Exploring layers of context-related work-from-home demands during COVID-19

被引:21
作者
Manroop, Laxmikant [1 ]
Petrovski, Daniela [2 ]
机构
[1] Eastern Michigan Univ, Coll Business, Ypsilanti, MI 48197 USA
[2] York Univ, Keele Campus, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Affective reactions; Coping; COVID-19; Pandemic; Work-from-home; VIRTUAL WORK; IMPACT; JOB; PERFORMANCE; UNPACKING; EMPLOYEE;
D O I
10.1108/PR-06-2021-0459
中图分类号
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose This article identifies the contextual demands impacting the work from home (WFH) experience during the COVID-19 pandemic and considers their respective impact on employees' personal and work-related outcomes. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on a qualitative methodology, the authors thematically analyzed written narratives from 41 employees who had been required to work from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. Findings Data analysis identified four layers of contextual demands (omnibus, task, social and personal) that had resulted in participants being required to work from home. Drawing on this finding, the authors develop a conceptual process model to extend current theory and explain how the respective demands impact individual affective reactions and work-related experiences, health and wellbeing. The authors' findings offer new insights into contexts where WFH becomes mandatory, indicating that it is characterized by a range of challenges and opportunities. Practical implications This paper signals the need to provide employees with a realistic preview of working from home demands, including interventions to better prepare them to navigate the daily stressors of working from home; and provision of virtual employee assistance programs in the form of online counseling. Originality/value This paper explores a unique phenomenon - the mandatory requirement to work from home during the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on employees' personal and work-related experiences and outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1708 / 1727
页数:20
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Researchers working from home: Benefits and challenges
    Aczel, Balazs
    Kovacs, Marton
    van der Lippe, Tanja
    Szaszi, Barnabas
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (03):
  • [2] The Covid-19 crisis as a career shock: Implications for careers and vocational behavior
    Akkermans, Jos
    Richardson, Julia
    Kraimer, Maria L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2020, 119
  • [3] From surviving to thriving in the gig economy: A research agenda for individuals in the new world of work
    Ashford, Susan J.
    Caza, Brianna Barker
    Reid, Erin M.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR: AN ANNUAL SERIES OF ANALYTICAL ESSAYS AND CRITICAL REVIEWS, VOL 38, 2018, 38 : 23 - 41
  • [4] Azarbouyeh A., 2014, Management Science Letters, V4, P1063, DOI DOI 10.5267/J.MSL.2014.5.027
  • [5] The role of organisational support in teleworker wellbeing: A socio-technical systems approach
    Bentley, T. A.
    Teo, S. T. T.
    McLeod, L.
    Tan, F.
    Bosua, R.
    Gloet, M.
    [J]. APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2016, 52 : 207 - 215
  • [6] Blair-Loy M., 2003, COMPETING DEVOTIONS
  • [7] Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment
    Bloom, Nicholas
    Liang, James
    Roberts, John
    Ying, Zhichun Jenny
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2015, 130 (01) : 165 - 218
  • [8] Braun V., 2006, Qualitative research in psychology, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA]
  • [9] The impact of a large-scale traumatic event on individual and organizational outcomes: exploring employee and company reactions to September 11, 2001
    Byron, K
    Peterson, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2002, 23 (08) : 895 - 910
  • [10] Personality and Coping
    Carver, Charles S.
    Connor-Smith, Jennifer
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 61 : 679 - 704