Legal construct of usufruct in roman private law

被引:1
作者
Biryukov, Aleksandr [1 ]
Zakharova, Galina [1 ]
Melnichuk, Marina [1 ]
Savina, Victoria [1 ,2 ]
Shevchenko, Alyona [1 ]
机构
[1] North Caucasus Fed Univ, Stavropol, Russia
[2] Plekhanov Russian Univ Econ, Moscow, Russia
来源
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE DIREITO | 2023年 / 19卷 / 01期
关键词
Roman Law; Usufruct; Property Law; Limited Property Rights; Real Property; Real Estate;
D O I
10.18256/2238-0604.2023.v19i1.4923
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The institution of rights to other people's property (limited proprietary rights) is familiar to the civilized systems of many states. It is manifested both in the codifications of countries in the continental law family and in statute and precedent law in countries of Anglo-Saxon law. One of the most popular rights in this category (along with superficies and emphyteusis) is limited use of other people's real estate (servitude), pledge, and usufruct. By analyzing the sources of Roman private law (the Digest, the Institutes of Gaius), the study examines the classical usufruct model and its impact on the establishment of contemporary legislation on proprietary rights. It is concluded that the primary features of usufruct, among which are fixedterm (lifetime) limited use of another's movable or immovable property with the possibility of its natural and civil benefits being extracted by a certain person responsible for preserving the economic purpose of the object, were formed in classical Roman law and later reflected in the civil legislation of European countries, Asian countries, Latin America, and others.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
ABDRASHITOV Vagil, 1984, Digesty Iustiniana. Izbrannye fragmenty v perevode i s primechaniiami I. S. Pereterskogo. The Digest of Justinian. Selected fragments
[2]  
Alekseev S.S., Chasti pervaia, vtoraia, tretia, chetvertaia (postateinyi). Commentary to the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (educational and practical)
[3]  
ALEMANHA, 2023, Burgerliches Gesetzbuch in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 2. Januar 2002, das zuletzt durch Artikel 4 des Gesetzes vom 25. Oktober 2023
[4]  
BABAITSEV Elena Anatolyevna, 2009, Sovremennoe Pravo, P8
[5]  
BARTOSZEK Mariola, 1989, Rimskoe pravo: Poniatiia, terminy, opredeleniia. Roman law: concept, terms, definitions
[6]  
Berger Adolf., 1991, ENCY DICT ROMAN LAW
[7]  
BOGOLEPOV Nikolay Pavlovich, 1890, Posobie k lektsiiam po istorii rimskogo prava. Manual for lectures on the history of Roman law
[8]  
DORN L., 1871, Ob uzufrukte po rimskomu pravu. On the usufruct on Roman law
[9]  
Dydynskii F., 1891, Institutsii
[10]  
EMELKINA Irina Aleksandrovna, 2020, Grazhdanskoe pravo sotsialnogo gosudarstva: sbornik statei, posviashchennyi 90-letiiu so dnia rozhdeniia professora, P74