Profiles of theory of mind impairments and personality in clinical and community samples: integrating the alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders

被引:0
作者
Lampron, Mireille [1 ]
Achim, Amelie M. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Gamache, Dominick [2 ,5 ]
Bernier, Allyson [1 ]
Sabourin, Stephane [1 ]
Savard, Claudia [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Sch Psychol, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[2] CERVO Brain Res Ctr, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Laval, Dept Psychiat & Neurosci, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[4] VITAM Ctr Rech Sante Durable, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Quebec Trois Rivieres, Dept Psychol, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[6] Univ Laval, Dept Educ Fundamentals & Pract, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
关键词
theory of mind; personality disorders; DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders; personality functioning; personality traits; SOCIAL COGNITION; ASPERGER-SYNDROME; BORDERLINE; SCHIZOPHRENIA; ADULTS; INTELLIGENCE; RELIABILITY; DYSFUNCTION; CHILDREN; EMOTION;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1292680
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
IntroductionDeficits in theory of mind (ToM)-the ability to infer the mental states of others-have been linked to antagonistic traits in community samples. ToM deficits have also been identified in people with personality disorders (PD), although with conflicting evidence, partly due to the use of categorical diagnoses. The DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) provides an opportunity for a more precise understanding of the interplay between ToM abilities and personality pathology. Therefore, the study aims to determine whether and how individuals with diverse ToM profiles differ regarding personality impairment (AMPD Criterion A) and pathological facets (AMPD Criterion B).MethodAdults with PD (n = 39) and from the community (n = 42) completed tests assessing ToM skills and self-reported questionnaires assessing AMPD Criteria A and B. Hierarchical agglomerative and TwoStep cluster analyses were consecutively computed using scores and subscores from ToM tests as clustering variables. Multivariate analyses of variance were subsequently performed to compare the clusters on both AMPD Criteria. Five clinically and conceptually meaningful clusters were found. The most notable differences across clusters were observed for Intimacy and Empathy dysfunctions (Criterion A), as well as for the Deceitfulness, Callousness, and Hostility facets from the Antagonism domain and the Restricted affectivity facet from the Detachment domain (Criterion B).DiscussionThe results support the association between antagonistic personality facets and ToM deficits. However, clusters showing impairments in ToM abilities did not necessarily exhibit high levels of personality dysfunction or pathological facets, emphasizing that both constructs are not isomorphic. Nevertheless, specific profiles can help refine existing interventions to make them more sensitive and specific to the nature of ToM dysfunctions while considering personality functioning and facets.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Mentalizing in first-episode psychosis [J].
Achim, Amelie M. ;
Ouellet, Rosalie ;
Roy, Marc-Andre ;
Jackson, Philip L. .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2012, 196 (2-3) :207-213
[2]   Investigating Theory of Mind deficits in nonclinical psychopathy and Machiavellianism [J].
Ali, Farah ;
Chamorro-Premuzic, Tomas .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2010, 49 (03) :169-174
[3]   Factors contributing to social cognition impairment in borderline personality disorder and schizophrenia [J].
Andreou, Christina ;
Kelm, Lea ;
Bierbrodt, Julia ;
Braun, Vivien ;
Lipp, Michael ;
Yassari, Amir H. ;
Moritz, Steffen .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2015, 229 (03) :872-879
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, AM J PSYCHIAT, DOI [DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596.744053, 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596]
[5]  
Apperly I. A., 2021, The cognitive basis of social interaction across the lifespan., P96, DOI [10.1093/oso/9780198843290.003.0005, DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780198843290.003.0005]
[6]   Theory of Mind in Borderline and Cluster-C Personality Disorder [J].
Arntz, Arnoud ;
Bernstein, David ;
Oorschot, Margreet ;
Schobre, Paul .
JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 2009, 197 (11) :801-807
[7]   The Personality Inventory for DSM-5: Psychometric Evidence of Validity and Reliability-Updates [J].
Barchi-Ferreira, Ana Maria ;
Osorio, Flavia L. .
HARVARD REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 28 (04) :225-237
[8]   The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism [J].
Baron-Cohen, S ;
Wheelwright, S ;
Hill, J ;
Raste, Y ;
Plumb, I .
JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 42 (02) :241-251
[9]   Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children and children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism [J].
Baron-Cohen, S ;
O'Riordan, M ;
Stone, V ;
Jones, R ;
Plaisted, K .
JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 1999, 29 (05) :407-418
[10]   THE AUTISTIC CHILDS THEORY OF MIND - A CASE OF SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENTAL DELAY [J].
BARONCOHEN, S .
JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY AND ALLIED DISCIPLINES, 1989, 30 (02) :285-297