Efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage for the treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Jiang, Yu [1 ]
Liu, Yang [2 ]
Liu, Nian [1 ]
Qin, Shize [1 ]
Zhong, Shuting [1 ]
Huang, Xiaohua [1 ]
机构
[1] North Sichuan Med Coll, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Radiol, 63 Wenhua Rd, Nanchong 637000, Peoples R China
[2] North Sichuan Med Coll, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Urol, Nanchong, Peoples R China
关键词
Caesarean scar pregnancy; high-intensity focused ultrasound; suction curettage; clinical efficacy; safety; favourable reproductive outcomes; UTERINE ARTERY EMBOLIZATION; CLINICAL-EFFICACY; METHOTREXATE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1080/02656736.2024.2310019
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeCaesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) presents a significant clinical challenge owing to the associated risks of uterine scar rupture, severe haemorrhage and adverse maternal outcomes. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of combining high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) with suction curettage for treating CSP.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search in four databases, namely PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library, to identify published studies evaluating the use of HIFU combined with suction curettage to treat CSP. Intraoperative blood loss, treatment success rate, and reproductive results were the primary outcomes assessed.ResultsA total of 18 studies involving 1251 patients with CSP, all of whom received preoperative HIFU therapy were included. The average hospital stay was 6.22 days, the intraoperative blood loss was 26.29 ml and the incidence of adverse events was 15.60%, including abdominal or lower limb pain, fever, vaginal bleeding, haematuria and vomiting. Furthermore, post-treatment follow-up showed that serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin levels were rapidly normalized (average of 25.48 days) and menstruation returned (average of 33.03 days). The treatment had a remarkable success rate of 97.60% and a subsequent pregnancy rate of 68.70%.ConclusionWhile the combination of HIFU and suction-curettage may induce common adverse effects such as lower abdominal or limb pain, these reactions typically do not necessitate therapeutic intervention. Additionally, the size of the gestational sac is a determinant of the procedure's success. In conclusion, HIFU combined with suction curettage demonstrates promising clinical efficacy, safety and favourable reproductive outcomes in managing CSP.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Caesarean scar pregnancy [J].
Ash, A. ;
Smith, A. ;
Maxwell, D. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 114 (03) :253-263
[2]   Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy Clinical Classification System With Recommended Surgical Strategy [J].
Ban, Yanli ;
Shen, Jia ;
Wang, Xia ;
Zhang, Teng ;
Lu, Xuxu ;
Qu, Wenjie ;
Hao, Yiping ;
Mao, Zhonghao ;
Li, Shizhen ;
Tao, Guowei ;
Wang, Fang ;
Zhao, Ying ;
Zhang, Xiaolei ;
Zhang, Yuan ;
Zhang, Guiyu ;
Cui, Baoxia .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 141 (05) :927-936
[3]   Analysis of the Reproductive Outcome of Patients with Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Treated by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization: A Retrospective Cohort Study [J].
Chen, Lixing ;
Xiao, Songshu ;
Zhu, Xiaogang ;
He, Sili ;
Xue, Min .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 26 (05) :883-890
[4]   Risk Factors for Haemorrhage during Suction Curettage after Uterine Artery Embolization for Treating Caesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Case-Control Study [J].
Du, Yong Jiang ;
Zhang, Xiao Hui ;
Wang, Li Quan .
GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2015, 80 (04) :259-264
[5]   A Retrospective Analysis of the Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound, Uterine Artery Embolization and Surgery [J].
Fang, Shanyu ;
Zhang, Ping ;
Zhu, Yuanfang ;
Wang, Fen ;
He, Linsheng .
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2020, 7
[6]   Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Systematic Review [J].
Gonzalez, Natalia ;
Tulandi, Togas .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 24 (05) :731-738
[7]   Cesarean Scar Pregnancy, Incidence, and Recurrence Five-Year Experience at a Single Tertiary Care Referral Center [J].
Grechukhina, Olga ;
Deshmukh, Uma ;
Fan, Linda ;
Kohari, Katherine ;
Abdel-Razeq, Sonya ;
Bahtiyar, Mert Ozan ;
Sfakianaki, Anna K. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 132 (05) :1285-1295
[8]   Outcome of high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization in the treatment and management of cesarean scar pregnancy: A retrospective study [J].
Hong, Yufeng ;
Guo, Quanwei ;
Pu, Yingjie ;
Lu, Dongmei ;
Hu, Min .
MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (30)
[9]   High-intensity focused ultrasound combined with dilatation and curettage for Cesarean scar pregnancy [J].
Huang, L. ;
Du, Y. ;
Zhao, C. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 43 (01) :98-101
[10]  
Huo XK, 2020, JCPSP-J COLL PHYSICI, V30, P240, DOI 10.29271/jcpsp.2020.03.240