Expert Evidence of "Risk Assessments" and the Preventive Detention of "Dangerous Prisoners"

被引:0
作者
Beran, Roy G. [1 ,2 ]
Coyle, Ian [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Freckelton, Ian [9 ,10 ,11 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Hlth, West Moreton Prison Mental Hlth Serv, Brisbane, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Med, Brisbane, Australia
[3] Australian Forens & Personal Injury Consultants, Southport, Australia
[4] Australian Catholic Univ, Thomas More Law Sch, Fitzroy, Australia
[5] La Trobe Univ, Sch Law, Bundoora, Australia
[6] La Trobe Univ, Sch Psychol & Publ Hlth, Bundoora, Australia
[7] Univ Southern Queensland, Sch Psychol & Counselling, Darling Hts, Australia
[8] La Trobe Univ, Bundoora, Australia
[9] Castan Chambers, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[10] Univ Melbourne, Fac Med Dent & Hlth Sci, Law, Melbourne, Australia
[11] Univ Melbourne, Fac Med Dent & Hlth Sci, Dept Psychiat, Melbourne, Australia
[12] Monash Univ, Forens Med, Clayton, Australia
关键词
expert evidence; risk assessment; preventive detention; dangerous prisoners; sex offenders; child sexual exploitation material; CHILD SEXUAL-ABUSE; OFFENDER RECIDIVISM RISK; PCL-R SCORES; ACTUARIAL RISK; PSYCHOPATHY CHECKLIST; PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY; PORNOGRAPHY OFFENDERS; VIOLENT PREDATORS; ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS; ANTISOCIAL PERSONALITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The Dangerous Prisoners (Sexual Offenders) Act 2003 (Qld) provides for the preventive detention of a prisoner if there is "acceptable, cogent evidence" to a "high degree of probability" that the prisoner is a "serious danger to the community" because of an "unacceptable risk" that the prisoner will commit a "serious sexual offence". In preventive detention cases courts rely on the expert opinion of psychiatrists and psychologists who often use actuarial risk assessment instruments. In Black v Attorney-General (Qld) [2022] QCA 253 the Queensland Court of Appeal considered a decision to detain an offender who had a history of possessing and trading child sexual exploitation material but who had not previously been proved to have committed a contact offence against a child. This article analyses the reasoning of the Court of Appeal and critically examines the reliability of probabilistic risk assessment tools and the validity of expert evidence about risk in the preventive detention context.
引用
收藏
页数:264
相关论文
共 513 条
[11]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Human Rights Act
[12]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Cornwall v Attorney -General (NSW)
[13]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa
[14]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Harvey v Attorney -General (Qld)
[15]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Attorney-General (Qld) v Sambo
[16]  
[Anonymous], 2010, R v Fardon
[17]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Attorney-General (Qld) v Black
[18]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Attorney-General (Qld) v Francis
[19]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Turnbull v Attorney-General (Qld)
[20]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Attorney -General (Qld) v WW