Effects of Medicare Part D coverage gap closure on utilization of branded and generic drugs

被引:2
作者
Liu, Judith [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yuting [1 ,4 ]
Kaplan, Cameron M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Inst Appl Econ & Social Res, Fac Business & Econ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Oklahoma, Dept Econ, Norman, OK USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Gehr Ctr Hlth Syst Sci & Innovat, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Inst Appl Econ & Social Res, Fac Business & Econ, Room 543,FBE Bldg,111 Barry St, Carlton, Vic 3010, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
coverage gap; generic entry; health insurance; Medicare Part D; prescription drugs; BEHAVIOR; DEMAND;
D O I
10.1002/hec.4637
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The Affordable Care Act included a provision to gradually eliminate the Medicare prescription drug coverage gap between 2011 and 2020, which substantially lower medication costs in the gap. Using 2007-2016 Medicare claims data, we estimate how filling the gap affects individuals' out-of-pocket spending and medication use, separately for branded and generic drugs. One important difficulty in estimating the policy impact is that around the same time, many blockbuster drugs commonly used by the Medicare population experienced patent expiration and began to see generic entry. Because generic entries affected different therapeutic classes at different times, we run difference-in-differences models by therapeutic category at the beneficiary-month level to isolate the effect of the gap closure from that of generic entry. Overall, we find that filling the gap substantially reduced out-of-pocket spending and increased the use of branded drugs, which had larger discount rates during the analysis period. Beneficiaries reaching the gap, at older ages, or with comorbidities experienced larger reduction in out-of-pocket spending. We show that without accounting for generic entry, the effect of filling the coverage gap on medication use is underestimated for branded drugs and overestimated for generic drugs.
引用
收藏
页码:639 / 653
页数:15
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Has The Era Of Slow Growth For Prescription Drug Spending Ended? [J].
Aitken, Murray ;
Berndt, Ernst R. ;
Cutler, David ;
Kleinrock, Michael ;
Maini, Luca .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2016, 35 (09) :1595-1603
[2]   Prescription Drug Spending Trends In The United States: Looking Beyond The Turning Point [J].
Aitken, Murray ;
Berndt, Ernst R. ;
Cutler, David M. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2009, 28 (01) :W151-W160
[3]   MORAL HAZARD IN HEALTH INSURANCE: DO DYNAMIC INCENTIVES MATTER? [J].
Aron-Dine, Aviva ;
Einav, Liran ;
Finkelstein, Amy ;
Cullen, Mark .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2015, 97 (04) :725-741
[4]  
Branstetter L., 2014, NATL BUREAU EC RES W, V20532
[5]   Regulation and welfare: evidence from paragraph IV generic entry in the pharmaceutical industry [J].
Branstetter, Lee ;
Chatterjee, Chirantan ;
Higgins, Matthew J. .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2016, 47 (04) :857-890
[6]  
Ding H., 2021, NATL BUR EC RES WORK, V28457
[7]   The Effect of Medicare Part D on Pharmaceutical Prices and Utilization [J].
Duggan, Mark ;
Morton, Fiona Scott .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2010, 100 (01) :590-607
[8]   Private Provision of Social Insurance: Drug-Specific Price Elasticities and Cost Sharing in Medicare Part D [J].
Einav, Liran ;
Finkelstein, Amy ;
Polyakova, Maria .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2018, 10 (03) :122-153
[9]   Predictive modeling of US health care spending in late life [J].
Einav, Liran ;
Finkelstein, Amy ;
Mullainathan, Sendhil ;
Obermeyer, Ziad .
SCIENCE, 2018, 360 (6396) :1462-+
[10]   THE RESPONSE OF DRUG EXPENDITURE TO NONLINEAR CONTRACT DESIGN: EVIDENCE FROM MEDICARE PART D [J].
Einav, Liran ;
Finkelstein, Amy ;
Schrimpf, Paul .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2015, 130 (02) :841-899