;
Paini, Alicia ;
Seabra, Rita ;
Trigwell, Susan .
ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2024, 52 (06) :334-351
[33]   Review by (non)peers as an opportunity for learning: a case study on the editorial process of papers by junior researchers [J].
Pedrazzini, Ana ;
Bautista, Alfredo ;
Scheuer, Nora ;
Monereo, Carles .
INFANCIA Y APRENDIZAJE, 2014, 37 (04) :851-901
[34]   The Review and Editorial Process at Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes The Worst System, Except for All the Others [J].
Burke, James F. ;
Nallamothu, Brahmajee K. ;
Ho, P. Michael .
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2017, 10 (05)
[35]   A multilevel modelling approach to investigating the predictive validity of editorial decisions: do the editors of a high profile journal select manuscripts that are highly cited after publication? [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
Mutz, Ruediger ;
Marx, Werner ;
Schier, Hermann ;
Daniel, Hans-Dieter .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2011, 174 :857-879
[36]   How qualitative criteria can improve the assessment process of interdisciplinary research proposals [J].
Scholvinck, Anne-Floor ;
Uygun-Tunc, Duygu ;
Lakens, Daniel ;
Vaesen, Krist ;
Hessels, Laurens K. .
RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2024, 33
[37]   Gender diversity of editorial boards and gender differences in the peer review process at six journals of ecology and evolution [J].
Fox, Charles W. ;
Duffy, Meghan A. ;
Fairbairn, Daphne J. ;
Meyer, Jennifer A. .
ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2019, 9 (24) :13636-13649
[38]   No System Is Perfect: Understanding How Registration-Based Editorial Processes Affect Reproducibility and Investment in Research Quality [J].
Bloomfield, Robert ;
Rennekamp, Kristina ;
Steenhoven, Blake .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2018, 56 (02) :313-362
[39]   Adherence to reporting guidelines increases the number of citations: the argument for including a methodologist in the editorial process and peer-review [J].
Vilaro, Marta ;
Cortes, Jordi ;
Selva-O'Callaghan, Albert ;
Urrutia, Agustin ;
Ribera, Josep-Maria ;
Cardellach, Francesc ;
Basagana, Xavier ;
Elmore, Matthew ;
Vilardell, Miquel ;
Altman, Douglas ;
Gonzalez, Jose-Antonio ;
Cobo, Erik .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)
[40]   Point and Click Data: An Assessment of Editorial Perceptions and Recommendations for the Peer-Review Process in the New Data Frontier [J].
Thibodeau, Jay C. ;
Williams, L. Tyler ;
Witte, Annie L. .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2019, 33 (01) :129-144
12345