Profiles of theory of mind impairments and personality in clinical and community samples: integrating the alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders

被引:0
作者
Lampron, Mireille [1 ]
Achim, Amelie M. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Gamache, Dominick [2 ,5 ]
Bernier, Allyson [1 ]
Sabourin, Stephane [1 ]
Savard, Claudia [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Sch Psychol, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[2] CERVO Brain Res Ctr, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Laval, Dept Psychiat & Neurosci, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[4] VITAM Ctr Rech Sante Durable, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Quebec Trois Rivieres, Dept Psychol, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[6] Univ Laval, Dept Educ Fundamentals & Pract, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
关键词
theory of mind; personality disorders; DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders; personality functioning; personality traits; SOCIAL COGNITION; ASPERGER-SYNDROME; BORDERLINE; SCHIZOPHRENIA; ADULTS; INTELLIGENCE; RELIABILITY; DYSFUNCTION; CHILDREN; EMOTION;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1292680
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
IntroductionDeficits in theory of mind (ToM)-the ability to infer the mental states of others-have been linked to antagonistic traits in community samples. ToM deficits have also been identified in people with personality disorders (PD), although with conflicting evidence, partly due to the use of categorical diagnoses. The DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) provides an opportunity for a more precise understanding of the interplay between ToM abilities and personality pathology. Therefore, the study aims to determine whether and how individuals with diverse ToM profiles differ regarding personality impairment (AMPD Criterion A) and pathological facets (AMPD Criterion B).MethodAdults with PD (n = 39) and from the community (n = 42) completed tests assessing ToM skills and self-reported questionnaires assessing AMPD Criteria A and B. Hierarchical agglomerative and TwoStep cluster analyses were consecutively computed using scores and subscores from ToM tests as clustering variables. Multivariate analyses of variance were subsequently performed to compare the clusters on both AMPD Criteria. Five clinically and conceptually meaningful clusters were found. The most notable differences across clusters were observed for Intimacy and Empathy dysfunctions (Criterion A), as well as for the Deceitfulness, Callousness, and Hostility facets from the Antagonism domain and the Restricted affectivity facet from the Detachment domain (Criterion B).DiscussionThe results support the association between antagonistic personality facets and ToM deficits. However, clusters showing impairments in ToM abilities did not necessarily exhibit high levels of personality dysfunction or pathological facets, emphasizing that both constructs are not isomorphic. Nevertheless, specific profiles can help refine existing interventions to make them more sensitive and specific to the nature of ToM dysfunctions while considering personality functioning and facets.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 78 条
[51]   Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation: Results of the Final Validation Study [J].
Pinkham, Amy E. ;
Harvey, Philip D. ;
Penn, David L. .
SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2018, 44 (04) :737-748
[52]   The Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation Study: Results of the Expert Survey and RAND Panel [J].
Pinkham, Amy E. ;
Penn, David L. ;
Green, Michael F. ;
Buck, Benjamin ;
Healey, Kristin ;
Harvey, Philip D. .
SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2014, 40 (04) :813-823
[53]   The Psychometric Properties of the French Version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 [J].
Roskam, Isabelle ;
Galdiolo, Sarah ;
Hansenne, Michel ;
Massoudi, Koorosh ;
Rossier, Jerome ;
Gicquel, Ludovic ;
Rolland, Jean-Pierre .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (07)
[54]  
Sahin B., 2019, Psikiyatride Guncel Yaklasimlar-Current Approaches in Psychiatry, V11, P24
[55]   Dysfunction of Empathy and Related Processes in Borderline Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review [J].
Salgado, Rui M. ;
Pedrosa, Raquel ;
Bastos-Leite, Antonio J. .
HARVARD REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 28 (04) :238-254
[56]  
Sarstedt M., 2019, A concise guide to market research the process, data, and methods, using IBM SPSS statistics, V3rd, P347
[57]   Normal mind-reading capacity but higher response confidence in borderline personality disorder patients [J].
Schilling, Lisa ;
Wingenfeld, Katja ;
Loewe, Bernd ;
Moritz, Steffen ;
Terfehr, Kirsten ;
Koether, Ulf ;
Spitzer, Carsten .
PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2012, 66 (04) :322-327
[58]   Exploring the Dark Side of Personality: Emotional Awareness, Empathy, and the Dark Triad Traits in an Italian Sample [J].
Schimmenti, Adriano ;
Jonason, Peter K. ;
Passanisi, Alessia ;
La Marca, Luana ;
Di Dio, Nunzia ;
Gervasi, Alessia M. .
CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 38 (01) :100-109
[59]   Fractionating theory of mind: A meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies [J].
Schurz, Matthias ;
Radua, Joaquim ;
Aichhorn, Markus ;
Richlan, Fabio ;
Perner, Josef .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2014, 42 :9-34
[60]   METACOGNITIVE DYSFUNCTIONS IN PERSONALITY DISORDERS: CORRELATIONS WITH DISORDER SEVERITY AND PERSONALITY STYLES [J].
Semerari, Antonio ;
Colle, Livia ;
Pellecchia, Giovanni ;
Buccione, Ivana ;
Carcione, Antonino ;
Dimaggio, Giancarlo ;
Nicolo, Giuseppe ;
Procacci, Michele ;
Pedone, Roberto .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2014, 28 (06) :751-766