The impact of China's new agricultural subsidy policy on grain crop acreage

被引:47
作者
Fan, Pengfei [1 ,2 ]
Mishra, Ashok K. [3 ]
Feng, Shuyi [1 ,2 ]
Su, Min [1 ,2 ]
Hirsch, Stefan [4 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Agr Univ, China Resources & Environm & Dev Acad REDA, Nanjing 210095, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Agr Univ, Coll Publ Adm, Nanjing 210095, Peoples R China
[3] Arizona State Univ, Morrison Sch Agribusiness, WP Carey Sch Business, Mesa, AZ USA
[4] Univ Hohenheim, Inst Farm Management, D-70599 Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
Agricultural subsidy; Grain crop acreage sown; Difference-in-difference; China; DECOUPLED PAYMENTS; PROGRAM PAYMENTS; SUPPORT POLICIES; LAND TRANSFER; CONSTRAINTS; REFORM; COST; RISK; CAPITALIZATION; MECHANIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102472
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
As China is the world's largest producer, importer, and consumer of agricultural products, the new agricultural subsidy policy has significant implications for the global agricultural market. We assess the impact of the new agricultural subsidy on the grain crops acreage by applying difference-in-difference estimation to the China Rural Household Panel Survey (CRHPS) data. Results indicate that the new agricultural subsidy increases grain crop acreage. The results remain robust even after controlling for the effects from other policy measures. The study also identified the mechanism behind the subsidy's effect. Namely, the new program encourages operators to increase their grain crop acreage by renting more land and increasing the share of grain crops grown. Regarding heterogeneity of the results, the subsidy policy has a more positive impact on grain crop growers than on mixed crop growers, it does not affect large farms (>100 Mu) and its influence is greater among operators in the Northern regions of China. Our findings are relevant for understanding the effect of China's new agricultural subsidy policies and agrarian market reforms.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators [J].
Abadie, A .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2005, 72 (01) :1-19
[2]   The impact of coupled and decoupled government subsidies on off-farm labor participation of US farm operators [J].
Ahearn, MC ;
El-Osta, H ;
Dewbre, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 88 (02) :393-408
[3]   Heterogeneous impact of livelihood diversification on household welfare: Cross-country evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa [J].
Asfaw, Solomon ;
Scognamillo, Antonio ;
Di Caprera, Gloria ;
Sitko, Nicholas ;
Ignaciuk, Adriana .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 117 :278-295
[4]   Do different types of Common Agricultural Policy subsidies promote farm employment? [J].
Bojnec, Stefan ;
Ferto, Imre .
LAND USE POLICY, 2022, 112
[5]   The effect of decoupling on the decision to produce: An Irish case study [J].
Breen, JP ;
Hennessy, TC ;
Thorne, FS .
FOOD POLICY, 2005, 30 (02) :129-144
[6]   Quasi-experimental methods enable stronger inferences from observational data in ecology [J].
Butsic, Van ;
Lewis, David J. ;
Radeloff, Volker C. ;
Baumann, Matthias ;
Kuemmerle, Tobias .
BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2017, 19 :1-10
[7]   The Capitalization of Agricultural Subsidies into Land Prices [J].
Ciaian, Pavel ;
Baldoni, Edoardo ;
Kancs, d'Artis ;
Drabik, Dusan .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 13, 2021, 13 :17-38
[8]   The Capitalization of Area Payments into Farmland Rents: Micro Evidence from the New EU Member States [J].
Ciaian, Pavel ;
Kancs, d'Artis .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D AGROECONOMIE, 2012, 60 (04) :517-540
[9]   The potential of land rental markets in the process of economic development: Evidence from China [J].
Deininger, K ;
Jin, SQ .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2005, 78 (01) :241-270
[10]   Effects of credit constraints on household productivity in rural China [J].
Dong, Fengxia ;
Lu, Jing ;
Featherstone, Allen M. .
AGRICULTURAL FINANCE REVIEW, 2012, 72 (03) :402-+